The influence of review pathology on study outcome of a randomized multicentre superficial bladder cancer trial. Members of the Dutch South East Cooperative Urological Group.
暂无分享,去创建一个
L. Kiemeney | J. Witjes | H. Schaafsma | J A Witjes | L A Kiemeney | H E Schaafsma | F M Debruyn | F. M. Debruyn
[1] C. Lynch,et al. Cancer registry problems in classifying invasive bladder cancer. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[2] J. Witjes,et al. A randomised prospective study comparing intravesical instillations of mitomycin-C, BCG-Tice, and BCG-RIVM in pTa-pT1 tumours and primary carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder. Dutch South-East Cooperative Urological Group. , 1993, European journal of cancer.
[3] R A Risdon,et al. Interpretation of biopsies of "normal" urothelium in patients with superficial bladder cancer. MRC Superficial Bladder Cancer Sub Group. , 1991, British journal of urology.
[4] J. Eble,et al. Benign and low-grade papillary lesions of the urinary bladder: a review of the papilloma-papillary carcinoma controversy, and a report of five typical papillomas. , 1989, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.
[5] P D Abel,et al. Differing interpretations by pathologists of the pT category and grade of transitional cell cancer of the bladder. , 1988, British journal of urology.
[6] L. Kiemeney,et al. Prognostic factors in superficial bladder cancer. A review. , 1992, European urology.
[7] M. Soloway,et al. Surveillance of stage O, grade I bladder cancer by cytology alone--is it acceptable? , 1984, The Journal of urology.
[8] L S Freedman,et al. Prognostic factors for recurrence and followup policies in the treatment of superficial bladder cancer: report from the British Medical Research Council Subgroup on Superficial Bladder Cancer (Urological Cancer Working Party). , 1989, The Journal of urology.
[9] M. Boon,et al. Analysis of the performance of pathologists in the grading of bladder tumors. , 1983, Human pathology.