Outcomes in adults with bicuspid aortic valves.

CONTEXT Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common congenital cardiac anomaly in the adult population. Cardiac outcomes in a contemporary population of adults with bicuspid aortic valve have not been systematically determined. OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency and predictors of cardiac outcomes in a large consecutive series of adults with bicuspid aortic valve. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cohort study examining cardiac outcomes in 642 consecutive ambulatory adults (mean [SD] age, 35 [16] years; 68% male) with bicuspid aortic valve presenting to a Canadian congenital cardiac center from 1994 through 2001 and followed up for a mean (SD) period of 9 (5) years. Frequency and predictors of major cardiac events were determined by multivariate analysis. Mortality rate in the study group was compared with age- and sex-matched population estimates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mortality and cause of death were determined. Primary cardiac events were defined as the occurrence of any of the following complications: cardiac death, intervention on the aortic valve or ascending aorta, aortic dissection or aneurysm, or congestive heart failure requiring hospital admission during the follow-up period. RESULTS During the follow-up period, there were 28 deaths (mean [SD], 4% [1%]). One or more primary cardiac events occurred in 161 patients (mean [SD], 25% [2%]), which included cardiac death in 17 patients (mean [SD], 3% [1%]), intervention on aortic valve or ascending aorta in 142 patients (mean [SD], 22% [2%]), aortic dissection or aneurysm in 11 patients (mean [SD], 2% [1%]), or congestive heart failure requiring hospital admission in 16 patients (mean [SD], 2% [1%]). Independent predictors of primary cardiac events were age older than 30 years (hazard ratio [HR], 3.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.15-4.19; P<.001), moderate or severe aortic stenosis (HR, 5.67; 95% CI, 4.16-7.80; P<.001), and moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (HR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.93-3.76; P<.001). The 10-year survival rate of the study group (mean [SD], 96% [1%]) was not significantly different from population estimates (mean [SD], 97% [1%]; P = .71). At last follow-up, 280 patients (mean [SD], 45% [2%]) had dilated aortic sinus and/or ascending aorta. CONCLUSIONS In this study population of young adults with bicuspid aortic valve, age, severity of aortic stenosis, and severity of aortic regurgitation were independently associated with primary cardiac events. Over the mean follow-up duration of 9 years, survival rates were not lower than for the general population.

[1]  W. Roberts,et al.  The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. A study of 85 autopsy cases. , 1970, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  M. Ferencik,et al.  Changes in size of ascending aorta and aortic valve function with time in patients with congenitally bicuspid aortic valves. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  S. Atalay,et al.  The prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve in newborns by echocardiographic screening. , 2005, American Heart Journal.

[4]  R. Levine,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. , 2003, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[5]  Paul Khairy,et al.  Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and interventions in the young. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Eli Konen,et al.  Coarctation of the aorta before and after correction: the role of cardiovascular MRI. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  J. Carr,et al.  Orthogonal measurement of thoracic aorta luminal diameter using ECG‐gated high‐resolution contrast‐enhanced MR angiography , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  J. Bavaria,et al.  Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. , 2000, Circulation.

[9]  P. Byers,et al.  Usefulness of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype to predict elastic properties of the ascending aorta. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  C. Ward.  Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve , 2000, Heart.

[11]  M. Schemper,et al.  Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  K. Eagle,et al.  Characterizing the young patient with aortic dissection: results from the International Registry of Aortic Dissection (IRAD). , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  R. Ramaraj.  Congenital aortic stenosis in adults: rate of progression and predictors of clinical outcome. , 2009, International journal of cardiology.

[14]  R R Miller,et al.  A New, Simplified and Accurate Method for Determining Ejection Fraction with Two‐dimensional Echocardiography , 1981, Circulation.

[15]  M. Prokop,et al.  Follow-up of adults with coarctation of the aorta: comparison of helical CT and MRI, and impact on assessing diameter changes. , 2004, Chest.

[16]  J. Child,et al.  Left ventricular outflow obstruction: subaortic stenosis, bicuspid aortic valve, supravalvar aortic stenosis, and coarctation of the aorta. , 2006, Circulation.

[17]  T. Rea,et al.  A Community-Based Study , 2004 .

[18]  B. Mulder,et al.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference 2001 update: Recommendations for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease--Part II. , 2001, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[19]  S. Colan,et al.  Morphology of bicuspid aortic valve in children and adolescents. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  W. Roberts,et al.  Frequency by Decades of Unicuspid, Bicuspid, and Tricuspid Aortic Valves in Adults Having Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis, With or Without Associated Aortic Regurgitation , 2005, Circulation.

[21]  Richard B Devereux,et al.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardio , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[22]  C M Otto,et al.  Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. , 1997, Circulation.

[23]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Natural History of Asymptomatic Patients With Normally Functioning or Minimally Dysfunctional Bicuspid Aortic Valve in the Community , 2008, Circulation.

[24]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Mechanisms underlying aortic dilatation in congenital aortic valve malformation. , 1999, Circulation.

[25]  W. Edwards,et al.  Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: a surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases. , 1999, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[26]  J. Lindsay,et al.  Coarctation of the aorta, bicuspid aortic valve and abnormal ascending aortic wall. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  D. Manuel,et al.  Burden of cardiovascular disease in Canada. , 2003, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[28]  D. Manuel,et al.  Health-related quality of life and health-adjusted life expectancy of people with diabetes in Ontario, Canada, 1996-1997. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[29]  M. Cheitlin,et al.  Congenital bicuspid aortic valve after age 20. , 1977, The American journal of cardiology.

[30]  V. Ho,et al.  Aortic Dilatation and Dissection in Turner Syndrome , 2007, Circulation.

[31]  G. Thiene,et al.  Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves , 1999, Heart.

[32]  Vivekanand Allada,et al.  Frequency of aortic root dilation in children with a bicuspid aortic valve. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  K. Bailey,et al.  Outcome of 622 Adults With Asymptomatic, Hemodynamically Significant Aortic Stenosis During Prolonged Follow-Up , 2005, Circulation.

[34]  M. Davies,et al.  The natural history of a non-stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. , 1978, British heart journal.