Situational and Dispositional Determinants of Intentional Deceiving

Does opportunity make the thief or are people dispositionally prone to deceive? The interaction between personality and the circumstances surrounding deception is crucial to understand what promotes dishonesty in our society. Due to its inherent spontaneity and sociality, deceptive behaviour may be hardly reproducible in experimental settings. We developed a novel paradigm in the form of an interactive game where participants can choose whether to lie to another person in situations of loss vs. gain, and of no-reputation-risk vs. reputation-risk linked to the disclosure of their deceptive behaviour to others. Thus, our ecological paradigm allowed subjects to spontaneously decide when to lie and face the challenge of deceiving others. In the case of loss, participants lied to reverse the outcome in their favour. Deception was lower in the reputation-risk condition where personality traits concerning social interactions also played an important role. The results suggest that deception is definitely promoted by unfavourable events, and that maintaining one's own reputation encourages honesty, particularly in socially inclined individuals.

[1]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[2]  Giorgio Ganis,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of deception , 2009, Social neuroscience.

[3]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game , 2010, ArXiv.

[4]  C. Frith,et al.  The production and detection of deception in an interactive game , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Alternative mechanisms for regulating racial responses according to internal vs external cues. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[6]  Nina Mazar,et al.  The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance , 2008 .

[7]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Lying in everyday life. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Too Tired to Tell the Truth: Self-Control Resource Depletion and Dishonesty. , 2009, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[9]  C. Robert Cloninger A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. A proposal. , 1987, Archives of general psychiatry.

[10]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Who lies? , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  An Individual Difference Measure of Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions , 1997 .

[12]  Ray Bull,et al.  The impact of individual differences on perceptions of lying in everyday life and in a high stake situation , 2001 .

[13]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary Establishment of Moral and Double Moral Standards through Spatial Interactions , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Single-trial discrimination of truthful from deceptive responses during a game of financial risk using alpha-band MEG signals , 2006, NeuroImage.

[15]  C. Frith,et al.  Detecting deception: the scope and limits , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Randy Genereux,et al.  Predicting the acceptability and likelihood of lying: The interaction of personality with type of lie , 2008 .

[17]  N. Sadato,et al.  Processing of Social and Monetary Rewards in the Human Striatum , 2008, Neuron.

[18]  R. Kurzban,et al.  Audience effects on moralistic punishment , 2007 .

[19]  C. R. Cloninger,et al.  The temperament and character inventory (TCI) : a guide to its development and use , 1994 .

[20]  L. Vaughn,et al.  Reducing the Expression of Racial Prejudice , 1991 .

[21]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[22]  Joseph M. Paxton,et al.  Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  M. J. Monteith,et al.  The Effect of Social Norm Activation on the Expression of Opinions Concerning Gay Men and Blacks , 1996 .

[24]  David Nyberg,et al.  The varnished truth : truth telling and deceiving in ordinary life , 1994 .

[25]  C. Hauert,et al.  Reward and punishment , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Lamar Pierce,et al.  Dishonesty in the Name of Equity , 2009, Psychological science.

[27]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Coevolutionary Games - A Mini Review , 2009, Biosyst..

[28]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[29]  Cloninger Cr A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: A proposal. , 1987 .

[30]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Punish, but not too hard: how costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game , 2010, 1007.0431.

[31]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[32]  P. Devine,et al.  Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice , 1998 .

[33]  D. Fessler,et al.  Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. , 2005 .

[34]  Gian Vittorio Caprara,et al.  Moral civic disengagement and values , 2005 .

[35]  P. Richerson,et al.  The evolution of indirect reciprocity , 1989 .