Inhomogeneity correction and the analytic anisotropic algorithm

The ability of the analytic anisotropic algorithm (AAA), a superposition– convolution algorithm implemented in the Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) treatment planning system (TPS), to accurately account for the presence of inhomogeneities in simple geometries is examined. The goal of 2% accuracy, as set out by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 65, serves as a useful benchmark against which to evaluate the inhomogeneity correction capabilities of this treatment planning algorithm. A planar geometry phantom consisting of upper and lower layers of Solid Water (Gammex rmi, Middleton, WI) separated by a heterogeneity region of variable thickness, is modeled within the Eclipse TPS. Results obtained with the AAA are compared with experimental measurements. Seven different materials, spanning the range from air to aluminum, constitute the inhomogeneity layer. In general, the AAA overpredicts dose beyond low‐density regions and underpredicts dose distal to volumes of high density. In many cases, the deviation between the AAA and experimental results exceeds the Task Group 65 target of 2%. The source of these deviations appears to arise from an inability of the AAA to correctly account for altered attenuation along primary ray paths. PACS number: 87.53.Tf

[1]  J. B. Massey Dose distribution problems in megavoltage therapy. I. The problem of air spaces. , 1962, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  M Engelsman,et al.  Impact of simple tissue inhomogeneity correction algorithms on conformal radiotherapy of lung tumours. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Evaluation of lung dose correction methods for photon irradiations of thorax phantoms. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  A. Boyer,et al.  Tissue Inhomogeneity Corrections for Megavoltage Photon Beams , 2004 .

[5]  J. Battista,et al.  Half body radiotherapy: the use of computed tomography to determine the dose to lung. , 1980, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Harold O. Wyckoff,et al.  International Commission ON Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). , 1974, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[7]  J. Wong,et al.  On methods of inhomogeneity corrections for photon transport. , 1990, Medical physics.

[8]  M R Sontag,et al.  The equivalent tissue-air ratio method for making absorbed dose calculations in a heterogeneous medium. , 1978, Radiology.

[9]  Sergei Zavgorodni,et al.  Evaluation of the analytical anisotropic algorithm in an extreme water–lung interface phantom using Monte Carlo dose calculations , 2007, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[10]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Robert J. Shalek,et al.  Determination of Absorbed Dose in a Patient Irradiated by Beams of X or Gamma Rays in Radiotherapy Procedures , 1977 .

[12]  S. McDonald,et al.  Method for calculating dose when lung tissue lies in the treatment field. , 1976, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[13]  Mauro Iori,et al.  Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation. , 2006, Medical physics.

[14]  M R Sontag,et al.  Corrections to absorbed dose calculations for tissue inhomogeneities. , 1977, Medical physics.

[15]  C. Orton,et al.  Study of lung density corrections in a clinical trial (RTOG 88-08). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.