A Simulated Inverted Pendulum to Investigate Human Sensorimotor Control

Sensorimotor control regulates balance and stability as well as adaptation to the external environment. We introduce the use of a simulated inverted pendulum to study human sensorimotor control, demonstrating that this system introduces similar control challenges to human subjects as a physical inverted pendulum. Participants exhibited longer stabilization of the system as the pendulum length between the hand and the center of mass increased while the required control input varied in a non-monotonic, yet predictable manner. Finally, we show that the experimental results can be modelled as a PD controller with a time delay of $\tau = 140$ ms, matching the human visuomotor delay. Our results provide evidence of the importance of vision in a control of unstable systems and serve as a proof of concept of a simulated inverted pendulum.

[1]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  M. Kawato,et al.  Impedance control balances stability with metabolically costly muscle activation. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Rieko Osu,et al.  The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance , 2001, Nature.

[5]  D. Wolpert,et al.  When Feeling Is More Important Than Seeing in Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2002, Current Biology.

[6]  Juan Luis Cabrera,et al.  Human stick balancing: tuning Lèvy flights to improve balance control. , 2004, Chaos.

[7]  Pietro Morasso ‘Brute force’vs.‘gentle taps’ in the control of unstable loads , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Henrik Gollee,et al.  Human control of an inverted pendulum: Is continuous control necessary? Is intermittent control effective? Is intermittent control physiological? , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  Ian David Loram,et al.  Direct measurement of human ankle stiffness during quiet standing: the intrinsic mechanical stiffness is insufficient for stability , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  J. A. Pruszynski,et al.  Temporal evolution of "automatic gain-scaling". , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  David W. Franklin Impedance control: Learning stability in human sensorimotor control , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[12]  P. Morasso,et al.  Ankle muscle stiffness alone cannot stabilize balance during quiet standing. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Ian David Loram,et al.  The frequency of human, manual adjustments in balancing an inverted pendulum is constrained by intrinsic physiological factors , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Endpoint Stiffness of the Arm Is Directionally Tuned to Instability in the Environment , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  Forward models in visuomotor control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Sae Franklin,et al.  Temporal Evolution of Spatial Computations for Visuomotor Control , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.