Dynamic emergy accounting for assessing the environmental benefits of subtropical wetland stormwater management systems

An eco-hydrological model of a subtropical urbanizing watershed in south Florida, USA was developed to simulate solar emergy using H.T. Odum’s energy systems language as programmed in an iconographic simulation software (i.e., Extend ® )t o provide dynamic valuation of a wetland stormwater management system (WSMS). The solar emergy (i.e., ultimate amount of solar energy required to produce another form of energy) and emdollar (EM$, value an energy flow contributes to an economy based on its proportion of total emergy flow) values of watershed transpiration (a measure of productivity), surface discharge and change in landscape water storage were quantified for various ratios of wetland to upland areas, valuing wetlands in EM$ ha −1 y −1 . Simulation results indicated that integrating a WSMS into the watershed increased landscape productivity, decreased surface discharge and increased surface water storage. The eco-hydrological value of watershed productivity was 367 EM$ ha −1 y −1 when 10% of the watershed was wetland, which was an increase of 65 EM$ ha −1 y −1 (based on Florida’s emergy-to-dollar ratio in 1985, 2 × 10 12 sej $ −1 ). The annual contribution of this extra ecological productivity to public welfare was 12 million EM$, which was estimated from the product of eco-hydrological value and local emergy investment ratio of south Dade County (18:1). Average emdollar value of water saved per unit of wetland was 343 EM$ ha −1 y −1 . Dynamic emergy accounting provided distributions of solar transformities of hydrologic variables as opposed to more commonly used point estimates. Our work advances the temporal dynamic principles of emergy accounting by demonstrating how solar emergy may be continuously tracked through an ecosystem to estimate the value of nature’s life-support services. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  G. G. Parker,et al.  Water resources of southeastern Florida, with special reference to geology and ground water of the Miami area , 1955 .

[2]  B. Bakshi,et al.  Promise and problems of emergy analysis , 2004 .

[3]  D. Tilley.  National Metabolism and Communications Technology Development in the United States, 1790-2000 , 2006 .

[4]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H.T. Odum’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems , 2004 .

[5]  Jay F. Martin,et al.  Emergy evaluation of food production in urban residential landscapes , 2001, Urban Ecosystems.

[6]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy Analysis and Environmental Accounting , 2004 .

[7]  D. Tilley,et al.  Industrial Ecology and Ecological Engineering , 2003 .

[8]  J. B. Higgins,et al.  Emergy analysis of the Oak Openings region , 2003 .

[9]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Emergy evaluation of reforestation alternatives in Puerto Rico , 2000 .

[10]  M. T Brown,et al.  Embodied energy analysis and EMERGY analysis: a comparative view , 1996 .

[11]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Emergy Measures of Carrying Capacity to Evaluate Economic Investments , 2001 .

[12]  Daniel E. Campbell.  Emergy Analysis of Human Carrying Capacity and Regional Sustainability: an Example Using the State of Maine , 1998 .

[13]  Odum,et al.  Modeling for All Scales: An Introduction to System Simulation , 2000 .

[14]  P. Nilsson.  Environmental Accounting—EMERGY and Environmental Decision Making , 1997 .

[15]  H. Odum.  Ecological and general systems : an introduction to systems ecology , 1994 .

[16]  Helen H. Lou,et al.  Sustainability Assessment of Industrial Systems , 2004 .

[17]  A. Buenfil,et al.  EMERGY EVALUATION OF WATER , 2001 .

[18]  Robert A. Herendeen,et al.  Energy analysis and EMERGY analysis—a comparison , 2004 .

[19]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY INDEX , 2005, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[20]  Cristian Carraretto,et al.  Biodiesel as alternative fuel: Experimental analysis and energetic evaluations , 2004 .

[21]  D. Tilley,et al.  EMERGY-based environmental systems assessment of a multi-purpose temperate mixed-forest watershed of the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  Enrico Sciubba,et al.  Emergy and exergy analyses: Complementary methods or irreducible ideological options? , 2005 .

[23]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  A Comprehensive Energy and Economic Assessment of Biofuels: When “Green” Is Not Enough , 2001 .

[24]  Erika Felix,et al.  COMPARATIVE EMERGY EVALUATION OF CASTORBEAN ( RICINUS COMMUNIS ) PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN BRAZIL AND THE U , 2006 .

[25]  Johnnie E. Fish,et al.  Hydrogeology of the surficial aquifer system, Dade County, Florida , 1991 .

[26]  S. Doherty,et al.  Emergy evaluations of and limits to forest production , 1995 .

[27]  H. Odum,et al.  Self-Organization, Transformity, and Information , 1988, Science.

[28]  Nils S. Peterson,et al.  Simulation and evaluation with energy systems blocks , 1996 .

[29]  M. P. Bradley,et al.  Keeping the Books for Environmental Systems: An Emergy Analysis of West Virginia , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.