Cost-effectiveness of computerized tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening

Background: Computerized tomographic (CT) colonography is a potential alternative to colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Its main advantage, a better safety profile, may be offset by its limitations: lower sensitivity, need for colonoscopy in cases where results are positive, and expense. Methods: We performed an economic evaluation, using decision analysis, to compare CT colonography with colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening in patients over 50 years of age. Three-year outcomes included number of colonoscopies, perforations and adenomas removed; deaths from perforation and from colorectal cancer from missed adenomas; and direct health care costs. The expected prevalence of adenomas, test performance characteristics of CT colonography and colonoscopy, and probability of colonoscopy complications and cancer from missed adenomas were derived from the literature. Costs were determined in detail locally. Results: Using the base-case assumptions, a strategy of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening would cost $2.27 million extra per 100 000 patients screened; 3.78 perforation-related deaths would be avoided, but 4.11 extra deaths would occur from missed adenomas. Because screening with CT colonography would cost more and result in more deaths overall compared with colonoscopy, the latter remained the dominant strategy. Our results were sensitive to CT colonography's test performance characteristics, the malignant risk of missed adenomas, the risk of perforation and related death, the procedural costs and differences in screening adherence. Interpretation: At present, CT colonography cannot be recommended as a primary means of population-based colorectal cancer screening in Canada.

[1]  J. Waye,et al.  Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications. , 1992, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[2]  K. Mergener,et al.  Complications of Endoscopy , 1998, Endoscopy.

[3]  T. Eisenbach,et al.  Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  J. Yee,et al.  Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening: a comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[5]  S. Woolf,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[6]  S. Dahrouge,et al.  Lifetime costs of colon and rectal cancer management in Canada. , 2003, Chronic diseases in Canada.

[7]  A. Jemal,et al.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  Hermann Brenner,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  A S Detsky,et al.  How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[10]  A. Fendrick,et al.  Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact? , 2004, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[11]  Michael Drummond,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. XIII. How to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1997, JAMA.

[12]  E. Paulson,et al.  Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison , 2005, The Lancet.

[13]  Michael Drummond,et al.  How to use an Article on Economic Analysis of Clinical Practice , 2005 .

[14]  M. Koopmanschap,et al.  Correcting for compensating mechanisms related to productivity costs in economic evaluations of health care programmes. , 2005, Health economics.

[15]  L. Fritschi,et al.  Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study. , 2004, Radiology.

[16]  M F Drummond,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. XIII. How to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1997, JAMA.

[17]  A. Zauber,et al.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. , 1993 .

[18]  S. Moss,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer , 1989, The Lancet.

[19]  M. Gold.  Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine , 2016 .

[20]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.

[21]  C. Howden,et al.  Differing attitudes toward virtual and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: surveys among primary care physicians and potential patients , 2001, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[22]  C. Johnson,et al.  Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[23]  Mark A Espeland,et al.  Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[24]  J. Olsen,et al.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test , 1996, The Lancet.

[25]  Cam Donaldson,et al.  An economic evaluation of activated protein C treatment for severe sepsis. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  L M Schuman,et al.  Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  L. Hirsch.  Competing interests: none declared. , 2006 .

[28]  S. Stryker,et al.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. , 1987, Gastroenterology.

[29]  V. Durkalski,et al.  Validation of virtual colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal polyps and masses , 2001, International journal of gastrointestinal cancer.

[30]  R. Hunt,et al.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Digestive Health Foundation: Guidelines on colon cancer screening. , 2004, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[31]  B. Suc,et al.  Multicentre study of surgical complications of colonoscopy , 1996, The British journal of surgery.

[32]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  J. Burdick,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. , 2004, JAMA.

[34]  J. Reed,et al.  Hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy , 1993, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[35]  D. Rex,et al.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[36]  E T Stewart,et al.  Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. , 2002, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[38]  D. McGee,et al.  Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[39]  R. Fedorak,et al.  Endoscopic perforation rates at a Canadian university teaching hospital. , 2004, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[40]  M. Vatn,et al.  Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. , 1996, Gut.

[41]  Peter Bauerfeind,et al.  Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? , 1999, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[42]  L. Rabeneck,et al.  A Population-Based Estimate of the Extent of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Ontario , 2004, American Journal of Gastroenterology.