Competitive Tendering as a Contracting Mechanism for Subsidising Transport: The Bus Experience

Competitive tendering (CT) is a popular mechanism for the provision of transport services where a major objective is the containment of the cost to government of service provision. Although the primary focus is recognised as cost efficiency, whereby the cost outcome should be conditional on a given level of service, difficulties in establishing appropriate tests for service level compliance has become a cause of concern regarding the effectiveness of the CT paradigm as a value for money initiative. This paper reviews the international successes and failures of CT as a subsidy reduction strategy within the bus sector, and promotes the idea of Performance Based Contracts as a way of recognising the real role of subsidy under the umbrella of a value for money objective. © 2005 LSE and the University of Bath

[1]  J. Berechman Public transit economics and deregulation policy , 1993 .

[2]  Kjell Werner Johansen Contractual Form and Performance in the Norwegian Bus Industry 1986-96 , 1999 .

[3]  Bård Norheim Competitive pressure as an alternative to competitive tendering? The development of a performance contract in Oslo , 1999 .

[4]  Joaquim José Guilherme de Aragão,et al.  The Brazilian Urban Bus Industry: Present Challenges and Future Perspectives , 1999 .

[5]  Odd I. Larsen,et al.  TOWARDS ACHIEVEMENT OF BOTH ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY AND X-EFFICIENCY IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT , 2001 .

[6]  John Preston,et al.  An overview of public transport reforms in Great Britain and forecasts for the future , 2001 .

[7]  Wendell Cox,et al.  Competition In Urban Public Transport A World View , 2001 .

[8]  E. Carlquist,et al.  Incentive Contracts in Norwegian Local Public Transport: The Hordaland Model , 2001 .

[9]  I. Wallis,et al.  Economic Incentives to Increase Public Transport Patronage – The Theory and the Practice , 2001 .

[10]  Ian Wallis,et al.  Competitive Tendering for Bus Services: The Improved Adelaide Model , 2001 .

[11]  T. Palva,et al.  Pages 36-44 , 2001 .

[12]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Urban public transport delivery in Australia: issues and challenges in retaining and growing patronage , 2002 .

[13]  D. Hensher,et al.  PERFORMANCE-BASED QUALITY CONTRACTS IN BUS SERVICE PROVISION , 2003 .

[14]  Carlo Cambini,et al.  Competitive Tendering and Optimal Size in the Regional Bus Transportation Industry: An Example from Italy , 2003 .

[15]  Jürgen Klarmann Tendering problems of suburban rail systems , 2003 .

[16]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Performance Based Contracts , 2004 .

[17]  Didier M Van de Velde,et al.  First Experience with Tendering at the Tactical Level (Service Design) in Dutch Public Transport , 2005 .

[18]  V. Velde,et al.  The Evolution of Organizational Forms in European Public Transport During the Last 15 years , 2005 .

[19]  D. Hensher,et al.  Negotiated and Competitively Tendered Performance-Based Contracts , 2005 .

[20]  I. Wallis Patronage Incentives in Urban Public Transport Contracts -- Appraisal of Practice and Experience to Date , 2005 .

[21]  D. Hensher,et al.  Performance Based Contracts in Public Transportation , 2005 .

[22]  John Preston,et al.  The road to Rio: a brief history of the international conferences on competition and ownership in land passenger transport. , 2005 .

[23]  Carlo Cambini,et al.  To bid or not to bid, this is the question: the Italian experience in competitive tendering for local bus services , 2006 .

[24]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Performance-based quality contracts for the bus sector: delivering social and commercial value for money , 2004 .