Experimental Testing to Determine Concrete Fracture Energy Using Simple Laboratory Test Setup

Insight into reinforced concrete structural behavior can be provided and experimental investigation can be complemented by nonlinear finite element analysis. Specification of material parameters, including post-peak tensile response curve shape, fracture energy, and concrete tensile strength is typically required in a concrete structure finite element model's development. A number of different tests for fracture energy and post-cracking response determination has resulted from previous research. A very stiff, closed-loop test machine typically needs to be used in these methods so load application can be performed under displacement control since extremely brittle response is exhibited by test specimens. A recommended fracture energy test method was employed in a recently computed University of Washington study, with an open-loop testing machine and test specimens modified to include counterweights. Test-generated post-cracking response data and fracture energy data fall within the typically observed recommended test range. Additionally, the laboratory-observed load-displacement response was reproduced, with acceptable accuracy through using these data for concrete constitutive model calibration for nonlinear finite element analyses.

[1]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Size-effect method for determining fracture energy and process zone size of concrete , 1990 .

[2]  M. Elices,et al.  Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part 3—influence of cutting theP-δ tail , 1992 .

[3]  Rilem Determination of the fracture energy of mortar and concrete by means of three-point bend tests on notched beams , 1985 .

[4]  Cheng-Tzu Thomas Hsu,et al.  TRUE FRACTURE ENERGY OF CONCRETE , 1999 .

[5]  Comite Euro-International du Beton,et al.  CEB-FIP Model Code 1990 , 1993 .

[6]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Determination of Fracture Energy from Size Effect and Brittleness Number , 1987 .

[7]  Hiroshi Tada,et al.  The stress analysis of cracks handbook , 2000 .

[8]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Two Parameter Fracture Model for Concrete , 1985 .

[9]  Zdeněk P. Bažant,et al.  Statistical prediction of fracture parameters of concrete and implications for choice of testing standard , 2002 .

[10]  A. Hillerborg,et al.  Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements , 1976 .

[11]  David Darwin,et al.  Effects of Aggregate Type, Size, and Content on Concrete Strength and Fracture Energy , 1997 .

[12]  A. Hillerborg The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energyGF of concrete , 1985 .

[13]  Z. Bažant Size Effect in Blunt Fracture: Concrete, Rock, Metal , 1984 .

[14]  A. Ingraffea,et al.  Using numerical simulations to compare the fracture toughness values for concrete from the size-effect, two-parameter and fictitious crack models , 2003 .

[15]  Hans W. Reinhardt,et al.  Tensile Tests and Failure Analysis of Concrete , 1986 .

[16]  R. Borst,et al.  Non-orthogonal cracks in a smeared finite element model , 1985 .

[17]  M. Elices,et al.  Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part 2—Influence of bulk energy dissipation , 1992 .

[18]  L. Hui,et al.  SIZE EFFECT ON FRACTURE ENERGY OF CONCRETE DETERMINED BY THREE-POINT BENDING , 1997 .

[19]  G. E. Warren,et al.  Fracture energy for three-point-bend tests on single-edge-notched beams , 1988 .

[20]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Determination of fracture parameters (KIcs and CTODc) of plain concrete using three-point bend tests , 1990 .