Polarization Losses under Accelerated Stress Test Using Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Supported Pt Catalyst in PEM Fuel Cells

The electrochemical behavior for Pt catalysts supported on multiwalled carbon nanotubes and Vulcan XC-72 in proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells under accelerated stress test at 1.2 V was examined by cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and polarization technique. Pt catalyst supported on multiwalled carbon nanotubes exhibited a highly stable electrochemical surface area, oxygen reduction kinetics, and fuel cell performance under highly oxidizing conditions, indicating multiwalled carbon nanotubes have a high corrosion resistance and a strong interaction with Pt nanoparticles. Further analyses were conducted using Tafel slope, ohmic resistances, and limiting current density were conducted for the multiwalled carbon nanotube supported Pt catalyst from the actual polarization curve to differentiate kinetic, ohmic, and mass-transfer polarization losses. It was found that kinetic contribution to the total overpotential was the largest throughout the stress test. However, during accelerated stress test, the fraction of kinetic overpotential decreased, the fraction of ohmic overpotential increased, and the fraction of mass-transfer overpotential remained relatively constant. The increased fraction of ohmic overpotential suggests increased proton transport limitation in the catalyst layer.

[1]  F. Büchi,et al.  Polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability , 2009 .

[2]  Mark K. Debe,et al.  High voltage stability of nanostructured thin film catalysts for PEM fuel cells , 2006 .

[3]  Robert M. Darling,et al.  Kinetic Model of Platinum Dissolution in PEMFCs , 2003 .

[4]  Francisco A. Uribe,et al.  A study of polymer electrolyte fuel cell performance at high voltages. Dependence on cathode catalyst layer composition and on voltage conditioning , 2002 .

[5]  H. Tang,et al.  PEM fuel cell cathode carbon corrosion due to the formation of air/fuel boundary at the anode , 2006 .

[6]  F. Harnisch,et al.  Comparative study on the performance of pyrolyzed and plasma-treated iron(II) phthalocyanine-based catalysts for oxygen reduction in pH neutral electrolyte solutions , 2009 .

[7]  Hubert A. Gasteiger,et al.  Factors Impacting Chemical Degradation Of Perfluorinated Sulfonic Acid Ionomers , 2006 .

[8]  Siyu Ye,et al.  Recent advances in activity and durability enhancement of Pt/C catalytic cathode in PEMFC: Part II: Degradation mechanism and durability enhancement of carbon supported platinum catalyst , 2007 .

[9]  A. Vahidi,et al.  A review of the main parameters influencing long-term performance and durability of PEM fuel cells , 2008 .

[10]  Yuyan Shao,et al.  Low-cost and durable catalyst support for fuel cells: Graphite submicronparticles , 2010 .

[11]  T. Springer,et al.  Modeling and Experimental Diagnostics in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 1993 .

[12]  M. Gerard,et al.  Multiscale Model of Carbon Corrosion in a PEFC: Coupling with Electrocatalysis and Impact on Performance Degradation , 2008 .

[13]  Qin Xin,et al.  Preparation and Characterization of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube-Supported Platinum for Cathode Catalysts of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells , 2003 .

[14]  Yuyan Shao,et al.  The durability dependence of Pt/CNT electrocatalysts on the nanostructures of carbon nanotubes: hollow- and bamboo-CNTs. , 2009, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[15]  Yong Wang,et al.  Novel catalyst support materials for PEM fuel cells : current status and future prospects , 2009 .

[16]  T. Springer,et al.  Characterization of polymer electrolyte fuel cells using ac impedance spectroscopy , 1996 .

[17]  Adam Z. Weber,et al.  Effects of Microporous Layers in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 2005 .

[18]  Edward F. Holby,et al.  Instability of Supported Platinum Nanoparticles in Low-Temperature Fuel Cells , 2007 .

[19]  Geping Yin,et al.  Durability Study of Pt ∕ C and Pt ∕ CNTs Catalysts under Simulated PEM Fuel Cell Conditions , 2006 .

[20]  H. Gasteiger,et al.  Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs , 2005 .

[21]  Geping Yin,et al.  Understanding and Approaches for the Durability Issues of Pt-Based Catalysts for PEM Fuel Cell , 2007 .

[22]  D. Candusso,et al.  A review on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell catalyst degradation and starvation issues: Causes, consequences and diagnostic for mitigation , 2009 .

[23]  T. Jarvi,et al.  Electrocatalytic corrosion of carbon support in PEMFC cathodes , 2004 .

[24]  James M. Fenton,et al.  Analysis of Polarization Curves to Evaluate Polarization Sources in Hydrogen/Air PEM Fuel Cells , 2005 .

[25]  Jun Shen,et al.  A review of PEM fuel cell durability: Degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies , 2008 .

[26]  Jong-Won Lee,et al.  Effect of PTFE content in microporous layer on water management in PEM fuel cells , 2008 .

[27]  Mariana Ciureanu and,et al.  Electrochemical Impedance Study of PEM Fuel Cells. Experimental Diagnostics and Modeling of Air Cathodes , 2001 .

[28]  Jiujun Zhang,et al.  A review of accelerated stress tests of MEA durability in PEM fuel cells , 2009 .

[29]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  Surface Area Loss of Supported Platinum in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 1993 .

[30]  E. Gyenge,et al.  Characterizing the Structural Degradation in a PEMFC Cathode Catalyst Layer: Carbon Corrosion , 2009 .

[31]  Yuehe Lin,et al.  PtRu/carbon nanotube nanocomposite synthesized in supercritical fluid: a novel electrocatalyst for direct methanol fuel cells. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[32]  B. Popov,et al.  Durability study of Pt3Ni1 catalysts as cathode in PEM fuel cells , 2004 .

[33]  Deborah J. Myers,et al.  Effect of voltage on platinum dissolution : Relevance to polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2006 .

[34]  D. Wood,et al.  Durability Aspects of Gas-Diffusion and Microporous Layers , 2009 .

[35]  L. J. Bregoli,et al.  A Reverse-Current Decay Mechanism for Fuel Cells , 2005 .

[36]  H. Ha,et al.  Investigation of oxygen gain in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells , 2004 .

[37]  B. Popov,et al.  Effect of hydrophobicity and pore geometry in cathode GDL on PEM fuel cell performance , 2009 .

[38]  Mahlon Wilson,et al.  Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation. , 2007, Chemical reviews.

[39]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  Electrochemistry of fuel cells for transportation applications , 1984 .