A META-ANALYSIS OF CONDITIONAL REASONING TESTS OF AGGRESSION

James et al. (2005) reported an estimate of criterion-related validity (corrected only for dichotomization of criteria) of r = .44 across 11 conditional reasoning test of aggression (CRT-Aggression) validity studies. This meta-analysis incorporated a total sample size more than twice that of James et al. Our comparable validity estimate for CRT-Aggression scales predicting counterproductive work behaviors was r = .16. Validity for the current, commercially marketed test version (CRT-A) was lower (r = .10). These validity estimates increased somewhat (into the .24–.26 range) if studies using dichotomous criteria with low base rates were excluded from the meta-analysis. CRT-Aggression scales were correlated r = .14 with measures of job performance. As we differed with James et al. in some of our coding decisions, we reran all analyses using James et al.'s coding decisions and arrived at extremely similar results.

[1]  K A Kiehl,et al.  Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1983 .

[3]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Personality and absenteeism: a meta‐analysis of integrity tests , 2003 .

[4]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Validity of integrity tests for predicting drug and alcohol abuse: a meta-analysis. , 1993, NIDA research monograph.

[5]  J. Salgado The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Counterproductive Behaviors , 2002 .

[6]  John P. Wanous,et al.  The role of judgment calls in meta-analysis. , 1989 .

[7]  P. Sackett,et al.  A REVIEW OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN INTEGRITY TEST RESEARCH , 2007 .

[8]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Dichotomization of continuous variables: the implications for meta-analysis , 1990 .

[9]  Paul E. Tesluk,et al.  Personality as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Fairness and Retaliation , 1999 .

[10]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Measurement issues associated with conditional reasoning tests: indirect measurement and test faking. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Nambury S. Raju,et al.  Determining the Significance of Correlations Corrected for Unreliability and Range Restriction , 2003 .

[12]  Brian C. Frost Implicit and Explicit Personality: An Integrative Approach to Predicting Aggressive Behavior in a Field Setting , 2005 .

[13]  D. Ones,et al.  Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: a review and meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Mark J. Martinko,et al.  Exploring the role of individual differences in the prediction of workplace aggression. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. , 1993 .

[16]  Thomas E. Becker INTEGRITY IN ORGANIZATIONS : BEYOND HONESTY AND CONSCIENTIOUSNESS , 1998 .

[17]  L. Hough The 'Big Five' Personality Variables--Construct Confusion: Description Versus Prediction , 1992 .

[18]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? , 2006 .

[19]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  A Conditional Reasoning Measure for Aggression , 2005 .

[20]  Chia-Huei Emily Ko,et al.  Implicit and explicit personality: a test of a channeling hypothesis for aggressive behavior. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  J. Kagan The meanings of personality predicates. , 1988, The American psychologist.

[22]  Susan M. Stewart,et al.  An integrative typology of personality assessment for aggression: implications for predicting counterproductive workplace behavior. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Ellen M. Whitener,et al.  Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis. , 1990 .

[24]  R. Landis,et al.  Methodological and conceptual challenges in conducting and interpreting meta-analyses. , 2003 .