Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer: initial clinical experience with real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance and magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion.

OBJECTIVE To prove the feasibility and evaluate the initial clinical results of targeted prostate biopsies using the Urostation novel platform using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) registration to help steer the biopsy needle to suspicious areas. METHODS We prospectively included 30 patients for suspicion of prostate cancer from November 2011 to August 2012. All patients were previously evaluated by a multiparametric MRI, interpreted by a single radiologist who attributed a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score to each lesion. A conventional 12-core randomized biopsy protocol was performed and 2 additional targeted biopsies were performed on suspicious area(s). The results of randomized and targeted biopsies were compared. RESULTS Among the 30 patients, suspicious area(s) were found on MRI in 20 cases (67%). Median procedure time was 23 minutes. Targeting success rate (biopsy visualized inside the target) was 83%, with at least 1 biopsy reaching the target in all cases. Prostate cancer was detected in 14 cases (47%), including 11 cases with an abnormal MRI. Targeted biopsies detected cancer in all 11 cases and all but 1 were clinically significant. Randomized biopsies detected 10 of these 11 cases, and 3 more cases that MRI considered normal. Sensitivity to detect a significant cancer was 91% in both modalities. CONCLUSION This initial clinical study showed encouraging results for targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsies using MRI-TRUS fusion. Although further studies are needed to determine the role of prostate MRI before biopsy and the relevance of targeted biopsies, the Urostation is an MRI-TRUS fusion device that has good accuracy for targeting suspicious areas on MRI.

[1]  P. Mozer,et al.  Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients. , 2012, European urology.

[2]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[3]  D. Beyersdorff,et al.  MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. , 2005, Radiology.

[4]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Patient selection determines the prostate cancer yield of dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging‐guided transrectal biopsies in a closed 3‐Tesla scanner , 2007, BJU international.

[5]  Alan W Partin,et al.  Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors , 2004, Cancer.

[6]  Pingkun Yan,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[7]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  Combined multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsies improve anterior prostate cancer detection, staging, and grading. , 2011, Urology.

[8]  J. Patard,et al.  Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy. , 2009, European urology.

[9]  Tom W J Scheenen,et al.  Feasibility of a pneumatically actuated MR-compatible robot for transrectal prostate biopsy guidance. , 2011, Radiology.

[10]  Monish Aron,et al.  3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  Mapping of Transrectal Ultrasonographic Prostate Biopsies , 2009, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[12]  S. Zangos,et al.  MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results , 2004, European Radiology.

[13]  P. Walsh,et al.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. , 1994, JAMA.

[14]  Tsuyoshi Mitake,et al.  Real‐time Virtual Sonography for navigation during targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging data , 2010, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[15]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  MRI/TRUS data fusion for prostate brachytherapy. Preliminary results , 2004, Medical physics.

[16]  Yipeng Hu,et al.  Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[17]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2009, Urology.

[18]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[19]  J. Fütterer,et al.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 , 2012, European Radiology.

[20]  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer,et al.  MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. , 2006, European urology.

[21]  Thomas Wiegel,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. , 2011, European urology.

[22]  B. Kiefer,et al.  Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device , 2006, European Radiology.

[23]  Mark Emberton,et al.  Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. , 2013, European urology.

[24]  O. Bratt Re: Jean-Louis Campos-Fernandes, Laurence Bastien, Nathalie Nicolaiew, et al. Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy. Eur Urol 2009;55:600-9. , 2009, European urology.

[25]  Nikolai Hungr,et al.  Development of a Novel Robot for Transperineal Needle Based Interventions: Focal Therapy, Brachytherapy and Prostate Biopsies , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[26]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. , 2012, European urology.

[27]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. , 2011, Urologic oncology.

[28]  Nikolai Hungr,et al.  A 3-D Ultrasound Robotic Prostate Brachytherapy System With Prostate Motion Tracking , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[29]  Georgios Sakas,et al.  A novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating pre-interventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasound fusion. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[30]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  M Bolla,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. , 2001, European urology.

[32]  B. Carey,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. , 2011, European urology.