Effect of Processing on the in Vitro and in Vivo Protein Quality of Yellow and Green Split Peas (Pisum sativum).

In order to determine the effect of extrusion, baking, and cooking on the protein quality of yellow and green split peas, a rodent bioassay was conducted and compared to an in vitro method of protein quality determination. The Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) of green split peas (71.4%) was higher than that of yellow split peas (67.8%), on average. Similarly, the average Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) of green split peas (69%) was higher than that of yellow split peas (67%). Cooked green pea flour had lower PDCAAS and DIAAS values (69.19% and 67%) than either extruded (73.61%, 70%) or baked (75.22%, 70%). Conversely, cooked yellow split peas had the highest PDCCAS value (69.19%), while extruded yellow split peas had the highest DIAAS value (67%). Interestingly, a strong correlation was found between in vivo and in vitro analysis of protein quality (R2 = 0.9745). This work highlights the differences between processing methods on pea protein quality and suggests that in vitro measurements of protein digestibility could be used as a surrogate for in vivo analysis.

[1]  L. Malcolmson,et al.  Determination of the protein quality of cooked Canadian pulses , 2017, Food science & nutrition.

[2]  A. Franczyk,et al.  Impact of Processing on the Protein Quality of Pinto Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) Flours and Blends, As Determined by in Vitro and in Vivo Methodologies. , 2017, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[3]  J. House,et al.  Factors Influencing the Quality of Dietary Proteins: Implications for Pulses , 2017 .

[4]  P. Moughan,et al.  Protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores and digestible indispensable amino acid scores differentially describe protein quality in growing male rats. , 2015, The Journal of nutrition.

[5]  R. Tyler,et al.  Effect of genotype and environment on the concentrations of starch and protein in, and the physicochemical properties of starch from, field pea and fababean. , 2012, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[6]  E. Peñas,et al.  Assessment of the nutritional quality of raw and extruded Pisum sativum L. var. laguna seeds , 2011 .

[7]  L. Malcolmson,et al.  Phenolics and antioxidant activity of lentil and pea hulls , 2011 .

[8]  G. Leson,et al.  Evaluating the quality of protein from hemp seed (Cannabis sativa L.) products through the use of the protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score method. , 2010, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[9]  S. H. Prudencio,et al.  Changes in the functional properties and antinutritional factors of extruded hard-to-cook common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.). , 2010, Journal of food science.

[10]  D. Hatcher,et al.  Effect of cooking on the composition of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) , 2010 .

[11]  J. Boye,et al.  Bioactive proteins and peptides in pulse crops: pea, chickpea and lentil. , 2010 .

[12]  C. Nyachoti,et al.  Nutritional quality of legume seeds as affected by some physical treatments, Part 1: Protein quality evaluation , 2009 .

[13]  F. Marzo,et al.  Nutritional evaluation of raw and extruded kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. pinto) in chicken diets. , 2006, Poultry science.

[14]  R. Visser,et al.  Genetic variation in pea seed globulin composition. , 2006, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[15]  R. Habiba,et al.  Effect of soaking and extrusion conditions on antinutrients and protein digestibility of legume seeds. , 2003 .

[16]  I. Astiasarán,et al.  Cooking and warm-holding : Effect on general composition and amino acids of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), chickpeas (Cicer arietinum), and lentils (Lens culinaris) , 1997 .

[17]  M. Fernández,et al.  Nutritional Assessment of Raw and Processed Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Cultivar Major in Growing Rats , 1996 .

[18]  Y. P. Gupta Anti-nutritional and toxic factors in food legumes: a review , 1987, Plant foods for human nutrition.

[19]  G. Sarwar,et al.  Comparisons between true digestibility of total nitrogen and limiting amino acids in vegetable proteins fed to rats. , 1986, The Journal of nutrition.

[20]  S. Sayeed,et al.  Effect of a Bangladeshi home-cooking procedure on the amino acid content, trypsin inhibitor activity and in vitro digestibility of some legume seeds , 1985 .

[21]  J. C. Alexander,et al.  Protein Quality of Raw and Autoclaved Plant Protein Blends , 1983 .

[22]  W. H. Martinez,et al.  Heat Effects on Peas, Effect of Autoclaving on the Basic Amino Acids and Proteins of the Chick Pea , 1960 .