U.S. Newspaper Coverage of Lung Cancer Screening from 2010 to 2022.

Background: Newspapers are an important source of information for the public about low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening (LCS) and may influence public perception and knowledge of this important cancer screening service. Objective: To evaluate the volume, content, and other characteristics of articles pertaining to LCS that have been published in U.S. newspapers. Methods: The ProQuest U.S. Newsstream database was searched for U.S. newspaper articles referring to LCS published between January 1, 2010 (the year of publication of the National Lung Screening Trial results) and March 28, 2022. Search terms included "lung cancer screening(s)", "lung screening(s)", "low dose screening(s)", and "LDCT". Search results were reviewed to identify those articles mentioning LCS. Characteristics of included articles and originating newspapers were extracted. Articles were divided among nine readers, who independently assessed article sentiment regarding LCS as well as additional article content using a standardized form. Results: The final analysis included 859 articles, comprising 816 nonsyndicated articles published in a single newspaper and 43 syndicated articles published in multiple newspapers. Sentiment regarding LCS was positive in 76% (651/859) of articles, neutral in 21% (184/859), and negative in 3% (24/859). Frequency of positive sentiment was lowest (61%) for articles published from 2010 to 2021; frequency of negative sentiment was highest (8%) for articles published in newspapers in the highest quartile for weekly circulation. LCS enrollment criteria were mentioned in 52% of articles, smoking cessation programs in 28%, need for annual CT in 27%, and shared decision making in 4%. Cost or insurance coverage for LCS was mentioned in 33% in articles. A total of 64% of articles mentioned at least one benefit of LCS (most commonly early detection or possible cure of lung cancer), and 23% mentioned at least one harm (most commonly false positives). A total of 9% of articles interviewed or mentioned a radiologist. Conclusion: Sentiment of U.S. newspaper articles covering LCS from 2010 to 2022 was overall positive. However, certain key elements of LCS were infrequently mentioned. Clinical Impact: The findings highlight areas for potential improvement of LCS media coverage; radiologists have an opportunity to take a more active role in this coverage.

[1]  A. Jemal,et al.  Lung Cancer Screening Rates During the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, Chest.

[2]  J. Blankenship,et al.  Food for thought: A natural language processing analysis of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines publice comments. , 2021, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[3]  A. Barratt,et al.  Global Media Coverage of the Benefits and Harms of Early Detection Tests. , 2021, JAMA internal medicine.

[4]  B. Little,et al.  Google search volume trends for cancer screening terms during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, Journal of medical screening.

[5]  Wouter van Atteveldt,et al.  The Validity of Sentiment Analysis: Comparing Manual Annotation, Crowd-Coding, Dictionary Approaches, and Machine Learning Algorithms , 2021, Communication Methods and Measures.

[6]  C. Berg,et al.  Using Prediction-Models to Reduce Persistent Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Draft 2020 USPSTF Lung-Cancer Screening Guidelines. , 2021, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  A. Strong,et al.  Using Social Media as a Platform for Increasing Knowledge of Lung Cancer Screening in High-Risk Patients , 2020, Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology.

[8]  D. Flum,et al.  Evaluating Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs about Lung Cancer Screening Using Crowdsourcing. , 2020, Chest.

[9]  C. von Wagner,et al.  Public awareness of and responses to media coverage of invitation errors in the Breast Screening Programme in England: a cross-sectional population survey , 2019, BMJ Open.

[10]  P. Pandharipande,et al.  Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening Engagement from the Patient and Provider Perspective. , 2019, Radiology.

[11]  Alison R. T. Brenner,et al.  Evaluating Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening , 2018, JAMA internal medicine.

[12]  Elizabeth A. Rohan,et al.  A qualitative analysis of smokers’ perceptions about lung cancer screening , 2017, BMC Public Health.

[13]  M. Schabath,et al.  High-risk community and primary care providers knowledge about and barriers to low-dose computed topography lung cancer screening. , 2017, Lung cancer.

[14]  Christina M Getrich,et al.  Patient Perspectives on Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening, New Mexico, 2014 , 2016, Preventing chronic disease.

[15]  N. Hanna,et al.  Lung cancer screening: what do long‐term smokers know and believe? , 2015, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[16]  D. Frosch,et al.  News coverage and sales of products with trans fat: effects before and after changes in federal labeling policy. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  C. Hugonie,et al.  Precision measurements, dark matter direct detection and LHC Higgs searches in a constrained NMSSM , 2008, 0811.3224.

[18]  Merrill Goozner,et al.  What Are the Roles and Responsibilities of the Media in Disseminating Health Information? , 2005, PLoS medicine.