Effects of Modality on Interrupted Flight Deck Performance: Implications for Data Link

Externally-imposed tasks frequently interrupt ongoing task performance in the commercial flight deck. While normally managed without consequence, basic research as well as aviation accident and incident investigations show that interruptions can negatively affect performance and safety. This research investigates the influence of interruption and interrupted task modality on pilot performance in a simulated commercial flight deck. Fourteen current commercial airline pilots performed approach scenarios in a fixed-base flight simulator. Air traffic control instructions, conveyed either aurally or visually (via a data link system) interrupted a visual task (obtaining information from the Flight Management System) and an auditory task (listening to the automated terminal information service recording). Some results confirm the hypothesized performance advantage of cross-modality conditions, more compelling nature of auditory interruptions, and interruption-resistance of auditory ongoing tasks. However, taken together, results suggest the four interaction conditions had different effects on pilot performance. These results have implications for the design of data link systems, and for facilitating interruption management through interface design, aiding, and training programs.

[1]  James M. Diehl Human Factors Experiments for Data Link : Interim Report No. 6. : An Evaluation of Data Link Input/Output Devices Using Airline Flight Simulators , 1975 .

[2]  H A Rollins,et al.  Processing of words presented simultaneously to eye and ear. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Edwin H. Hilborn,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS EXPERIMENTS FOR DATA LINK , 1976 .

[4]  S. Kirmeyer,et al.  Coping with competing demands: interruption and the type A pattern. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Situation Awareness and the Cognitive Management of Complex Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[6]  B B Morgan,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1976 .

[7]  Graeme E. Field EXPERIMENTUS INTERRUPTUS , 1987, SGCH.

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. , 1976, Psychological review.

[9]  D. Broadbent,et al.  What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity , 1989 .

[10]  David McKitterick The processing of words , 1997 .

[11]  M. S. Huntley,et al.  The Use and Design of Flightcrew Checklists and Manuals , 1991 .

[12]  Karol Kerns DATA-LINK COMMUNICATION BETWEEN CONTROLLERS AND PILOTS: A REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS OF THE SIMULATION LITERATURE. , 1991 .

[13]  Hugh L. Dryden,et al.  THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION , 1958 .

[14]  J. Cellier,et al.  Interference between switched tasks , 1992 .

[15]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Alarms in human supervisory control: a human factors perspective , 1992 .

[16]  J. G. Kreifeldt,et al.  Interruption as a test of the user-computer interface , 1981 .

[17]  A Latorella Kara,et al.  Investigating Interruptions: Implications for Flightdeck Performance , 1999 .

[18]  Marvin C. Waller,et al.  A piloted simulation study of data link ATC message exchange , 1989 .

[19]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[20]  Charles E. Knox,et al.  NASA transport systems research vehicle B-737 data link system and display formats , 1990 .