An analytic hierarchy process approach with linguistic variables for selection of an R&D strategic alliance partner

This study establishes a mechanism for partner selection that emphasizes the relation of criteria and motivation. Since the motivations for establishing strategic alliances follow different enterprises' needs, attempting to identify universal criteria weights that enterprises should employ when seeking a proper partner are not productive. Consequently, the weighting process for criteria must consider the intensity of motivations for establishing the alliance. When evaluating companies with closer levels of performance, the approach of pair-wise comparison is more suitable than the direct scoring method. Considering the strategic level, most comparisons may be vague and linguistic variables defined as fuzzy numbers are applied to this situation. The calculation procedure for the weighting and evaluation processes under a vague environment is proposed and validated by using an illustrative example.

[1]  K. R. Harrigan Joint ventures and competitive strategy , 1988 .

[2]  Victor B. Kreng,et al.  Evaluation of knowledge portal development tools using a fuzzy AHP approach: The case of Taiwanese stone industry , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Fritz Klocke,et al.  Evaluating alternative production cycles using the extended fuzzy AHP method , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  L. M. D. C. Ibáñez,et al.  A subjective approach for ranking fuzzy numbers , 1989 .

[5]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach , 2003 .

[6]  R. J. Kuo,et al.  A decision support system for selecting convenience store location through integration of fuzzy AHP and artificial neural network , 2002, Comput. Ind..

[7]  Bruce A. Walters,et al.  Strategic alliances and joint ventures: Making them work , 1994 .

[8]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Horizontal collaboration in semiconductor manufacturing industry supply chain: An evaluation of collaboration intensity index , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[9]  Timothy J. Wilkinson,et al.  Strategic alliances: Choose your partners , 1995 .

[10]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[11]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Choosing Organizational Modes of Strategic Technology Partnering: International and Sectoral Differences , 1996 .

[13]  Yu Jing,et al.  A discussion on Extent Analysis Method and applications of fuzzy AHP , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Alliances, External Technology Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change , 1997 .

[15]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MODE: A TRANSACTION COST CONCEPTUALIZATION , 1998 .

[16]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[17]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  Selection of a cleaning system for engine maintenance based on the analytic hierarchy process , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[18]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link : how firms compete through strategic alliances / Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. , 1993 .

[19]  D. Dubois,et al.  Additions of interactive fuzzy numbers , 1981 .

[20]  Antonio González A study of the ranking function approach through mean values , 1990 .

[21]  D. Dubois,et al.  Operations on fuzzy numbers , 1978 .

[22]  He-Yau Kang,et al.  Multicriteria scheduling using fuzzy theory and tabu search , 2002 .

[23]  Youngbae Kim,et al.  Technological Collaboration in the Korean Electronic Parts Industry: Patterns and Key Success Factors , 2003 .

[24]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  A Modification of the Index of Liou and Wang for Ranking Fuzzy Number , 2007, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[25]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Discouraging Opportunistic Behavior in Collaborative R&D: A New Role for Government , 1995 .

[26]  Rachelle C. Sampson Organizational Choice in R&D Alliances: Knowledge Based and Transaction Cost Perspectives , 2004 .

[27]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value , 1992 .

[28]  Chien-Tzu Tsai,et al.  EVOLUTION OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES FOR TAIWAN'S SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY: FORMATION OF RESEARCH CONSORTIA , 2000 .

[29]  Ching-Hsue Cheng Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function , 1997 .

[30]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[31]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[32]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[34]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic - theory and applications , 1995 .

[35]  Sheng-Chai Chi,et al.  Examination of the influence of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the development of an intelligent location selection support system of convenience store , 2001, Proceedings Joint 9th IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference (Cat. No. 01TH8569).

[36]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications , 1986 .

[37]  R. Yager On a general class of fuzzy connectives , 1980 .

[38]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  Strategic management in high technology firms , 1990 .

[39]  K. Kim,et al.  Ranking fuzzy numbers with index of optimism , 1990 .

[40]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  Edward Levitas,et al.  Selecting partners for successful international alliances: Examination of U.S. and Korean firms , 1997 .

[42]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  Personnel selection using fuzzy MCDM algorithm , 1994 .

[43]  J. Hagedoorn Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[44]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[45]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Fuzzy sets and systems ' . Theory and applications , 2007 .

[46]  T. Das,et al.  Resource and Risk Management in the Strategic Alliance Making Process , 1998 .

[47]  Lawrence W. Lan,et al.  Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and choquet integral , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[48]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[49]  Mariko Sakakibara,et al.  HETEROGENEITY OF FIRM CAPABILITIES AND COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF MOTIVES , 1997 .

[50]  W. H. Hoffmann,et al.  Success Factors of Strategic Alliances in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises—An Empirical Survey , 2001 .

[51]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Possibility Theory - An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty , 1988 .

[52]  H. Zuckerman,et al.  Hospital alliances: Cooperative strategy in a competitive environment , 1990, Health care management review.

[53]  Glenn M. Pfeiffer,et al.  Technology R&D alliances and firm value , 2001 .