Fast Equilibration of Water between Buried Sites and the Bulk by Molecular Dynamics with Parallel Monte Carlo Water Moves on Graphical Processing Units.

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of proteins are commonly used to sample from the Boltzmann distribution of conformational states, with wide-ranging applications spanning chemistry, biophysics, and drug discovery. However, MD can be inefficient at equilibrating water occupancy for buried cavities in proteins that are inaccessible to the surrounding solvent. Indeed, the time needed for water molecules to equilibrate between the bulk solvent and the binding site can be well beyond what is practical with standard MD, which typically ranges from hundreds of nanoseconds to a few microseconds. We recently introduced a hybrid Monte Carlo/MD (MC/MD) method, which speeds up the equilibration of water between buried cavities and the surrounding solvent, while sampling from the thermodynamically correct distribution of states. While the initial implementation of the MC functionality led to considerable slowing of the overall simulations, here we address this problem with a parallel MC algorithm implemented on graphical processing units. This results in speed-ups of 10-fold to 1000-fold over the original MC/MD algorithm, depending on the system and simulation parameters. The present method is available for use in the AMBER simulation software.

[1]  E. Gallicchio,et al.  Alchemical Transfer Approach to Absolute Binding Free Energy Estimation. , 2021, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[2]  M. Gilson,et al.  Automation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy calculations for docking refinement and compound evaluation , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Jonathan W. Essex,et al.  grand: A Python Module for Grand Canonical Water Sampling in OpenMM , 2020, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  M. Gilson,et al.  Accounting for the Central Role of Interfacial Water in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations. , 2020, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[5]  Gregory A Ross,et al.  Enhancing water sampling in free energy calculations with grand canonical Monte Carlo. , 2020, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[6]  Teresa Danielle Bergazin,et al.  Enhancing water sampling of buried binding sites using nonequilibrium candidate Monte Carlo , 2020, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[7]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Rigorous Free Energy Simulations in Virtual Screening , 2020, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[8]  M. Gilson,et al.  Simulating Water Exchange to Buried Binding Sites. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[9]  Gregory A Ross,et al.  Ligand Binding Free Energies with Adaptive Water Networks: Two-Dimensional Grand Canonical Alchemical Perturbations , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[10]  Ross C. Walker,et al.  Fast and Flexible GPU Accelerated Binding Free Energy Calculations within the AMBER Molecular Dynamics Package , 2018, bioRxiv.

[11]  Gregory A Ross,et al.  Replica-Exchange and Standard State Binding Free Energies with Grand Canonical Monte Carlo , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[12]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  OpenMM 7: Rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics , 2016, bioRxiv.

[13]  David L. Mobley,et al.  Predicting binding free energies: Frontiers and benchmarks , 2016, bioRxiv.

[14]  Michael K. Gilson,et al.  Solvation thermodynamic mapping of molecular surfaces in AmberTools: GIST , 2016, J. Comput. Chem..

[15]  Gregory A Ross,et al.  Water Sites, Networks, And Free Energies with Grand Canonical Monte Carlo. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  C. Simmerling,et al.  ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[17]  Duncan Poole,et al.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit Solvent Particle Mesh Ewald. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[18]  Andreas W. Götz,et al.  SPFP: Speed without compromise - A mixed precision model for GPU accelerated molecular dynamics simulations , 2013, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[19]  Michael K Gilson,et al.  Grid inhomogeneous solvation theory: hydration structure and thermodynamics of the miniature receptor cucurbit[7]uril. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[20]  Duncan Poole,et al.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized Born , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[21]  Berend Smit,et al.  Molecular Monte Carlo Simulations Using Graphics Processing Units: To Waste Recycle or Not? , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[22]  B. Kuhn,et al.  A Medicinal Chemist’s Guide to Molecular Interactions , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[23]  David L Mobley,et al.  Predicting ligand binding affinity with alchemical free energy methods in a polar model binding site. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  D. Case,et al.  Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Computation of binding free energy with molecular dynamics and grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[26]  David L Mobley,et al.  Accurate and efficient corrections for missing dispersion interactions in molecular simulations. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[27]  Julien Michel,et al.  Protein-Ligand Complexes:  Computation of the Relative Free Energy of Different Scaffolds and Binding Modes. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[28]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[29]  Charles A Laughton,et al.  Strong solute-solute dispersive interactions in a protein-ligand complex. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  D. Frenkel Speed-up of Monte Carlo simulations by sampling of rejected states. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations of water in protein environments. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[32]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[33]  J. Åqvist,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Water and Biomolecules with a Monte Carlo Constant Pressure Algorithm , 2004 .

[34]  Stefan Boresch,et al.  Absolute Binding Free Energies: A Quantitative Approach for Their Calculation , 2003 .

[35]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[36]  P. Kollman,et al.  Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models , 1992 .

[37]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Efficient computation of absolute free energies of binding by computer simulations. Application to the methane dimer in water , 1988 .

[38]  Mihaly Mezei,et al.  Grand-canonical ensemble Monte Carlo study of dense liquid Lennard-Jones, soft spheres and water , 1987 .

[39]  P. A. Bash,et al.  Calculation of the relative change in binding free energy of a protein-inhibitor complex. , 1987, Science.

[40]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[41]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[42]  P. Biggin,et al.  Absolute Alchemical Free Energy Calculations for Ligand Binding: A Beginner's Guide. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[43]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Ligand-receptor interactions , 1984, Comput. Chem..