Using model order reduction to accelerate optimization of multi-stage linear dynamical systems

Simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography, an important technique for separating chemical compounds, is usually modeled by a multi-stage dynamical system. After a transient phase, an SMB usually reaches a cyclic steady state (CSS), which is of central interest in the analysis of SMB systems. Therefore, computation of the CSS under a given parameter vector requires simulating a relatively high-order SMB model repeatedly, and is therefore already computationally expensive. Optimization of the operating condition requires evaluating the CSS’s at all iterates and is computationally even more challenging. In our previous work, we proposed to use Krylov-type model order reduction methods, i.e., a straightforward method along with a partial-update strategy (Yue, Li, Feng, Seidel-Morgenstern, & Benner 2014) and a subspace-exploiting strategy (Li, Yue, Feng, Seidel-Morgenstern, & Benner 2014), to speed up SMB analysis. This paper puts these results into a more general mathematical framework of using projection-based model order reduction methods, especially Krylov-type methods, to reduce linear multi-stage systems. Special attention is paid to computation and optimization of the CSS. We also show that the two strategies can be combined to achieve an even better speedup. The efficiency of our methods is validated by numerical optimization of a linear SMB system.

[1]  Karl Meerbergen,et al.  The Solution of Parametrized Symmetric Linear Systems , 2002, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[2]  Karen Willcox,et al.  A Survey of Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Systems ∗ , 2013 .

[3]  Michel Kinnaert,et al.  POD-based state estimation of simulated moving bed chromatographic processes , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[4]  Malte Kaspereit,et al.  New Developments in Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography , 2008 .

[5]  Wha Wil Schilders,et al.  Practical issues of model order reduction with Krylov-subspace methods , 2004 .

[6]  Hariprasad J. Subramani,et al.  A Monte Carlo-based error propagation analysis of Simulated Moving Bed systems , 2008 .

[7]  Athanasios C. Antoulas,et al.  Approximation of Large-Scale Dynamical Systems , 2005, Advances in Design and Control.

[8]  Roland W. Freund,et al.  Efficient linear circuit analysis by Pade´ approximation via the Lanczos process , 1994, EURO-DAC '94.

[9]  G. Dünnebier,et al.  Optimal Design and Operation of Simulated Moving Bed Chromatographic Reactors , 2000 .

[10]  Peter Benner,et al.  Using surrogate models for efficient optimization of simulated moving bed chromatography , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[11]  Arvind Rajendran,et al.  Simulated moving bed chromatography for the separation of enantiomers. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[13]  Peter Benner,et al.  Model reduction for linear simulated moving bed chromatography systems using Krylov-subspace methods , 2014 .

[14]  Z. Bai Krylov subspace techniques for reduced-order modeling of large-scale dynamical systems , 2002 .

[15]  Luís S. Pais,et al.  Cyclic steady state of simulated moving bed processes for enantiomers separation , 2003 .

[16]  W. Arnoldi The principle of minimized iterations in the solution of the matrix eigenvalue problem , 1951 .

[17]  José P. B. Mota,et al.  Use of Single-Column Models for Efficient Computation of the Periodic State of a Simulated Moving-Bed Process , 2006 .