Sensor operators as technology consumers: What do users really think about that radar?

Many companies rely on user experience metrics, such as Net Promoter scores, to monitor changes in customer attitudes toward their products. This paper suggests that similar metrics can be used to assess the user experience of the pilots and sensor operators who are tasked with using our radar, EO/IR, and other remote sensing technologies. As we have previously discussed, the problem of making our national security remote sensing systems useful, usable and adoptable is a human-system integration problem that does not get the sustained attention it deserves, particularly given the high- throughput, information-dense task environments common to military operations. In previous papers, we have demonstrated how engineering teams can adopt well-established human-computer interaction principles to fix significant usability problems in radar operational interfaces. In this paper, we describe how we are using a combination of Situation Awareness design methods, along with techniques from the consumer sector, to identify opportunities for improving human-system interactions. We explain why we believe that all stakeholders in remote sensing – including program managers, engineers, or operational users – can benefit from systematically incorporating some of these measures into the evaluation of our national security sensor systems. We will also provide examples of our own experience adapting consumer user experience metrics in operator-focused evaluation of currently deployed radar interfaces.

[1]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Designing for Situation Awareness : An Approach to User-Centered Design , 2003 .

[2]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[3]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.

[4]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Situation Awareness Oriented Design: From User's Cognitive Requirements to Creating Effective Supporting Technologies , 2003 .

[5]  Jeff Sauro,et al.  Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research , 2012 .

[6]  Gary Klein,et al.  The State of Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[7]  T. Keiningham,et al.  A holistic examination of Net Promoter , 2008 .

[8]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Ecological Interface Design: Progress and Challenges , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience - a research agenda , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Supporting operator problem solving through ecological interface design , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[11]  Daniel Schneider,et al.  Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: Improving the ‘Net-Promoter’ Score , 2008 .

[12]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[13]  M. Taras,et al.  ASSESSMENT – SUMMATIVE AND FORMATIVE – SOME THEORETICAL REFLECTIONS , 2005 .

[14]  Robert R. Hoffman,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering : The Future for a Changing World , 2017 .

[15]  F. Reichheld The one number you need to grow. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[16]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[17]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Situation Awareness Problems in General Aviation , 2000 .

[18]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation , 1992, CHI.

[19]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .