Adopting the Knowledge Embedded in New Methods - The Challange of Aligning Old and New Practices

Information Systems Engineering (ISE) is an interdisciplinary approach to enable the realisation of successful information systems in a broad sense. ISE comprises a number of areas of expertise that must be integrated and managed in order to build information systems. Since ISE is becoming progressively more complex there is an increasing need to codify and manage knowledge within and about the ISE process. From a knowledge perspective the different model types created in an ISE project are examples of codified knowledge about the future system. The descriptions of how work should proceed are examples of codified knowledge of the process of creating the system. In summary, one of the main concerns in the ISE process is to manage the substantial amount of knowledge associated with the process as such as well as with the target domain of the actual development project and the developed software. In the thesis I recognise three areas of knowledge in ISE: development process knowledge, target domain knowledge, and software knowledge. Furthermore, I use a set of knowledge perspectives in order to describe and analyse ISE from a knowledge perspective. Finally, I introduce three aspects: organisation, artefact, and individual in order to be able to discuss and analyse how methods are actually used in organisations and how they affect the work situation. The results are presented in the form of a framework for knowledge transfer in ISE that comprises the knowledge perspective, the knowledge area, and the aspect of knowledge transfer. The framework is thus used to analyse the results from the six papers enclosed in the thesis. The results also comprise an empirical characterisation of a method in use which is based on data collected during an ethnographical study. Finally the results are made concrete in the form of a pattern collection for method introduction and method use.

[1]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Applying System Development Methods in Practice , 2002 .

[2]  P. Middleton,et al.  Managing information system development in bureaucracies , 1999, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[3]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[4]  Jan Hartman,et al.  Vetenskapligt tänkande : från kunskapsteori till metodteori , 2004 .

[5]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, Second Edition , 2000 .

[6]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[7]  David Graham Wastell,et al.  Learning Dysfunctions in Information Systems Development: Overcoming The Social Defenses With Transitional Objects , 1999, MIS Q..

[8]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The use of systems development methodologies in practice: a field study , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[9]  Colette Rolland,et al.  An Assembly Process Model for Method Engineering , 2001, CAiSE.

[10]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  The usage of systems development methods: are we stuck to old practices? , 1998, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[11]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction , 1998 .

[12]  Sven A. Carlsson,et al.  Methods as knowledge enablers in software development organizations , 2003, ECIS.

[13]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  The Relationship Between Organisational Culture and the Deployment of Systems Development Methodologies , 2001, CAiSE.

[14]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  APPLYING SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT METHODS IN PRACTICE-The RUP example , 2005 .

[15]  S. Fuller Knowledge Management Foundations , 2001 .

[16]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Information Systems Engineering: State of the Art and Research Themes , 2000 .

[17]  Jennie Carroll The process of ISD methodology selection and use: a case study , 2003, ECIS.

[18]  Chen Li Software development method based on PFC , 2003 .

[19]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[20]  Christopher Westrup,et al.  Information systems methodologies in use , 1993, J. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Information Systems Development as Knowledge Work: The Body of Systems Development Process Knowledge , 1999, EJC.

[23]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[24]  Linda Schamber,et al.  Research Methods for Students, Academics and Professionals: Information Management and Systems , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Per Backlund IDENTIFYING SITUATIONAL FACTORS FOR ISDEVELOPMENT PROCESSES: APPLYING THEMETHOD-IN-ACTION FRAMEWORK , 2002 .

[26]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[27]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[28]  Beth Preston,et al.  Cognition and Tool Use , 1998 .