Platelet Inhibition With Cangrelor and Crushed Ticagrelor in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of the CANTIC Study

Background: The platelet inhibitory effects induced by oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists are delayed in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI). In turn, this leads to a gap in platelet inhibition, exposing patients to an increased risk of early thrombotic complications and underscoring the need to define strategies associated with more effective platelet inhibition in the peri–primary percutaneous coronary intervention period. Cangrelor is an intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor with prompt and potent antiplatelet effects. However, to date, there are limited data on the effects of cangrelor used in combination with ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Moreover, questions have emerged on the potential for drug–drug interactions during the transition from cangrelor to oral P2Y12 inhibitors. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pharmacodynamic study conducted in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n=50) who were randomized to treatment with either cangrelor or matching placebo (bolus followed by 2-hour infusion). All patients received ticagrelor 180-mg loading dose administered as crushed tablets at the time of cangrelor/placebo bolus administration. Pharmacodynamic analyses were performed at 8 time points. Pharmacodynamic effects were measured as P2Y12 reaction units by VerifyNow and platelet reactivity index by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein. Results: Compared with placebo, cangrelor was associated with reduced P2Y12 reaction units as early as 5 minutes after bolus, which persisted during the entire duration of drug infusion, including at 30 minutes (63 [32–93] versus 214 [183–245]; mean difference, 152 [95% CI, 108–195]; P<0·001; primary end point). Parallel findings were shown with platelet reactivity index. Accordingly, high on-treatment platelet reactivity rates were reduced with cangrelor. After discontinuation of cangrelor/placebo infusion, there were no differences in levels of platelet reactivity between groups, ruling out a drug–drug interaction when cangrelor and ticagrelor are concomitantly administered. Conclusions: In patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, cangrelor is an effective strategy to bridge the gap in platelet inhibition associated with the use of oral P2Y12 inhibition induced by ticagrelor. Ticagrelor can be administered as a crushed formulation concomitantly with cangrelor without any apparent drug–drug interaction. The clinical implications of these pharmacodynamic findings warrant investigation in an adequately powered clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03247738

[1]  G. Levine,et al.  ACC/AHA Versus ESC Guidelines on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: JACC Guideline Comparison. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  E. Iliodromitis,et al.  Cangrelor in Ticagrelor-Loaded STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  P. Coste,et al.  Optimal platelet inhibition with cangrelor in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2018, Resuscitation.

[4]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Acquired Thrombocytopenia After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Pooled, Patient-Level Analysis of the CHAMPION Trials (Cangrelor Versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition) , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  International Expert Consensus on Switching Platelet P2Y12 Receptor–Inhibiting Therapies , 2017, Circulation.

[6]  W. Herzog,et al.  Effect of Intravenous Fentanyl on Ticagrelor Absorption and Platelet Inhibition Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The PACIFY Randomized Clinical Trial (Platelet Aggregation With Ticagrelor Inhibition and Fentanyl). , 2017, Circulation.

[7]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Safety and Tolerability of Transitioning from Cangrelor to Ticagrelor in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2017, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Cangrelor Use in Cardiogenic Shock: A Single-Center Real-World Experience. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  S. James,et al.  Cangrelor in combination with ticagrelor provides consistent and potent P2Y12-inhibition during and after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in real-world patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction , 2017, Platelets.

[10]  D. Angiolillo,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy for patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI , 2017, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[11]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Evaluation of Ischemic and Bleeding Risks Associated With 2 Parenteral Antiplatelet Strategies Comparing Cangrelor With Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors: An Exploratory Analysis From the CHAMPION Trials , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[12]  F. Neumann,et al.  Randomized Comparison of Oral P2Y12-Receptor Inhibitor Loading Strategies for Transitioning From Cangrelor: The ExcelsiorLOAD2 Trial. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[13]  C. Investigators Cangrelor with and without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention , 2017 .

[14]  D. Angiolillo,et al.  Crushed Prasugrel Tablets in Patients With STEMI Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The CRUSH Study. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  L. Been,et al.  In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Effects of Cangrelor on Platelet P2Y12 Receptor-Mediated Signaling in Ticagrelor-Treated Patients. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  D. Angiolillo,et al.  Impact of Escalating Loading Dose Regimens of Ticagrelor in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of a Prospective Randomized Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Investigation. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[17]  G. Montalescot,et al.  P2Y12 receptor inhibition and effect of morphine in patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction , 2015, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[18]  R. Abbate,et al.  Ticagrelor crushed tablets administration in STEMI patients: the MOJITO study. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  D. Schneider,et al.  Pharmacodynamic effects during the transition between cangrelor and ticagrelor. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[20]  I. Xanthopoulou,et al.  Onset of Antiplatelet Action With High (100 mg) Versus Standard (60 mg) Loading Dose of Prasugrel in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Pharmacodynamic Study , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[21]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Effect of cangrelor on periprocedural outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions: a pooled analysis of patient-level data , 2013, The Lancet.

[23]  D. Angiolillo,et al.  Cangrelor: a review on pharmacology and clinical trial development , 2013, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.

[24]  D. Angiolillo,et al.  Update on platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: recommendations for clinical practice , 2013, Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease.

[25]  R. Abbate,et al.  Comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor loading doses in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: RAPID (Rapid Activity of Platelet Inhibitor Drugs) primary PCI study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  I. Xanthopoulou,et al.  Randomized Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel Antiplatelet Effects in Patients with ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[28]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Pharmacodynamic effects of cangrelor and clopidogrel: the platelet function substudy from the cangrelor versus standard therapy to achieve optimal management of platelet inhibition (CHAMPION) trials , 2012, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[29]  R. Ferrari,et al.  Prasugrel versus tirofiban bolus with or without short post-bolus infusion with or without concomitant prasugrel administration in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing coronary stenting: the FABOLUS PRO (Facilitation through Aggrastat By drOpping or shortening Infusion Line in patients wit , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[30]  P. Barragan,et al.  Comparison of a new ELISA assay with the flow cytometric assay for platelet vasodilator-associated stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation in whole blood to assess P2Y12 inhibition , 2011, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[31]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Cangrelor With and Without Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  D. Angiolillo,et al.  Switching P2Y12-receptor inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease , 2016, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[33]  D. Angiolillo,et al.  Novel antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndrome , 2015, Nature Reviews Cardiology.