Artefacts as Mediators of Distributed Social Cognition : A Case Study

Traditionally, cognition has been regarded as the outcome of internal cognitive processes manipulating mental representations. More recently, however, it has become clear that cognition cannot be separated from the social and material environment in which people live and act, and that in many cases cognition is distributed among individuals and environmental properties. One important aspect has turned out to be artefacts and their use, and there is growing interest in understanding how tool use affects cognition. However, even with this increased awareness of the role of artefacts, the focus has mainly been on the cognitive processes and representations of individuals, while the social role of artefacts has received less attention. An ethnographically inspired field study, observing a hospital’s children admission unit, was conducted to investigate the way individual and collaborative work are affected by the use of artefacts within a given social context. The results indicate that the use of artefacts is closely coupled to the social environment, that to some degree social interactions are transformed into more indirect, individual processes, and that artefacts are crucial for high-level processes such as memory and coordination.

[1]  Andy Clark,et al.  Where brain, body, and world collide , 1998, Cognitive Systems Research.

[2]  J. Wertsch The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .

[3]  T. Ingold,et al.  Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution , 1993 .

[4]  A. Clark,et al.  The Extended Mind , 1998, Analysis.

[5]  K. DeWalt,et al.  Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers , 2001 .

[6]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognitive artifacts , 1991 .

[7]  L. Resnick,et al.  Social foundations of cognition. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  A. Clark Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[9]  Beth Preston,et al.  Cognition and Tool Use , 1998 .

[10]  David Kirsh,et al.  Adapting the Environment Instead of Oneself , 2022 .

[11]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  David Kirsh,et al.  The Intelligent Use of Space , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[13]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[14]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[15]  A. Clark,et al.  Books , 2004, INTR.

[16]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on situated and embodied cognition , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[17]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[18]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[19]  Charles Wallis,et al.  Computation and cognition , 2003, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[20]  H. H. Clark Pointing and placing. , 2003 .

[21]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  J. Lave Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[23]  Akiko Saito,et al.  Social Origins of Cognition: Bartlett, Evolutionary Perspective and Embodied Mind Approach , 1996 .

[24]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[25]  Lauren B. Resnick,et al.  Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[26]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[27]  Booncharoen Sirinaovakul,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue , 2002, Comput. Intell..

[28]  John M. Levine,et al.  Culture and socialization in work groups , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[29]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[30]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  Interfaces of social psychology with situated and embodied cognition , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[31]  M. Cole,et al.  A handbook of contemporary Soviet psychology , 1969 .

[32]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[33]  R. Rieber,et al.  The Instrumental Method in Psychology , 1997 .

[34]  Roxana Robinson Blind Man , 2004, Daedalus.

[35]  H. Hendriks-Jansen Catching Ourselves in the Act: Situated Activity, Interactive Emergence, Evolution, and Human Thought , 1996 .

[36]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Beyond the Bounds of Cognition , 2003 .

[37]  Mary Gauvain,et al.  Cultural Tools, Social Interaction and the Development of Thinking , 2001, Human Development.

[38]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reaching with a tool extends visual–tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  I. Walker,et al.  Social Cognition: An Integrated Introduction , 1996 .

[40]  S. Kita Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet , 2003 .

[41]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[42]  G. Bateson Steps to an Ecology of Mind , 1972 .

[43]  E. Miller Handbook of Social Psychology , 1946, Mental Health.

[44]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  A. Maravita,et al.  Tools for the body (schema) , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Where a blind man ends: five comments on context, artifacts and the boundaries of the mind , 2000 .