Identification of candidate genes involved in neuroblastoma progression by combining genomic and expression microarrays with survival data

Identifying genes, whose expression is consistently altered by chromosomal gains or losses, is an important step in defining genes of biological relevance in a wide variety of tumour types. However, additional criteria are needed to discriminate further among the large number of candidate genes identified. This is particularly true for neuroblastoma, where multiple genomic copy number changes of proven prognostic value exist. We have used Affymetrix microarrays and a combination of fluorescent in situ hybridization and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays to establish expression profiles and delineate copy number alterations in 30 primary neuroblastomas. Correlation of microarray data with patient survival and analysis of expression within rodent neuroblastoma cell lines were then used to define further genes likely to be involved in the disease process. Using this approach, we identify >1000 genes within eight recurrent genomic alterations (loss of 1p, 3p, 4p, 10q and 11q, 2p gain, 17q gain, and the MYCN amplicon) whose expression is consistently altered by copy number change. Of these, 84 correlate with patient survival, with the minimal regions of 17q gain and 4p loss being enriched significantly for such genes. These include genes involved in RNA and DNA metabolism, and apoptosis. Orthologues of all but one of these genes on 17q are overexpressed in rodent neuroblastoma cell lines. A significant excess of SNPs whose copy number correlates with survival is also observed on proximal 4p in stage 4 tumours, and we find that deletion of 4p is associated with improved outcome in an extended cohort of tumours. These results define the major impact of genomic copy number alterations upon transcription within neuroblastoma, and highlight genes on distal 17q and proximal 4p for downstream analyses. They also suggest that integration of discriminators, such as survival and comparative gene expression, with microarray data may be useful in the identification of critical genes within regions of loss or gain in many human cancers.

[1]  Axel Benner,et al.  Reduced Expression of CAMTA1 Correlates with Adverse Outcome in Neuroblastoma Patients , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[2]  Michael Baudis,et al.  Unequivocal delineation of clinicogenetic subgroups and development of a new model for improved outcome prediction in neuroblastoma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  W. Gerald,et al.  Integrative genomics identifies distinct molecular classes of neuroblastoma and shows that multiple genes are targeted by regional alterations in DNA copy number. , 2006, Cancer research.

[4]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[5]  J Pritchard,et al.  Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  T. Strachan,et al.  Breakpoint position on 17q identifies the most aggressive neuroblastoma tumors , 2002, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[7]  William C Reinhold,et al.  Integrating data on DNA copy number with gene expression levels and drug sensitivities in the NCI-60 cell line panel , 2006, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[8]  Gudrun Schleiermacher,et al.  Gene expression profiling of 1p35–36 genes in neuroblastoma , 2004, Oncogene.

[9]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Genome-wide array CGH analysis of murine neuroblastoma reveals distinct genomic aberrations which parallel those in human tumors. , 2003, Cancer research.

[10]  Hiroyuki Shimada,et al.  Chromosome 1p and 11q deletions and outcome in neuroblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  F. Berthold,et al.  Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging and response to treatment. , 1993, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[12]  B. Korf,et al.  myc gene amplification and expression in primary human neuroblastoma. , 1990, Cancer research.

[13]  Nick Bown,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization study of primary neuroblastoma tumors , 1997, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[14]  M. Jackson,et al.  Regions syntenic to human 17q are gained in mouse and rat neuroblastoma , 2004, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[15]  Qing-Rong Chen,et al.  cDNA array-CGH profiling identifies genomic alterations specific to stage and MYCN-amplification in neuroblastoma , 2004, BMC Genomics.

[16]  Rogier Versteeg,et al.  Allelic loss of chromosome 1p as a predictor of unfavorable outcome in patients with neuroblastoma. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Keith W. Jones,et al.  Whole genome DNA copy number changes identified by high density oligonucleotide arrays , 2004, Human Genomics.

[18]  H. Sather,et al.  Association of multiple copies of the N-myc oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastomas. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Antonio Ortega,et al.  Prognostic significance of gene expression profiles of metastatic neuroblastomas lacking MYCN gene amplification. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  G. Ferrara,et al.  Weak linkage at 4p16 to predisposition for human neuroblastoma , 2002, Oncogene.

[21]  A. Craft,et al.  Cytogenetic abnormalities of small round cell tumours. , 1994, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[22]  F. Speleman,et al.  Gain of chromosome arm 17q and adverse outcome in patients with neuroblastoma. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Cheng Li,et al.  Integration of global SNP-based mapping and expression arrays reveals key regions, mechanisms, and genes important in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. , 2006, Blood.

[24]  John M Maris,et al.  High-resolution analysis of chromosomal breakpoints and genomic instability identifies PTPRD as a candidate tumor suppressor gene in neuroblastoma. , 2006, Cancer research.

[25]  P. Ambros,et al.  Pathology and biology guidelines for resectable and unresectable neuroblastic tumors and bone marrow examination guidelines. , 2001, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[26]  K. Aldape,et al.  Integrated array-comparative genomic hybridization and expression array profiles identify clinically relevant molecular subtypes of glioblastoma. , 2005, Cancer research.

[27]  R. Versteeg,et al.  Allelic loss of the short arm of chromosome 4 in neuroblastoma suggests a novel tumour suppressor gene locus , 1996, Human Genetics.

[28]  H. Christiansen,et al.  Coamplification of DDX1 correlates with an improved survival probability in children with MYCN-amplified human neuroblastoma. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  F. Berthold,et al.  Reliable transcript quantification by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in primary neuroblastoma using normalization to averaged expression levels of the control genes HPRT1 and SDHA. , 2005, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[30]  C. Deng,et al.  BRCA1: cell cycle checkpoint, genetic instability, DNA damage response and cancer evolution , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  M. Jackson,et al.  Comprehensive genetic and histopathologic study reveals three types of neuroblastoma tumors. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  F. Speleman,et al.  No evidence for correlation of DDX1 gene amplification with improved survival probability in patients with MYCN-amplified neuroblastomas. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  P. Waber,et al.  N-myc oncogene RNA expression in neuroblastoma. , 1988, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[34]  O. Delattre,et al.  Stepwise occurrence of a complex unbalanced translocation in neuroblastoma leading to insertion of a telomere sequence and late chromosome 17q gain , 2005, Oncogene.

[35]  Shigeru Chiba,et al.  A robust algorithm for copy number detection using high-density oligonucleotide single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping arrays. , 2005, Cancer research.

[36]  T. Richmond,et al.  Analysis of chromosome breakpoints in neuroblastoma at sub‐kilobase resolution using fine‐tiling oligonucleotide array CGH , 2005, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[37]  Eytan Domany,et al.  Relationship of gene expression and chromosomal abnormalities in colorectal cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[38]  High-resolution analysis of gene copy number alterations in human prostate cancer using CGH on cDNA microarrays: impact of copy number on gene expression. , 2004 .

[39]  D. Zimonjic,et al.  Molecular cytogenetic characterization of cancer cell alterations. , 1997, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[40]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Increased WSB1 copy number correlates with its over‐expression which associates with increased survival in neuroblastoma , 2006, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[41]  W. London,et al.  Survivin mRNA Levels Are Associated With Biology of Disease and Patient Survival in Neuroblastoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group , 2006, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[42]  E. Connolly,et al.  Chromosome 1p and 11q Deletions and Outcome in Neuroblastoma. , 2006, Neurosurgery.