Space weathering of solar array coverglasses

The harsh space environment at geosynchronous orbit (GEO) induces differential charging of spacecraft surfaces due to fluxes of high energy electrons onto and through them. Thus, satellite surfaces can charge thousands of volts with respect to each other whereas entire satellites can charge tens of thousands of volts negative of their surrounding space plasma. The ensuing electric fields can cause local discharges (arcs), endangering the normal operation of the satellite. Solar cell coverglass contamination induced by the high rate of arcing is sufficient to produce the ~1.5 percent/ year power loss in excess of radiation damage on the global positioning system (GPS) satellites. This work focuses on evaluation of a GEO space weather effect, caused by 90 keV high-energy electron radiation, on material properties of different types of commonly used in space solar cell coverglasses (CMX, fused silica, and 0214). Charge analysis performed with a GPS Block IIF NASCAP model demonstrated that the use of CMX, a high-conductivity coverglass, may help to mitigate differential charging and prevent arc-induced contamination. Finally, radiofrequency observations by the Arecibo 305 m telescope of GEO satellites with different configurations have registered abundant arcing of satellites utilizing less conductive coverglasses and no arcing on two with CMX coverglasses. It is the object of the current study to see how space weathering of different coverglass types may alter these results.

[1]  K. Artyushkova,et al.  XPS Investigation of the Source of GPS Arc Contamination , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[2]  S. White,et al.  Anomalous Global Positioning System Power Degradation from Arc-Induced Contamination , 2016 .

[4]  Mengu Cho,et al.  Charging and Arcing Test on Semiconductive Coated Solar Coupon Panel , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[5]  G. P. Ginet,et al.  AE9, AP9 and SPM: New Models for Specifying the Trapped Energetic Particle and Space Plasma Environment , 2013 .

[6]  M. J. Berger ESTAR, PSTAR, and ASTAR: Computer programs for calculating stopping-power and range tables for electrons, protons, and helium ions , 1992 .

[7]  A. Bogorad,et al.  Space environmental testing of blue red reflecting coverglasses for gallium arsenide and high efficiency silicon solar cells , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 1st World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion - WCPEC (A Joint Conference of PVSC, PVSEC and PSEC).

[8]  N. V. Yagova,et al.  Statistical relationships between satellite anomalies at geostationary orbit and high-energy particles , 2004 .

[9]  J. R. Dennison,et al.  Methods for High Resistivity Measurements Related to Spacecraft-Charging , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[10]  Jr Dennison,et al.  Measurement of conductivity and charge storage in insulators related to spacecraft charging , 2003, 2003 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena.

[11]  M. Cho,et al.  Electrostatic Discharge Threshold on Coverglass Used to Protect Solar Cells in the Low Earth Orbit , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[12]  Satoshi Hosoda,et al.  Degradation of High-Voltage Solar Array Due to Arcing in Plasma Environment , 2005 .

[13]  T. Okumura,et al.  Flashover Plasma Characteristics on 5m2 Solar Array Panels in a Simulated Plasma Environment of Geostationary Orbit and Low Earth Orbit , 2010 .

[14]  K. Mullaney,et al.  The infra red reflecting coverglass for silicon and GaAs solar cells used in near Earth and geostationary orbits , 1994, IEEE World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference.

[15]  S. Michizono,et al.  Influence of high energy electrons and protons on secondary electron emission of cover glasses for space solar cells , 2002, 20th International Symposium on Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum.

[16]  Dale C. Ferguson,et al.  Remote detection of arcing on geosynchronous satellites , 2020, Defense + Commercial Sensing.