Network transparency and the performance of dynamic business networks

Business networks have proliferated over the past three decades as many firms enabled by ICT have embraced the digital ecosystem form of organization. This implies that in addition to thinking of performance at the level of the individual firm, it becomes necessary to think in terms of performance at the level of the ecosystem, i.e. the business network as a whole, yet is not clear how to best conceptualize and measure business network performance. In this article, we show that business network performance can be conceptualized in three complementary perspectives: the firm perspective, the complex systems perspective and the customer perspective. We employ the customer perspective and develop two specific business network performance metrics, namely network effectiveness and network efficiency. Based on the information integration and visibility benefits that interorganizational systems (IOS) provide, we then develop a construct called network transparency. Using a series of network experiments with students, we find that an increase in network transparency increases business network performance in terms of network effectiveness and network efficiency. We thus show that the value of network transparency is measurable through clear metrics at the level of the business network as a whole.

[1]  Jussi T. S. Heikkilä,et al.  TEACHING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT TO BUSINESS EXECUTIVES , 2000 .

[2]  M. Fisher,et al.  CONFIGURING A SUPPLY CHAIN TO REDUCE THE COST OF DEMAND UNCERTAINTY , 1997 .

[3]  Michael Barnett The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2006 .

[4]  B. Loasby The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[5]  K. Provan,et al.  A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems , 1995 .

[6]  Otto Koppius,et al.  The Quick-Connect Capability and Its Antecedents , 2009 .

[7]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Scale-free networks , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[8]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres Group versus group: How alliance networks compete , 1994 .

[9]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  A framework for supply chain performance measurement , 2004 .

[10]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring Firm Performance at the Network Level: A Nomology of the Business Impact of Digital Supply Networks , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Demand chain management in manufacturing and services: web-based integration, drivers and performance , 2002 .

[12]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[13]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  INFORMATION REGIMES, INFORMATION STRATEGIES AND THE EVOLUTION OF INTERFIRM NETWORK TOPOLOGIES , 2003 .

[14]  Maureen O'Hara,et al.  Can transparent markets survive , 2000 .

[15]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Networks within networks: Service link overlap, organizational cliques, and network effectiveness , 1998 .

[16]  Otto Koppius,et al.  Network horizon: An information-based view on the dynamics of bridging positions , 2008 .

[17]  Jussi T. S. Heikkilä,et al.  From supply to demand chain management: efficiency and customer satisfaction , 2002 .

[18]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Asymmetric disassembly and robustness in declining networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[20]  K. Provan,et al.  Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks , 2007 .

[21]  Eric van Heck,et al.  Smart business networks: how the network wins , 2007, CACM.

[22]  Alexandre Beaudet,et al.  The Toyota Group and the Aisin Fire , 1998 .

[23]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Sophistication of interfirm network strategies in the Canadian investment banking industry , 2004 .

[24]  Thorsten Posselt The alliance revolution — The new shape of business rivalry , 1998 .

[25]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  The dynamics of network strategies and positions , 2008 .

[26]  Andrew C. Boynton,et al.  Information Architecture: In Search of Efficient Flexibility , 1991, MIS Q..

[27]  J. Brown,et al.  The Only Sustainable Edge: Why Business Strategy Depends On Productive Friction And Dynamic Specialization , 2005 .

[28]  Bruce R. Barringer,et al.  Walking a Tightrope: Creating Value Through Interorganizational Relationships , 2000 .

[29]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  R. Shapiro,et al.  From supply chain to demand chain: the role of lead time reduction in improving demand chain performance , 2004 .

[31]  D. Hartfiel,et al.  Understanding , 2003 .

[32]  A. Oke,et al.  Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: A resource-based theory perspective , 2007 .

[33]  M. Christopher,et al.  Understanding, Implementing and Exploiting Agility and Leanness , 2002 .