Cell Adhesion, Morphology, and Metabolism Variation via Acoustic Exposure within Microfluidic Cell Handling Systems

Abstract Acoustic fields are capable of manipulating biological samples contained within the enclosed and highly controlled environment of a microfluidic chip in a versatile manner. The use of acoustic streaming to alter fluid flows and radiation forces to control cell locations has important clinical and life science applications. While there have been significant advances in the fundamental implementation of these acoustic mechanisms, there is a considerable lack of understanding of the associated biological effects on cells. Typically a single, simple viability assay is used to demonstrate a high proportion of living cells. However, the findings of this study demonstrate that acoustic exposure can inhibit cell attachment, decrease cell spreading, and most intriguingly increase cellular metabolic activity, all without any impact upon viability rates. This has important implications by showing that mortality studies alone are inadequate for the assessment of biocompatibility, but further demonstrates that physical manipulation of cells can also be used to influence their biological activity.

[1]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Holographic acoustic elements for manipulation of levitated objects , 2015, Nature Communications.

[2]  Jason P. Gleghorn,et al.  Microfluidic scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2007, Nature materials.

[3]  David J. Collins,et al.  Batch process particle separation using surface acoustic waves (SAW): integration of travelling and standing SAW , 2016 .

[4]  Thomas Laurell,et al.  Microchannel Acoustophoresis does not Impact Survival or Function of Microglia, Leukocytes or Tumor Cells , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  Lisheng Xu,et al.  Sonoporation of Cells by a Parallel Stable Cavitation Microbubble Array , 2019, Advanced science.

[6]  Kathy Qian Luo,et al.  High Shear Stresses under Exercise Condition Destroy Circulating Tumor Cells in a Microfluidic System , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[7]  V. Moy,et al.  Mechanical properties of L929 cells measured by atomic force microscopy: effects of anticytoskeletal drugs and membrane crosslinking. , 2006, Scanning.

[8]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[9]  P. Gascoyne,et al.  Particle separation by dielectrophoresis , 2002, Electrophoresis.

[10]  Tuncay Alan,et al.  The importance of travelling wave components in standing surface acoustic wave (SSAW) systems. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[11]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  A. Neild,et al.  Acoustic tweezing of particles using decaying opposing travelling surface acoustic waves (DOTSAW). , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[13]  A. Neild,et al.  Huygens-Fresnel Acoustic Interference and the Development of Robust Time-Averaged Patterns from Traveling Surface Acoustic Waves. , 2017, Physical Review Letters.

[14]  I-Kao Chiang,et al.  On-chip manipulation of single microparticles, cells, and organisms using surface acoustic waves , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Pietro Giovanoli,et al.  Current and emerging vascularization strategies in skin tissue engineering , 2017, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[16]  The Effect of Anti-aging Peptides on Mechanical and Biological Properties of HaCaT Keratinocytes , 2017, International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics.

[17]  Aaron R Wheeler,et al.  Microfluidic device for single-cell analysis. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Combined microfluidic-micromagnetic separation of living cells in continuous flow , 2006, Biomedical microdevices.

[19]  Bidisha Sinha,et al.  Cholesterol Depletion by MβCD Enhances Cell Membrane Tension and Its Variations-Reducing Integrity , 2019, Biophysical journal.

[20]  David J. Collins,et al.  Two-dimensional single-cell patterning with one cell per well driven by surface acoustic waves , 2015, Nature Communications.

[21]  Dino Di Carlo,et al.  Microfluidic Cell Sorting and Separation Technology , 2017 .

[22]  J. Sturm,et al.  Deterministic hydrodynamics: Taking blood apart , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  W. L. Ung,et al.  Enhanced surface acoustic wave cell sorting by 3D microfluidic-chip design. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[24]  M. Digman,et al.  Collagen density modulates triple-negative breast cancer cell metabolism through adhesion-mediated contractility , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[25]  A. Neild,et al.  Self-Aligned Acoustofluidic Particle Focusing and Patterning in Microfluidic Channels from Channel-Based Acoustic Waveguides. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[26]  Joel Voldman,et al.  Iso-acoustic focusing of cells for size-insensitive acousto-mechanical phenotyping , 2016, Nature Communications.

[27]  A. Wixforth,et al.  Acoustotaxis -in vitro stimulation in a wound healing assay employing surface acoustic waves. , 2016, Biomaterials science.

[28]  M. Berridge,et al.  Characterization of the cellular reduction of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT): subcellular localization, substrate dependence, and involvement of mitochondrial electron transport in MTT reduction. , 1993, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[29]  Jin Ho Jung,et al.  Microchannel anechoic corner for size-selective separation and medium exchange via traveling surface acoustic waves. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[30]  A. Neild,et al.  Versatile platform for performing protocols on a chip utilizing surface acoustic wave (SAW) driven mixing. , 2019, Lab on a chip.

[31]  T. Huang,et al.  Cell separation using tilted-angle standing surface acoustic waves , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  David J. Collins,et al.  Flow-rate-insensitive deterministic particle sorting using a combination of travelling and standing surface acoustic waves , 2016 .

[33]  Joel Voldman,et al.  Caring for cells in microsystems: principles and practices of cell-safe device design and operation , 2018, Lab on a chip.

[34]  Tuncay Alan,et al.  Vibrating membrane with discontinuities for rapid and efficient microfluidic mixing. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[35]  M. Digman,et al.  Collagen stiffness modulates MDA-MB231 cell metabolism through adhesion-mediated contractility , 2018, bioRxiv.

[36]  David A. Weitz,et al.  Scaling by shrinking: empowering single-cell 'omics' with microfluidic devices , 2017, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[37]  Alexander Rohrbach,et al.  Microfluidic sorting of arbitrary cells with dynamic optical tweezers. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[38]  Helene Andersson,et al.  Microfabrication and microfluidics for tissue engineering: state of the art and future opportunities. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[39]  Robert H. Austin,et al.  Continuous microfluidic immunomagnetic cell separation , 2004 .

[40]  Karen Abrinia,et al.  Surface acoustic waves induced micropatterning of cells in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels , 2017, Biofabrication.

[41]  Peng Li,et al.  Acoustic tweezers for the life sciences , 2018, Nature Methods.

[42]  A. Neild,et al.  Virtual membrane for filtration of particles using surface acoustic waves (SAW). , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[43]  Jin Ho Jung,et al.  Vertical Hydrodynamic Focusing and Continuous Acoustofluidic Separation of Particles via Upward Migration , 2017, Advanced science.

[44]  H M Hertz,et al.  Proliferation and viability of adherent cells manipulated by standing-wave ultrasound in a microfluidic chip. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[45]  Daniel Ahmed,et al.  Rotational manipulation of single cells and organisms using acoustic waves , 2016, Nature Communications.

[46]  D A Weitz,et al.  Surface acoustic wave actuated cell sorting (SAWACS). , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[47]  Dino Di Carlo,et al.  Microtechnology for Cell Manipulation and Sorting. , 2017, Anticancer research.

[48]  K. Dholakia,et al.  Microfluidic sorting in an optical lattice , 2003, Nature.

[49]  Jonathan V. Sweedler,et al.  Single cell analysis , 2006 .

[50]  D. Weitz,et al.  Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[51]  Guillermo A. Gomez,et al.  Mechanically-sensitive miRNAs bias human mesenchymal stem cell fate via mTOR signalling , 2018, Nature Communications.

[52]  Xinlong Wang,et al.  Morphological and Mechanical Properties of Osteosarcoma Microenvironment Cells Explored by Atomic Force Microscopy , 2016, Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry.

[53]  Anas Alazzam,et al.  Continuous separation of particles in a PDMS microfluidic channel via travelling surface acoustic waves (TSAW). , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[54]  Sung Kwon Cho,et al.  Efficient in-droplet separation of magnetic particles for digital microfluidics , 2007 .

[55]  Hans M. Hertz,et al.  A three-dimensional ultrasonic cage for characterization of individual cells , 2008 .

[56]  A. Neild,et al.  Acoustic tweezers via sub–time-of-flight regime surface acoustic waves , 2016, Science Advances.

[57]  John P Wikswo,et al.  Microfluidic platform for real-time signaling analysis of multiple single T cells in parallel. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[58]  D. Di Carlo Inertial microfluidics. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[59]  Lin Wang,et al.  Standing surface acoustic wave (SSAW) based multichannel cell sorting. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[60]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[61]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  Microfluidic devices for studying heterotypic cell-cell interactions and tissue specimen cultures under controlled microenvironments. , 2011, Biomicrofluidics.

[62]  M. Sano,et al.  Selective isolation of live/dead cells using contactless dielectrophoresis (cDEP). , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[63]  Michael Doran,et al.  A novel multishear microdevice for studying cell mechanics. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[64]  N. Perrimon,et al.  Droplet microfluidic technology for single-cell high-throughput screening , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  M. Knight,et al.  Tissue stiffening promotes keratinocyte proliferation through activation of epidermal growth factor signaling , 2018, Journal of Cell Science.

[66]  Peer Fischer,et al.  Holograms for acoustics , 2016, Nature.

[67]  W. Burger,et al.  A Novel Ultrasonic Resonance Field Device for the Retention of Animal Cells , 1994, Biotechnology progress.

[68]  Henrik Bruus,et al.  A numerical study of microparticle acoustophoresis driven by acoustic radiation forces and streaming-induced drag forces. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[69]  D. Beebe,et al.  Biological implications of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic cell culture. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[70]  T. Huang,et al.  Acoustofluidic Synthesis of Particulate Nanomaterials , 2019, Advanced science.

[71]  Martyn Hill,et al.  Application of an acoustofluidic perfusion bioreactor for cartilage tissue engineering , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[72]  David W Inglis,et al.  Critical particle size for fractionation by deterministic lateral displacement. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[73]  A. Neild,et al.  The size dependant behaviour of particles driven by a travelling surface acoustic wave (TSAW). , 2018, Lab on a chip.

[74]  J. McGrath,et al.  Keratin 9 Is Required for the Structural Integrity and Terminal Differentiation of the Palmoplantar Epidermis , 2013, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[75]  V. Velebný,et al.  Modulation of keratin 1, 10 and involucrin expression as part of the complex response of the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT to ultraviolet radiation , 2013, Interdisciplinary toxicology.

[76]  H. Aranda‐Espinoza,et al.  Cholesterol depletion increases membrane stiffness of aortic endothelial cells. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[77]  Tuncay Alan,et al.  Particle separation using virtual deterministic lateral displacement (vDLD). , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[78]  J M Piret,et al.  Batch and Semicontinuous Aggregation and Sedimentation of Hybridoma Cells by Acoustic Resonance Fields , 1995, Biotechnology progress.