Cyclable City: A Territorial Assessment Procedure for Disruptive Policy-Making on Urban Mobility

Urban cycling is one of the main references for the development of sustainable mobility models [1]. Cycling is an active transport mode that is alternative to the use of public and private means of travel. At city scale it collects high levels of users satisfaction. Urban policies encouraging this transport mode are compared with modal split solutions that must take into account the morphological characteristics of the context as well as the organizational dimensions of urban transport. In this work, after highlighting good practices related to traffic moderation, the promotion of soft active mobility (Living street) and the widespread cycling in the urban context, we propose an intervention scenario for the development of an urban cycling infrastructure scheme that integrates current transport infrastructures (mechanized pedestrian mobility) according to a multimodal approach. The sample context is the city of Potenza (Basilicata - Italy). The focus on slow mobility is part of urban mobility strategies. The contribution described in this paper aims at the integration of mechanized pedestrian mobility and local public transport, by road and rail, with active cycle mobility. The aim is to demonstrate how the proposed scheme is feasible with respect to the steepness and integrates infrastructural solutions and reorganization of driveway mobility for widespread use of the bicycle (both traditional and the most innovative forms e-bike and pedelec).

[1]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  Getting smart about urban mobility – Aligning the paradigms of smart and sustainable , 2016, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[2]  Michael Duncan,et al.  Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[3]  Francesco Scorza,et al.  A Renewed Rational Approach from Liquid Society Towards Anti-fragile Planning , 2017, ICCSA.

[4]  Y. Wong,et al.  Influences of urban characteristics on cycling: Experiences of four cities , 2014 .

[5]  J Hatfield,et al.  An exposure based study of crash and injury rates in a cohort of transport and recreational cyclists in New South Wales, Australia. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  C. Boissonnet,et al.  Dyslipidemia in seven Latin American cities: CARMELA study. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[7]  Beniamino Murgante,et al.  Innovation, technologies, participation: new paradigms towards a 2.0 citizenship , 2019, International Journal of Electronic Governance.

[8]  Beniamino Murgante,et al.  Involving Citizens in the Reuse and Regeneration of Urban Peripheral Spaces , 2017 .

[9]  Beniamino Murgante,et al.  Assessing Urban Fragmentation at Regional Scale Using Sprinkling Indexes , 2018, Sustainability.

[10]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[11]  Debra Lam,et al.  Sustainable Urban Mobility , 2012 .

[12]  Luca Staricco Smart Mobility: opportunità e condizioni , 2013 .

[13]  B. Hofmeister,et al.  Berlin: The Spatial Structure of a Divided City , 1988 .

[14]  David Banister,et al.  The sustainable mobility paradigm , 2008 .

[15]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[16]  Francesco Scorza,et al.  Sustainable Urban Regeneration Policy Making: Inclusive Participation Practice , 2016, ICCSA.

[17]  Francesco Scorza,et al.  Citizen Participation and Technologies: The C.A.S.T. Architecture , 2015, ICCSA.

[18]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[19]  Michelle DeRobertis,et al.  The safety of urban cycle tracks: a review of the literature. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Francesco Pinna,et al.  Urban Policies and Mobility Trends in Italian Smart Cities , 2017 .

[21]  G. Lyons,et al.  Guidance for transport planning and policymaking in the face of an uncertain future , 2016 .

[22]  Francesco Scorza,et al.  Using Open Data and Open Tools in Defining Strategies for the Enhancement of Basilicata Region , 2018, ICCSA.

[23]  I Van Schagen TRAFFIC CALMING SCHEMES: OPPORTUNITIES AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES , 2003 .

[24]  Erick Guerra,et al.  Where do bike lanes work best? A Bayesian spatial model of bicycle lanes and bicycle crashes. , 2017, Safety science.

[25]  Kelly J. Clifton,et al.  Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel , 2001 .

[26]  Carey Curtis,et al.  Planning for sustainable accessibility: The implementation challenge , 2008 .

[27]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Relative influences of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[28]  R. Andersson,et al.  PW 1702 Swedisch vision zero policies for safety – a comparative policy content analysis , 2018, Abstracts.

[29]  Francesco Scorza,et al.  Sustainable Planning: A Methodological Toolkit , 2016, ICCSA.

[30]  Luc Int Panis,et al.  Predicting cycling accident risk in Brussels: a spatial case-control approach. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  R. Dameri,et al.  Smart Mobility in Smart City , 2016 .

[32]  Beniamino Murgante,et al.  Regional Local Development Strategies Benefiting from Open Data and Open Tools and an Outlook on the Renewable Energy Sources Contribution , 2016 .

[33]  Farzana Rahman,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DESIGN AND PLANNING PROCESS OF TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES , 2005 .

[34]  Meghan Winters,et al.  Comparing the effects of infrastructure on bicycling injury at intersections and non-intersections using a case–crossover design , 2013, Injury Prevention.

[35]  Csaba Koren,et al.  Getting an Insight into the Effects of Traffic Calming Measures on Road Safety , 2016 .

[36]  Felipe E Pedroso,et al.  Bicycle Use and Cyclist Safety Following Boston's Bicycle Infrastructure Expansion, 2009-2012. , 2016, American journal of public health.