Identifying the properties of ultra-soft materials using a new methodology of combined specimen-specific finite element model and optimization techniques

Abstract Development of novel protective helmets requires a better understanding of the mechanical properties of brain tissues. In this paper, a new methodology was developed using a reverse engineering (RE) based approach to identify the material properties for ultra-soft materials, such as human brain tissues, that are very difficult to cut into an accurate geometric shape necessary for engineering measurements. The basic idea behind this method is to include geometric effects by using a sample-specific finite element model in conjunction with a set of optimization procedures that allows systematic adjustments of material parameters until the calculated responses matched the measured ones. The experimental component consists of conducting simple uniaxial compression tests at two different loading rates to obtain force–displacement relationships, instead of the less accurate stress–strain curves, that could be used directly to minimize an objective function. The Shepard-k-Nearest method was employed to establish an approximated model (i.e. a response surface) and a genetic algorithm was used to search the optimal design variables (i.e. material parameters) in the design space. The optimized parameters were then used to describe the material behavior in a third sample-specific FE model and the model-predicted force–deflection data were compared with experimental data at a third loading rate that were not used for optimizing material parameters. This new approach makes it possible to identify material constants of ultra-soft biological tissues and engineering materials (e.g. silicone gels and rubbers) without using a large number of test samples.

[1]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[3]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Multi-directional optimisation against biomechanical criteria of a head–helmet coupling , 2006 .

[4]  R Willinger,et al.  Shear linear behavior of brain tissue over a large frequency range. , 2005, Biorheology.

[5]  A. King,et al.  Comparison of brain responses between frontal and lateral impacts by finite element modeling. , 2001, Journal of neurotrauma.

[6]  Sadayuki Hayashi,et al.  Mechanical Characterization of Brain Tissue in High-Rate Extension , 2008 .

[7]  S. Margulies,et al.  Age-dependent material properties of the porcine cerebrum: effect on pediatric inertial head injury criteria. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Kurosh Darvish,et al.  On the importance of nonlinearity of brain tissue under large deformations. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[9]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[10]  L. Cui,et al.  Optimisation of energy absorbing liner for equestrian helmets. Part II: Functionally graded foam liner , 2009 .

[11]  Marina Franulović,et al.  Genetic algorithm in material model parameters’ identification for low-cycle fatigue , 2009 .

[12]  A I King,et al.  Dynamic response of the human head to impact by three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  Scott Tashman,et al.  Brain/skull relative displacement magnitude due to blunt head impact: new experimental data and model , 1999 .

[14]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Validation of a 3D Anatomic Human Head Model and Replication of Head Impact in Motorcycle Accident by Finite Element Modeling , 1997 .

[15]  M. Prange,et al.  Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  Bertil Enquist,et al.  Identification of material hardening parameters by three-point bending of metal sheets , 2006 .

[17]  Svein Kleiven,et al.  Influence of impact direction on the human head in prediction of subdural hematoma. , 2003, Journal of neurotrauma.

[18]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  Finite-element analysis of bicycle helmet oblique impacts , 2008 .

[19]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Finite element modelling of skull fractures caused by direct impact , 2000 .

[20]  A. King,et al.  A NEW MODEL COMPARING IMPACT RESPONSES OF THE HOMOGENEOUS AND INHOMOGENEOUS HUMAN BRAIN , 1995 .

[21]  Hugo Sol,et al.  Material parameter identification of sandwich beams by an inverse method , 2006 .

[22]  P. Manach,et al.  Material parameters identification: Gradient-based, genetic and hybrid optimization algorithms , 2008 .

[23]  M. Laberge,et al.  Sliding Friction Analysis of Phosphatidylcholine as a Boundary Lubricant for Articular Cartilage , 1993, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[24]  L. Cui,et al.  Optimisation of energy absorbing liner for equestrian helmets , 2009 .

[25]  Shaw Voon Wong,et al.  A new motorcycle helmet liner material: The finite element simulation and design of experiment optimization , 2007 .

[26]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  On the Development of the SIMon Finite Element Head Model. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[27]  A A Sauren,et al.  The applicability of the time/temperature superposition principle to brain tissue. , 1997, Biorheology.

[28]  A. W. Schopper,et al.  Analysis of effects of friction on the deformation behavior of soft tissues in unconfined compression tests. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  B. Donnelly,et al.  Shear properties of human brain tissue. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[30]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  Albert I. King,et al.  VISCOELASTIC RESPONSE OF THE HUMAN BRAIN TO SAGITTAL AND LATERAL ROTATIONAL ACCELERATION BY FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS , 1997 .

[32]  Svein Kleiven,et al.  Evaluation of head response to ballistic helmet impacts using the finite element method , 2007 .

[33]  J. Greer,et al.  Voltage-sensitive calcium currents and their role in regulating phrenic motoneuron electrical excitability during the perinatal period. , 2001, Journal of neurobiology.

[34]  Takeo Matsumoto,et al.  Mechanical Characterization of Brain Tissue in High-Rate Compression , 2007 .

[35]  J. Gelin,et al.  Identification of material parameters directly from metal forming processes , 1998 .