Use of imaging biomarkers for regulatory studies.

Imaging often plays an important role in pivotal clinical trials of drugs or devices that have been submitted for approval to regulatory agencies that grant approval for the marketing and sale of these products on the basis of documentation of their safety and efficacy. Imaging biomarkers can help substantiate either or both of these characteristics. This article focuses on how to successfully incorporate imaging biomarkers into clinical trials through a process of careful planning and diligent execution. Planning starts with posing and then answering a number of questions that pertain to the product under study. What will the claimed benefit of the product be? Is there a current standard of care that involves imaging, and will that standard of care help in the documentation of safety and efficacy? Are there relevant novel imaging biomarkers? Are there any relevant guidance documents issued by the regulatory agencies? After imaging biomarkers are identified, their role and benefit must be understood. Will they help diagnose subjects? Will they stratify subjects for enrollment? Will they identify those who are more likely to benefit? Will they help document progression of disease and effectiveness of intervention? Execution must occur in close collaboration with regulatory agencies and with the involvement of imaging experts and imaging core laboratories to ensure attention to key components: imaging charter, investigator training and certification, 21 CFR Part 11 (Part 11 of Title 21 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations)-compliant data management, real-time incoming image quality control for eligibility reads and investigator feedback, and centralized image analysis for safety and efficacy by certified readers.

[1]  I. Arostegui,et al.  Prevalence of knee and hip osteoarthritis and the appropriateness of joint replacement in an older population. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  M. Nevitt,et al.  Longitudinal performance evaluation and validation of fixed-flexion radiography of the knee for detection of joint space loss. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  E. Vignon,et al.  Radiographic issues in imaging the progression of hip and knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[4]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  A pilot, two-year longitudinal study of the interrelationship between trabecular bone and articular cartilage in the osteoarthritic knee. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[5]  Amy L Lerner,et al.  Predicting regional variations in trabecular bone mechanical properties within the human proximal tibia using MR imaging. , 2008, Bone.

[6]  H K Genant,et al.  Trainable rule-based algorithm for the measurement of joint space width in digital radiographic images of the knee. , 2000, Medical physics.

[7]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of normal and osteoarthritic trabecular bone structure in the human knee. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  J. Reginster,et al.  Longitudinal study of magnetic resonance imaging and standard X-rays to assess disease progression in osteoarthritis. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[9]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  A Guermazi,et al.  The association of meniscal pathologic changes with cartilage loss in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  Xiaojuan Li,et al.  Relationship between trabecular bone structure and articular cartilage morphology and relaxation times in early OA of the knee joint using parallel MRI at 3 T. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[12]  Gheorghe Luta,et al.  Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  M. Nevitt,et al.  Assessment of the radioanatomic positioning of the osteoarthritic knee in serial radiographs: comparison of three acquisition techniques. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[14]  H. Genant,et al.  Responsiveness, effect size, and smallest detectable difference of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in knee osteoarthritis. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  C. Peterfy,et al.  Reproducibility of the semiflexed (metatarsophalangeal) radiographic knee position and automated measurements of medial tibiofemoral joint space width in a multicenter clinical trial of knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, The Journal of rheumatology.

[16]  C. Peterfy,et al.  Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee provides reproducible joint space width measurements in osteoarthritis , 2004, European Radiology.

[17]  F Eckstein,et al.  MRI protocols for whole-organ assessment of the knee in osteoarthritis. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[18]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Toward imaging biomarkers for osteoarthritis. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  C. Peterfy,et al.  Bone marrow abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging are associated with type II collagen degradation in knee osteoarthritis: a three-month longitudinal study. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  E. Vignon,et al.  Influence of the quality of tibial plateau alignment on the reproducibility of computer joint space measurement from Lyon schuss radiographic views of the knee in patients with knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[21]  Deborah Burstein,et al.  MRI for development of disease‐modifying osteoarthritis drugs , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[22]  L. Sharma,et al.  Full-limb and knee radiography assessments of varus-valgus alignment and their relationship to osteoarthritis disease features by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[23]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[24]  Janet Woodcock,et al.  The FDA critical path initiative and its influence on new drug development. , 2008, Annual review of medicine.

[25]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[26]  Wei Li,et al.  Bone Marrow Edema and Its Relation to Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[27]  E. Vignon,et al.  Which is the best radiographic protocol for a clinical trial of a structure modifying drug in patients with knee osteoarthritis? , 2002, The Journal of rheumatology.

[28]  D J Hunter,et al.  Classification of osteoarthritis biomarkers: a proposed approach. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[29]  E. Vignon,et al.  Selection of knee radiographs for trials of structure-modifying drugs in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, longitudinal study of Lyon Schuss knee radiographs with the definition of adequate alignment of the medial tibial plateau. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[30]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Magnetic resonance evaluation of the interrelationship between articular cartilage and trabecular bone of the osteoarthritic knee. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[31]  A. Guermazi,et al.  The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston–Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score) , 2007, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[32]  Janet Woodcock,et al.  FDA's Critical Path Initiative. , 2007, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[33]  D. Burstein,et al.  Is MRI fulfilling its promise for molecular imaging of cartilage in arthritis? , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[34]  Jean-Pierre Devogelaer,et al.  Recommendations for the use of new methods to assess the efficacy of disease-modifying drugs in the treatment of osteoarthritis. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[35]  E. Vignon,et al.  Advances in radiographic imaging of progression of hip and knee osteoarthritis. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[36]  F Eckstein,et al.  Two year longitudinal change and test-retest-precision of knee cartilage morphology in a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[37]  J. Lynch,et al.  Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test-retest reproducibility , 2003, Skeletal Radiology.