What You See is What You Get: Systematic Variability in Perceptual-Based Social Judgment

The existing literature on attitudes and social perception provides ample confirmation of the impact of physical appearance on social judgment and evaluation outcomes. The present article investigates the extent to which these robust findings are moderated by stable individual differences in the tendency to rely on external stimulus qualities in forming social impressions. Study 1 introduces the Perceptual Reliance Index (PRI) and provides psychometric data on the measure. Study 2 shows that high PRI participants make significantly different social evaluations for targets of high versus low physical attractiveness, whereas low PRI participants do not. Study 3 further extends these findings by demonstrating that within-race variations in phenotypic appearance (e.g., skin color, facial features) produce differential priming effects for high but not low PRI participants. Such systematic bias in social judgment on the basis of physical cues alone suggests the existence of a purely perceptual-based form of prejudice.

[1]  Patrick T. Vargas,et al.  On The Role Of Encoding Processes In Stereotype Maintenance , 1995 .

[2]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information Processing , 1985 .

[3]  T. K. Srull,et al.  A Dual process model of impression formation , 1988 .

[4]  J. Bruner,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF PEOPLE , 1954 .

[5]  Jeffrey W. Sherman,et al.  Automatic and Controlled Components of Prejudice Toward Fat People: Evaluation Versus Stereotype Activation , 2000 .

[6]  Mary Ann Collins,et al.  Accurate Social Perception at Zero Acquaintance: The Affordances of a Gibsonian Approach , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[7]  Alan Feingold,et al.  Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. , 1990 .

[8]  D. Berry,et al.  Some components and consequences of a babyface. , 1985 .

[9]  W. Bevan,et al.  The Negro stereotype and perceptual accentuation. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[10]  S. Lemon,et al.  The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism , 2001 .

[11]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[12]  D. Funder On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. , 1995, Psychological review.

[13]  R. Baron,et al.  Toward an Ecological Theory of Social Perception , 1983 .

[14]  C. Crandall,et al.  Culture, Ideology, and Antifat Attitudes , 1996 .

[15]  J. Lang Infants ' Differential Social Responses to Attractive and Unattractive Faces , 1990 .

[16]  L. Zebrowitz,et al.  The Contribution of Typical Sex Differences in Facial Maturity to Sex Role Stereotypes , 1992 .

[17]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Implicit Theories Individual Differences in the Likelihood and Meaning of Dispositional Inference , 1993 .

[18]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe , 1995 .

[19]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consensus in interpersonal perception: acquaintance and the big five. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  A. Franklin The Color Complex: The Politics of Skin Color Among African Americans. , 1993 .

[21]  C. Judd,et al.  Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nature of Priming Effects on Categorization , 1985 .

[23]  M. Snyder Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[24]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. , 1995 .

[25]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[26]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[27]  N. Ambady,et al.  Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[28]  E. Walster,et al.  Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[30]  C. Crandall Prejudice against fat people: ideology and self-interest. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. , 1978 .

[32]  M. Brewer,et al.  Perceptions of the Elderly: Stereotypes as Prototypes , 1981 .

[33]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[34]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[35]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. , 1995 .

[37]  T. Adorno The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[38]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? , 1997 .

[39]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[40]  J. B. Mcconahay,et al.  Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. , 1986 .

[41]  R. Brown,et al.  Neosexism: Plus Ça Change, Plus C'est Pareil , 1995 .

[42]  J Tudor-Hart,et al.  On the nature of prejudice. , 1961, The Eugenics review.

[43]  P. Devine Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[44]  A. Dabbs The social psychology of facial appearance , 1989 .

[45]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Orientations Toward Personnel Selection: Differential Reliance on Appearance and Personality , 1988 .

[46]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[47]  M. Brewer,et al.  The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories , 1989 .

[48]  B. Gillen,et al.  Physical Attractiveness , 1981 .

[49]  V. Yzerbyt,et al.  Social Judgeability - the Impact of Meta-informational Cues On the Use of Stereotypes , 1994 .