Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation of glandular breast tissue and of boost volume in tangential breast irradiation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To determine the interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation of glandular breast tissue and of boost volume in tangential breast irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighteen consecutive patients with left sided breast cancer treated by breast conserving surgery agreed to participate in our study. Volumes of the glandular breast tissue (CTV breast) and of the boost (CTV boost) were delineated by five observers. We determined 'conformity indices' (CI) and the ratio between the volume of each CTV and the mean volume of all CTVs (CTV ratio). Subsequently we determined the most medial, lateral, anterior, posterior, cranial and caudal extensions both of CTV breast and CTV boost for all observers separately. RESULTS The mean CI breast was 0.87. For one observer we noted the highest CTV ratio in 17 out of 18 cases. No association was noted between CI breast and menopausal status. The mean CI boost was 0.56. We did not find a relation between the presence or absence of clips and the CI boost. For another observer we noted the lowest CTV boost ratio in 10 out of 17 cases. CONCLUSIONS We recommend that each institute should determine its interobserver variability with respect to CTV breast and CTV boost before implementing the delineation of target volumes by planning CT in daily practice.

[1]  J. Lebesque,et al.  Cardiac and lung complication probabilities after breast cancer irradiation. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Dosimetric analysis of intact breast irradiation in off-axis planes. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Ludvig Paul Muren,et al.  Cardiac and pulmonary doses and complication probabilities in standard and conformal tangential irradiation in conservative management of breast cancer. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  B. Emami,et al.  Evaluation of a standard breast tangent technique: a dose-volume analysis of tangential irradiation using three-dimensional tools. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  P Hofman,et al.  An improved breast irradiation technique using three-dimensional geometrical information and intensity modulation. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  I. Lax,et al.  Evaluation of irradiated heart volumes in stage I breast cancer patients treated with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  G. Döring,et al.  Sepsis in a newborn due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa from a contaminated tub bath. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  R. Clough,et al.  Technical factors associated with radiation pneumonitis after local +/- regional radiation therapy for breast cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  R. Siddon,et al.  Three-dimensional photon dose distributions with and without lung corrections for tangential breast intact treatments. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  K. Holli,et al.  Quality assurance in radiotherapy of breast cancer--variability in planning target volume delineation. , 2001, Acta oncologica.

[11]  K. Bratengeier,et al.  CT planning of boost irradiation in radiotherapy of breast cancer after conservative surgery. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  I. Barillot,et al.  Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  B J Mijnheer,et al.  Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  L. Marks,et al.  Variability of the location of internal mammary vessels and glandular breast tissue in breast cancer patients undergoing routine CT-based treatment planning. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  E. Strom,et al.  Breast IMRT: new tools leading to new vision. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Anil Sethi,et al.  Breast boost: Are we missing the target? , 2003, Cancer.

[17]  J. Debus,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the female breast. , 2002, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[18]  F. Vicini,et al.  Optimizing breast cancer treatment efficacy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  W. Manning,et al.  Reduction of cardiac volume in left-breast treatment fields by respiratory maneuvers: a CT study. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  P. Canney,et al.  Reducing cardiac dose in post-operative irradiation of breast cancer patients: the relative importance of patient positioning and CT scan planning. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.