Firm size and firm growth rate distributions - The case of Denmark

There has been a recent renewed interest in the study of firm size distributions and firm growth rate distributions. Gibrat’s law assumes firm growth rates are independent and identically distributed and that size is determined by a firstorder integrated process, leaving the size distribution log-normal. This article analyzes these distribution patterns in an empirical context, questioning the foundation of this model. In a cross-section analysis of four industries using Danish data, we show that the foundation and the outcome of Gibrat’s law are empirically far-fetched. In particular, significant deviations from normality are found.

[1]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Size Distribution of Business Firms , 1958 .

[2]  David S. Evans.  Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  J. Sutton.  Gibrat's Legacy , 1996 .

[4]  David S. Evans.  The Relationship between Firm Growth, Size, and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries. , 1987 .

[5]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[6]  Massimo Riccaboni,et al.  Innovation and corporate growth in the evolution of the drug industry , 2001 .

[7]  G. Richardson,et al.  The Organisation of Industry , 1972 .

[8]  George J. Stigler,et al.  The Organization of Industry , 1969 .

[9]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[10]  Elena Cefis,et al.  Corporate Growth and Industrial Structure. Some Evidence from the Italian Manufacturing Industry , 2001 .

[11]  R. Caves.  Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms , 1998 .

[12]  J. Barney.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[13]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities , 2001 .

[14]  N. Foss.  The classical theory of production and the capabilities view of the firm , 1997 .

[15]  Nicholas Oulton,et al.  Growth and Size of Firms , 1996 .

[16]  S. J. Prais,et al.  The Analysis of Business Concentration: A Statistical Approach , 1956 .

[17]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[18]  C. Higsona,et al.  The cross-sectional dynamics of the US business cycle : 1950 – 1999 , 2002 .

[19]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  The Relationship between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector , 1986 .

[20]  Giulio Bottazzi.  Subbotools User's Manual , 2004 .

[21]  E. Penrose,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[22]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[23]  P. Kattuman,et al.  The Business Cycle, Macroeconomic Shocks and the Cross-Section: The Growth of UK Quoted Companies , 2004 .

[24]  Paul Dunne,et al.  Age, Size, Growth and Survival: UK Companies in the 1980s , 1994 .

[25]  L. Amaral,et al.  Scaling behaviour in the growth of companies , 1996, Nature.

[26]  Giovanni Urga,et al.  Are Differences in Firm Size Transitory or Permanent , 2003 .

[27]  A. Secchi,et al.  Why are distributions of firm growth rates tent-shaped? , 2003 .