Personality traits and environmental choices: On the search for understanding.

In this paper we hypothesize that individuals will choose among alternative courses of action for power generation from wind farms according to their personality profiles. Through a factor analysis we found that certain characteristics of personality do indeed have an effect on environmental choice. The study involves an extensive survey based on the Big Five Traits model to find a pattern of choice that will help to better understand environmental decisions and be useful for policy makers to identify target groups and preview reactions to different courses of action. The research is potentially useful for the better preparation and design of publicity material, awareness raising campaigns and information provision for complex or unpopular policies affecting the environment or in environmental education in general. This research is especially interested in shedding some light on how personality is involved in the processes of environmental decision making, despite the limitations of the present study.

[1]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[2]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[3]  M. Soliño,et al.  Dealing with Heterogeneous Preferences Using Multilevel Mixed Models , 2014, Land Economics.

[4]  Richard Goldstein Latent Class and Discrete Latent Trait Models: Similarities and Differences , 1998 .

[5]  D. Hensher Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practice , 1994 .

[6]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective , 2005 .

[7]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[8]  Robert R. McCrae,et al.  Why I Advocate the Five-Factor Model: Joint Factor Analyses of the NEO-PI with Other Instruments , 1989 .

[9]  A. Sen,et al.  On Optimizing the Rate of Saving , 1961 .

[10]  William J. Baumol,et al.  Welfare Economics And The Theory Of The State , 1953 .

[11]  K. E. Kelly Relationship between the Five-Factor Model of Personality and the Scale of Creative Attributes and Behavior: A Validational Study. , 2006 .

[12]  G. Vaillant,et al.  The Big Five Personality Traits and the Life Course: A 45-Year Longitudinal Study , 1999 .

[13]  J. Elster,et al.  Foundations of Social Choice Theory , 1986 .

[14]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[15]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History , 2012 .

[16]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Extended Framework for Modeling Choice Behavior , 1999 .

[17]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Incorporating environmental attitudes in discrete choice models: an exploration of the utility of the awareness of consequences scale. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  P. Costa,et al.  Domain and Facet Personality Predictors of All-Cause Mortality Among Medicare Patients Aged 65 to 100 , 2005, Psychosomatic medicine.

[19]  N. S. Cardell,et al.  Measuring the societal impacts of automobile downsizing , 1980 .

[20]  T. McGlashan,et al.  Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders, II: 6-, 8- and 10-year follow-up , 2011, Psychological Medicine.

[21]  R. McCrae,et al.  The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits , 2007 .

[22]  J. Peter Clinch,et al.  Happiness, geography and the environment , 2008 .

[23]  David S. Brookshire,et al.  The valuation of aesthetic preferences , 1976 .

[24]  G. Tullock THE WELFARE COSTS OF TARIFFS, MONOPOLIES, AND THEFT , 1967 .

[25]  P. Costa,et al.  The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) , 2008 .

[26]  Berry Ives,et al.  Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements , 1974 .

[27]  David G. Davies,et al.  The Theory of Public Finance , 1960 .

[28]  J. Lee,et al.  The Best–Worst Scaling Approach: An Alternative to Schwartz's Values Survey , 2008, Journal of personality assessment.

[29]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  What If Consumer Experiments Impact Variances as Well as Means? Response Variability as a Behavioral Phenomenon , 2001 .

[30]  J. Louviere,et al.  Mixed integration of individual background, attitudes and tastes for landscape management , 2014 .

[31]  M. Soliño,et al.  The influence of home-site factors on residents' willingness to pay: An application for power generation from scrubland in Galicia, Spain , 2009 .

[32]  L. A. Goodman Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models , 1974 .

[33]  Denzil G. Fiebig,et al.  The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[34]  C. Gan,et al.  A Conjoint Hunting in Analysis of Waterfowl Louisiana , 1993 .

[35]  Dan Dolderman,et al.  Personality predictors of Consumerism and Environmentalism: A preliminary study , 2007 .

[36]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Formal Choice Models of Informal Choices , 2008 .

[37]  Brent W. Roberts,et al.  Personality Development in the Context of the Neo-Socioanalytic Model of Personality. , 2006 .

[38]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[39]  Robert J. Johnston,et al.  Choice experiments, site similarity and benefits transfer , 2007 .

[40]  N. Hanley,et al.  Choice modeling at the "market stall": Individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation , 2007 .

[41]  J. Geweke,et al.  Bayesian Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Conditional Distribution of Earnings of Men in the United States, 1967-1996 , 2005 .

[42]  R. Scarpa,et al.  Organic food choices and Protection Motivation Theory: addressing the psychological sources of heterogeneity , 2011 .

[43]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis , 1988 .

[44]  P. Boxall,et al.  Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class Approach , 2002 .

[45]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  The Use of Restricted Latent Class Models for Defining and Testing Nonparametric and Parametric Item Response Theory Models , 2001 .

[46]  B. Roberts,et al.  Back to the Future: Personality and Assessment and Personality Development. , 2009, Journal of research in personality.

[47]  An Alternative Approach to Measuring Schwartz's Values: The Best-Worst Scaling Approach , 2005 .

[48]  J. Harsanyi Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility , 1955 .

[49]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Formal Choice Models of Informal Choices: What Choice Modeling Research Can (and Can't) Learn from Behavioral Theory , 2008 .

[50]  Chester W. Schmidt,et al.  Personality trait characteristics of opioid abusers with and without comorbid personality disorders. , 1994 .

[51]  Joshua J. Jackson,et al.  Personality Measurement and Assessment in Large Panel Surveys , 2011, Forum for health economics & policy.

[52]  R. McCrae Social consequences of experiential openness. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[53]  Jennifer A. Thacher,et al.  Using Angler Characteristics and Attitudinal Data to Identify Environmental Preference Classes: A Latent-Class Model , 2006 .

[54]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[55]  F. M. Pulselli,et al.  Strengthening the threshold hypothesis: Economic and biophysical limits to growth , 2007 .

[56]  K. Lancaster A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[57]  J. Boyd,et al.  THE EFFECT OF FUEL ECONOMY STANDARDS ON THE U.S. AUTOMOTIVE MARKET: AN HEDONIC DEMAND ANALYSIS , 1980 .

[58]  C. Gan,et al.  A Conjoint Analysis of Waterfowl Hunting in Louisiana , 1993, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[59]  Masazo Okawa,et al.  Richard A. Musgrave, The Theory of Public Finance -A Study in Public Economy, New York, 1959 , 1960 .

[60]  Lewis R Goldberg,et al.  Profiling the "pro-environmental individual": a personality perspective. , 2012, Journal of personality.

[61]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Improving the Process of Valuing Non-Market Benefits: Combining Citizens’ Juries with Choice Modelling , 2006, Land Economics.

[62]  Stephen A. Marglin,et al.  The Social Rate of Discount and The Optimal Rate of Investment , 1963 .

[63]  R. Costanza,et al.  The evolution of preferences Why 'sovereign' preferences may not lead to sustainable policies and what to do about it , 1998 .

[64]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[65]  Paul F. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Latent Structure Analysis. , 1969 .

[66]  M. Sagoff The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment , 1988 .

[67]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[68]  D. Gyrd-Hansen Investigating the social value of health changes. , 2004, Journal of health economics.

[69]  M. Sagoff Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods:: A look beyond contingent pricing , 1998 .

[70]  Natalia López-Mosquera,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of received benefits and place attachment in willingness to pay and loyalty in suburban natural areas , 2013 .

[71]  M. Soliño,et al.  Personal Traits Underlying Environmental Preferences: A Discrete Choice Experiment , 2014, PloS one.

[72]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Designing Discrete Choice Experiments: Do Optimal Designs Come at a Price? , 2008 .

[73]  Roland K. Roberts,et al.  Spatial analysis of the amenity value of green open space , 2008 .

[74]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Accounting for Latent Attitudes in Willingness-to-Pay Studies: The Case of Coastal Water Quality Improvements in Tobago , 2012 .

[75]  J. Hirsh,et al.  Personality and environmental concern , 2010 .

[76]  R. E. Christal,et al.  Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. , 1992, Journal of personality.