Group Discussion and Judgment

The influence of group discussion on individual judgments and group decisions is one of the oldest problems in the experimental study of small groups (Bechterev & DeLange, 1924; Burtt, 1920; Marston, 1924). Early interest was focused primarily on the quality of group versus individual products, that is, on the question are groups better than individuals? Attention has turned more recently to examining judgmental shifts per se, without regard to improvement or decline in quality. We will be concerned primarily with changes induced by discussion, and will not deal at length with the perplexing question of whether the changes are for the better. The judgments and decisions with which we will deal are those where alternatives are along a bipolar, unidimensional scale of some sort, for example, “How large should the damage award be in a civil trial?”

[1]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. , 1976 .

[2]  D. G. Pruitt Choice shifts in group discussion: An introductory review. , 1971 .

[3]  S. Moscovici,et al.  The group as a polarizer of attitudes. , 1969 .

[4]  F. Restle,et al.  The road to agreement: Subgroup pressures in small group consensus processes. , 1974 .

[5]  L. R. Hoffman Group Problem Solving1 , 1965 .

[6]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts , 1977 .

[7]  W. H. Crockett,et al.  Risk-As-Value Hypothesis: The Relationship Between Perception of Self, Others, and the Risky Shift. , 1971 .

[8]  Colin Fraser,et al.  Group risk‐taking and group polarization , 1971 .

[9]  D. Harnett,et al.  A level of aspiration model for group decision making. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[11]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[12]  A. Jenness,et al.  The role of discussion in changing opinion regarding a matter of fact. , 1932 .

[13]  M. Kaplan Discussion Polarization Effects in a Modified Jury Decision Paradigm: Informational Influences , 1977 .

[14]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  Level of aspiration. , 1944 .

[15]  John C. Roberts,et al.  The effects of conformity, information, and confidence upon subjects' willingness to take risk following a group discussion , 1972 .

[16]  W. Marston Studies in Testimony , 1924 .

[17]  N. Anderson,et al.  Information integration theory and reinforcement theory as approaches to interpersonal attraction. , 1973 .

[18]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  Components of group risk taking , 1967 .

[19]  M. Wallach,et al.  The roles of information, discussion, and consensus in group risk taking , 1965 .

[20]  David G. Myers,et al.  Group-Induced Polarization of Attitudes and Behavior , 1978 .

[21]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[22]  C. Silverthorne Information Input and the Group Shift Phenomenon in Risk Taking. , 1971 .

[23]  V. L. Allen Situational Factors In Conformity1 , 1965 .

[24]  Ebbe B. Ebbesen,et al.  Proportion of risky to conservative arguments in a group discussion and choice shift. , 1974 .

[25]  N. Anderson,et al.  An information integration analysis of attitude change in group discussion. , 1976 .

[26]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Interpersonal comparison versus persuasive argumentation: A more direct test of alternative explanations for group-induced shifts in individual choice , 1973 .

[27]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Psychological foundations of attitudes , 1968 .

[28]  S. Moscovici,et al.  Social Influence, Conformity Bias, and the Study of Active Minorities , 1972 .

[29]  C. H. Castore,et al.  Risky Shift: Social Value or Social Choice? An Alternative Model. , 1971 .

[30]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Risk taking by individuals and groups: An assessment of research employing choice dilemmas. , 1971 .

[31]  Majority Influence on Group Choices Among Bets. , 1976 .

[32]  H. E. Burtt Sex Differences in the Effect of Discussion. , 1920 .

[33]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  The Role of Social Comparison in Choice Shifts. , 1979 .

[34]  G. Cvetkovich,et al.  Attitude polarization: The relative influence of discussion group structure and reference group norms. , 1973 .

[35]  N. Anderson Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[36]  J. F. Dashiell An experimental analysis of some group effects. , 1930 .

[37]  David G. Myers,et al.  Group-Induced Polarization in Simulated Juries , 1976 .

[38]  Amiram D. Vinokur,et al.  Distribution of Initial Risk Levels and Group Decisions Involving Risk. , 1969 .

[39]  Charles E. Miller,et al.  Judgments and Group Discussion: Effect of Presentation and Memory Factors on Polarization , 1977 .

[40]  Lynn E. Miller,et al.  Reducing the effects of juror bias. , 1978 .

[41]  M. Fishbein Progress in social psychology , 1980 .

[42]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[43]  N. Kerr,et al.  The Psychology of the courtroom , 1981 .

[44]  M. Kaplan,et al.  6 – INFORMATION INTEGRATION IN SOCIAL JUDGMENT: INTERACTION OF JUDGE AND INFORMATIONAL COMPONENTS , 1975 .

[45]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Social combination models, persuasive arguments theory, social comparison theory, and choice shift. , 1982 .

[46]  R. D. Clark,et al.  Where is the Risky Shift? Dependence on Instructions. , 1969 .

[47]  M. Kaplan Amount of information and polarity of attraction , 1981 .

[48]  G. Stasser A Model of Social Influence During Group Discussion: An Application With Four- and Six-Person Mock Juries , 1977 .

[49]  D. J. Schneider,et al.  Test of the "risk is a value" hypothesis. , 1969 .

[50]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Psychological set and social conformity. , 1956, Journal of personality.

[51]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Determinants of scientific progress: The case of research on the risky shift. , 1973 .

[52]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Psychology of Group Influence , 1981 .

[53]  M. Kaplan,et al.  Human judgment and decision processes , 1975 .

[54]  N. Anderson,et al.  Averaging model analysis of set-size effect in impression formation. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[55]  M. E. Shaw Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[56]  A. Bandura Vicarious Processes: A Case of No-Trial Learning1 , 1965 .

[57]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[58]  S. Siegel,et al.  Level of aspiration and decision making. , 1957, Psychological review.

[59]  Dean G. Pruitt,et al.  Conclusions: Toward an understanding of choice shifts in group discussion. , 1971 .

[60]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts: A group-problem-solving approach. , 1974 .

[61]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[62]  J. Stoner A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk , 1961 .

[63]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Testing two classes of theories about group induced shifts in individual choice , 1973 .

[64]  E. P. Willems Risk is a Value , 1969, Psychological reports.

[65]  Amiram D. Vinokur,et al.  What a person thinks upon learning he has chosen differently from others: Nice evidence for the persuasive-arguments explanation of choice shifts , 1975 .

[66]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  A decision-making analysis of persuasive argumentation and the choice-shift effect , 1975 .

[67]  Garold Stasser,et al.  Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model. , 1981 .

[68]  M. E. Shaw A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. , 1932 .

[69]  M. Kaplan Dispositional effects and weight of information in impression formation. , 1971 .

[70]  J. H. Davis Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[71]  H. Kelley,et al.  Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence , 1978 .

[72]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization , 1977 .