A mobile app for postoperative wound care after arthroplasty: Ease of use and perceived usefulness

BACKGROUND Early postoperative discharge after joint arthroplasty may lead to decreased wound monitoring. A mobile woundcare app with an integrated algorithm to detect complications may lead to improved monitoring and earlier treatment of complications. In this study, the ease of use and perceived usefulness of such a mobile app was investigated. OBJECTIVE Primary objective was to investigate the ease of use and perceived usefulness of using a woundcare app. Secondary objectives were the number of alerts created, the amount of days the app was actually used and patient-reported wound infection. METHODS Patients that received a joint arthroplasty were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. During 30 postoperative days, patients scored their surgical wound by daily answering of questions in the app. An inbuilt algorithm advised patients to contact their treating physician if needed. On day 15 and day 30, additional questionnaires in the app investigated ease of use and perceived usefulness. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients were included. Median age was 68 years. Forty-one patients (59.4%) used the app until day 30. Mean grade for ease of use (on a Likert-scale of 1-5) were 4.2 on day 15 and 4.2 on day 30; grades for perceived usefulness were 4.1 on day 15 and 4.0 on day 30. Out of 1317 days of app use, an alert was sent to patients on 29 days (2.2%). Concordance between patient-reported outcome and physician-reported outcome was 80%. CONCLUSIONS Introduction of a woundcare app with an alert communication on possible wound problems resulted in a high perceived usefulness and ease of use. Future studies will focus on validation of the algorithm and the association between postoperative wound leakage and the incidence of prosthetic joint infection.

[1]  Jason T. Wiseman,et al.  Conceptualizing smartphone use in outpatient wound assessment: patients' and caregivers' willingness to use technology. , 2014, The Journal of surgical research.

[2]  P. Coyte,et al.  Effect of Home Monitoring via Mobile App on the Number of In-Person Visits Following Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA surgery.

[3]  M. Charlson,et al.  Mobile health apps and recovery after surgery: What are patients willing to do? , 2017, American Journal of Surgery.

[4]  A. Widmer New developments in diagnosis and treatment of infection in orthopedic implants. , 2001, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[5]  Stephanie J. Fonda,et al.  Assessment of patient engagement with a mobile application among service members in transition , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[7]  Brent I Fox,et al.  Engaging Patients with Digital Tools: What We Think We Know , 2014, Hospital pharmacy.

[8]  T. Hansen Fast track in hip arthroplasty , 2017, EFORT open reviews.

[9]  Kamal Jethwani,et al.  The Impact of Using Mobile-Enabled Devices on Patient Engagement in Remote Monitoring Programs , 2013, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[10]  Rajwinder Kaur,et al.  Factors influencing Hong Kong Chinese patients' decision-making in seeking early treatment for acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, Research in nursing & health.

[11]  L. Nordsletten,et al.  A Trend for Increased Risk of Revision Surgery due to Deep Infection following Fast-Track Hip Arthroplasty , 2016, Advances in orthopedics.

[12]  R. Lopes,et al.  Impact of smartphone digital photography, email, and media communication on emergency room visits post-hypospadias repair. , 2017, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[13]  C. Childs,et al.  A systematic review of surgical infection scoring systems used in surgical patients , 2011, JBI library of systematic reviews.

[14]  H. Schønheyder,et al.  The “true” incidence of surgically treated deep prosthetic joint infection after 32,896 primary total hip arthroplasties , 2015, Acta orthopaedica.

[15]  C. Harvey,et al.  Post-operative telephone review is cost-effective and acceptable to patients , 2010, The Ulster medical journal.

[16]  M. Stevens,et al.  LEAK study: design of a nationwide randomised controlled trial to find the best way to treat wound leakage after primary hip and knee arthroplasty , 2017, BMJ Open.

[17]  William B. Lober,et al.  Patient Perspectives on Post-Discharge Surgical Site Infections: Towards a Patient-Centered Mobile Health Solution , 2014, PloS one.