Studying Well-being and its Environmental Impacts: A Case Study of Minimum Income Receivers in Finland

Current well-being research often overlooks human dependency on natural resources and undervalues the way environmental impacts affect human activities. This article argues that the capability approach provides an applicable framework for inquiring into ecologically sustainable well-being. Therefore, this pilot study aims to develop a research method for integrating the measurement of natural resource use with capability-based well-being research. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 18 Finnish minimum income receivers and their natural resource use (material footprints) was measured in five central functionings by using the Material Input Per Unit of Service (MIPS) method. The connections between capabilities, functionings and material footprints are interpreted from a person-centered perspective in order to explain the individual variety in material footprints. The results show that the material footprints of minimum income receivers are smaller than with an average Finn but they still exceed what is estimated to be an ecologically sustainable level of natural resource use.

[1]  P. Burger,et al.  A Sustainability-Fitting Interpretation of the Capability Approach: Integrating the Natural Dimension by Employing Feedback Loops , 2013 .

[2]  Friedrich Schmidt-Bleek,et al.  Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? : MIPS-das Maß für ökologisches Wirtschaften , 1994 .

[3]  Holger Rohn,et al.  Technologien, Produkte und Strategien : Ergebnisse der Potenzialanalysen , 2010 .

[4]  Maria J. Welfens,et al.  MAIA : Einführung in die Material-Intensitäts-Analyse nach dem MIPS-Konzept , 1998 .

[5]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Material Footprint of Low-Income Households in Finland—Consequences for the Sustainability Debate , 2012 .

[6]  I. Robeyns.  The Capability Approach in Practice , 2006 .

[7]  Felix Rauschmayer,et al.  Beyond “benefits”? Looking at ecosystem services through the capability approach , 2012 .

[8]  Séverine Deneulin.  The Capability Approach: Beyond individual freedom and agency: structures of living together in the capability approach , 2008 .

[9]  O. Mont,et al.  The Impacts of Household Consumption and Options for Change , 2010 .

[10]  S. Bringezu,et al.  Major material flows associated with orange juice consumption in Germany , 1993 .

[11]  Stefan Giljum,et al.  A comprehensive set of resource use indicators from the micro to the macro level , 2011 .

[12]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Europe s resource use : basic trends, global and sectoral patterns and environmental and socioeconomic impacts , 2009 .

[13]  Andrew Crabtree.  Sustainable Development: Does the Capability Approach have Anything to Offer? Outlining a Legitimate Freedom Approach , 2013 .

[14]  M. Nussbaum,et al.  Book reviews , 2002 .

[15]  Senja Laakso.  Onko elämä perusturvan varassa kestävää? : Ympäristövara ekologisesti ja sosiaalisesti kestävän kulutuksen tarkastelussa , 2011 .

[16]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Transport MIPS – The natural resource concumption of the Finnish transport system , 2006 .

[17]  J. Bond,et al.  Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: preferences or capabilities? , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[18]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Natural resource consumption of tourism : case study on free time residences and hotel accommodation in Finland , 2008 .

[19]  Felix Rauschmayer,et al.  Re-conceptualizing Sustainable Development on the Basis of the Capability Approach: A Model and Its Difficulties , 2013 .

[20]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress , 2011 .

[21]  Sophie Spillemaeckers,et al.  From Individual Well-Being to Sustainable Development. A Path Where Psychologists and Economists Meet , 2010 .

[22]  Fabiola Riccardini,et al.  How's life? : measuring well-being , 2011 .

[23]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[24]  R. Moss,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment , 2003 .

[25]  Björn Halleröd.  Sour Grapes: Relative Deprivation, Adaptive Preferences and the Measurement of Poverty , 2006, Journal of Social Policy.

[26]  Amartya Sen.  Human Rights and Capabilities , 2005 .

[27]  S. Alkire.  The Capability Approach: Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative analyses , 2008 .

[28]  Kenneth Nelson,et al.  Eroding minimum income protection in the Nordic countries? Reassessing the Nordic model of social assistance , 2011 .

[29]  J. Ballet,et al.  Sustainable Human Development and the Capability Approach: Integrating Environment, Responsibility and Collective Agency , 2013 .

[30]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Visions of a sustainable resource use , 2009 .

[31]  J. Klugman.  Human Development Report 2011. Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All , 2011 .

[32]  Amartya Sen,et al.  The Ends and Means of Sustainability , 2013 .

[33]  O. Lundberg,et al.  The role of welfare state principles and generosity in social policy programmes for public health: an international comparative study , 2008, The Lancet.

[34]  Paul Burger,et al.  Towards a capability approach of sustainability , 2011 .

[35]  B. Zimmermann.  Pragmatism and the Capability Approach , 2006 .

[36]  C. Kerstenetzky,et al.  Poverty as Deprivation of Freedom: The Case of Vidigal Shantytown in Rio de Janeiro , 2009 .

[37]  I. Robeyns.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Human Development the Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey the Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey , 2022 .

[38]  Holger Rohn,et al.  Resource productivity in 7 steps: How to develop eco-innovative products and services and improve their material footprint , 2009 .

[39]  Otto Bird.  The Idea of Justice , 1967 .

[40]  Stephan Moll,et al.  Material flow analysis, TMR and the MIPS concept: a contribution to the development of indicators for measuring changes in consumption and production patterns , 1999 .

[41]  Sophie Spillemaeckers,et al.  With a focus on well-being and capabilities , 2010 .

[42]  S. Yoon,et al.  Women and Human Development. , 2003 .

[43]  Jenny Hall.  Interpreting qualitative data , 2010 .

[44]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Household MIPS : natural resource consumption of Finnish households and its reduction , 2008 .

[45]  Tim Jackson,et al.  The bare necessities: How much household carbon do we really need? , 2010, Ecological Economics.

[46]  A. Sen,et al.  Capability and Well-Being , 1991 .

[47]  G. H. Brundtland.  World Commission on environment and development , 1985 .

[48]  Michael Ritthoff,et al.  Calculating MIPS : resource productivity of products and services , 2002 .

[49]  David A. Crocker,et al.  Capability and agency , 2009 .

[50]  Kristiina Aalto,et al.  What is the cost of living? - Reference budgets for a decent minimum standard of living in Finland , 2011 .

[51]  K. Watene.  Nussbaum's Capability Approach and Future Generations , 2013 .

[52]  Wouter Peeters,et al.  Putting Sustainability into Sustainable Human Development , 2013 .

[53]  M. Turshen.  Development as Freedom , 2001 .

[54]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet , 2011 .