Cross-Linked Hydrogels for Middle Ear Packing

Objective: To develop an ideal supportive packing material for ossiculoplasty, tympanoplasty, or other otologic procedures. Materials and Methods: Several materials, namely, Carbylan-SX (P-C; Sentrx Surgical, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT), Gelfoam (P-GF; Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI), and Merogel (P-MG; Medtronics, Inc., Minneapolis, MN), were prepared and then placed into a Hartley guinea pig's (Elm Hill, Chelmsford, MA) middle ear cavities through a large myringotomy incision. The contralateral ear underwent a large myringotomy without packing material being placed. Preoperative and posteroperative auditory brainstem response studies were performed using Intelligent Hearing system software. The animals were examined weekly. Two weeks after packing placement, the animals were killed, and the temporal bones were harvested. Whole temporal bone sectioning was performed to analyze the presence of implant, surrounding inflammation, presence of osteoneogenesis and fibrosis, or adhesions. Results: All the materials, except the P-MG, were easy to place into the middle ear cavity. The P-MG contains woven strands that are difficult to trim into the small sizes needed for placement. The P-MG group had a smaller average amount of implant present compared with the other groups at 2 weeks. The degree of osteoneogenesis was similar among the P-GF, P-C, and P-MG groups. The P-MG and P-C groups contained the lowest amount of fibrosis between the implant and surrounding middle ear structures. Conclusion: This study demonstrates promising results with P-C as a potential supportive packing material for otologic procedures. P-C compares favorably with P-MG and P-GF in a guinea pig model with respect to ease of placement and amount of fibrosis.

[1]  L. Stenfors,et al.  Absorbable gelatin sponge (Gelfoam) in otosurgery: one cause of undesirable postoperative results? , 1983, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  Glenn D Prestwich,et al.  Injectable synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering and repair. , 2006, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[3]  R. Orlandi,et al.  Chondroitin Sulfate Hydrogel and Wound Healing in Rabbit Maxillary Sinus Mucosa , 2004, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  H. Schuknecht Sensorineural hearing loss following stapedectomy. , 1962, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  F. Holzer The fate of gelatin film in the middle ear. , 1973, Archives of otolaryngology.

[6]  R. Çaylan,et al.  The effect on the middle-ear cavity of an absorbable gelatine sponge alone and with corticosteroids , 2002, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[7]  Glenn D Prestwich,et al.  Disulfide cross-linked hyaluronan hydrogels. , 2002, Biomacromolecules.

[8]  Glenn D Prestwich,et al.  In situ crosslinkable hyaluronan hydrogels for tissue engineering. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[9]  L. Feenstra,et al.  Studies on tympanic membrane transplants. I. Tympanic homografts. , 1975, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[10]  R. McCarthy,et al.  Surgery of the ear. , 1994, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[11]  R. Joseph The effect of absorbable gelatin sponge preparations and other agents on scar formation in the dog's middle ear. An experimental histopathologic study , 1962, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  G. Prestwich,et al.  Cross-linked hyaluronic acid hydrogel films: new biomaterials for drug delivery. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[13]  J. Dornhoffer,et al.  The effect of gelfilm in the prevention of fibrosis in the middle ear of the animal model. , 1999, The American journal of otology.

[14]  Glenn D Prestwich,et al.  Vocal fold tissue repair in vivo using a synthetic extracellular matrix. , 2006, Tissue engineering.