OER Quality and Adaptation in K-12: Comparing Teacher Evaluations of Copyright-Restricted, Open, and Open/Adapted Textbooks

Conducted in conjunction with an institute on open textbook adaptation, this study compares textbook evaluations from practicing K-12 classroom teachers (n = 30) on three different types of textbooks utilized in their contexts: copyright-restricted, open, and open/adapted. Copyright-restricted textbooks consisted of those textbooks already in use by the teachers in their classrooms prior to the institute, open textbooks included alternatives from CK-12 and OpenStax, and open/adapted consisted of open textbooks that the teachers devoted time to adapting to their individual needs. Results indicate that open/adapted textbooks were evaluated as having the highest quality, and that open textbooks were of higher quality than copyright-restricted textbooks. Though some factors of quality might be influenced by cost differences (e.g., timeliness and the ability to adopt updated textbooks), results reveal that open and open/adapted textbooks may do a better job of meeting the needs of K-12 teachers in a variety of ways that may not be captured through traditional approaches to quality assurance. This study marks an early step in exploring the quality of K-12 open educational resources (OER) and the use of practicing teachers as authentic evaluators of textbooks for their local contexts.

[1]  Royce Kimmons,et al.  Expansive Openness in Teacher Practice , 2016 .

[2]  John Hilton,et al.  One college’s use of an open psychology textbook , 2012 .

[3]  Toru Iiyoshi,et al.  Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge , 2008 .

[4]  R. Raisamo,et al.  Challenges and Instructors' Intention to Adopt and Use Open Educational Resources in Higher Education in Tanzania. , 2014 .

[5]  David Wiley,et al.  A preliminary examination of the cost savings and learning impacts of using open textbooks in middle and high school science classes , 2012 .

[6]  D. Wiley,et al.  Why Openness in Education , 2016 .

[7]  Manpreet Kaur,et al.  Open Textbook Proof-of-Concept via Connexions , 2009 .

[8]  Kevin Williams.  Opening up education. The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content and open knowledge, T. Iiyoshi & M. Vijay Kumar (Eds.) : book review , 2009 .

[9]  Douglas Henton,et al.  William and Flora Hewlett Foundation , 2021 .

[10]  S. M. Duncan.  Patterns of learning object reuse in the connexions repository , 2009 .

[11]  David Wiley,et al.  “Opening” a new kind of school: The story of the Open High School of Utah , 2013 .

[12]  Louise Stoll,et al.  Professional Learning Community , 2010 .

[13]  J. Giles.  Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[14]  Ernesto Priego,et al.  Opening Teaching Landscapes: The Importance of Quality Assurance in the Delivery of Open Educational Resources , 2014, Open Praxis.

[15]  J. Brown,et al.  Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0 , 2008 .

[16]  Javiera Atenas,et al.  Quality assurance in the open: an evaluation of OER repositories , 2013 .

[17]  Neil Lutz,et al.  Examining the Reuse of Open Textbooks , 2012 .

[18]  T. Unwin,et al.  Digital learning management systems in Africa: myths and realities , 2010 .

[19]  Tsuyoshi Usagawa,et al.  Towards development of OER derived custom-built open textbooks: A baseline survey of university teachers at the University of the South Pacific , 2014 .

[20]  David A. Wiley,et al.  The cost and quality of online open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students , 2013, First Monday.

[21]  David Wiley,et al.  The Impact of Open Textbooks on Secondary Science Learning Outcomes , 2014 .

[22]  Jan M. Pawlowski,et al.  The Quality Adaptation Model: Adaptation and Adoption of the Quality Standard ISO/IEC 19796-1 for Learning, Education, and Training , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[23]  Lisa A. Petrides,et al.  Open textbook adoption and use: implications for teachers and learners , 2011 .

[24]  Royce Kimmons.  Developing Open Education Literacies with Practicing K-12 Teachers. , 2014 .

[25]  Susan D'Antoni,et al.  Open Educational Resources: the Way Forward , 2008 .

[26]  D. Dinevski.  Open educational resources and lifelong learning , 2008, ITI 2008 - 30th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces.

[27]  S. Patrick,et al.  The iNACOL State Policy Frameworks: 5 Critical Issues to Transform K-12 Education. , 2014 .

[28]  E. Archer,et al.  Uptake of OER by staff in distance education in South Africa , 2015 .

[29]  Daniel E. Atkins and John Seely Brown and Allen L. Hammond,et al.  A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities , 2007 .

[30]  Jeff Seaman,et al.  Opening the Curriculum: Open Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2014. , 2014 .

[31]  J. M. Pawlowski,et al.  User-oriented quality for OER: understanding teachers' views on re-use, quality, and trust , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..