The influence of lumbar disc height and cross-sectional area on the mechanical response of the disc to physiologic loading.

STUDY DESIGN The influence of lumbar disc height and cross-sectional area on the mechanical response of the disc to physiologic loading was determined using a finite element model. OBJECTIVES To identify which geometric characteristics are potentially related to motion segment mechanical response to applied load, such as flexibility, fiber stress, disc bulge, and nucleus pressure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The height and area of the lumbar disc varies within the disc itself, between disc levels, between people, between men and women, with aging, and during the day. Mechanical theory dictates that the height and area influence the mechanical response of the disc to loading. This could have important consequences in risk of injury. METHODS Three-dimensional finite-element models representing three disc heights (5.5 mm, 8.5 mm, and 10.5 mm) and three disc areas (1060 mm2, 1512 mm2, and 1885 mm2) were generated. The effect of disc geometry on the mechanical properties of the disc were studied for four moment loads (magnitude, 7.5 Nm) with compressive preload (400 N) and for three different direct forces. Commercially available finite-element software was used. RESULTS Discs with a ratio of small disc area to disc height were more prone to larger motion, higher anular fiber stresses, and larger disc bulge. When the disc height alone was increased by a factor, its flexibility also increased, either by the same amount or by a much larger ratio. CONCLUSIONS Discs with the most height and smallest area are exposed to much higher risk of failure than other combinations of disc height and geometry.

[1]  Y. E. Kim,et al.  An Analytical Investigation of the Mechanics of Spinal Instrumentation , 1988, Spine.

[2]  C HIRSCH,et al.  Studies on structural changes in the lumbar annulus fibrosus. , 1952, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[3]  P Brinckmann,et al.  Change of disc height, radial disc bulge, and intradiscal pressure from discectomy. An in vitro investigation on human lumbar discs. , 1991, Spine.

[4]  Hutton Wc,et al.  Can variations in intervertebral disc height affect the mechanical function of the disc , 1996 .

[5]  F. Hartmann,et al.  Biomechanical properties of human intervertebral discs subjected to axial dynamic compression--influence of age and degeneration. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  P. De Puky,et al.  The Physiological Oscillation of the Length of the Body , 1935 .

[7]  W. Hutton,et al.  Diurnal Variations in the Stresses on the Lumbar Spine , 1987, Spine.

[8]  O Lindahl,et al.  Mechanical properties of dried defatted spongy bone. , 1976, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[9]  F. Hartmann,et al.  Biomechanical Properties of Human Intervertebral Discs Subjected to Axial Dynamic Compression: A Comparison of Lumbar and Thoracic Discs , 1984, Spine.

[10]  F. Hartmann,et al.  Biomechanical behavior of human intervertebral discs subjected to long lasting axial loading. , 1984, Biorheology.

[11]  M. Adams,et al.  Gradual Disc Prolapse , 1985, Spine.

[12]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Effects of Disc Injury on Mechanical Behavior of the Human Spine , 1984, Spine.

[13]  R. Sanjeevi,et al.  A viscoelastic model for collagen fibres. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Amonoo-Kuofi Hs,et al.  Morphometric changes in the heights and anteroposterior diameters of the lumbar intervertebral discs with age. , 1991 .

[15]  N. Langrana,et al.  Role of Ligaments and Facets in Lumbar Spinal Stability , 1995, Spine.

[16]  W. Hutton,et al.  Diurnal changes in spinal mechanics and their clinical significance. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  A. Schultz,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Human Lumbar Spine Motion Segments: Influences of Age, Sex, Disc Level, and Degeneration , 1979, Spine.