Compression Regulates Mitotic Spindle Length by a Mechanochemical Switch at the Poles

BACKGROUND Although the molecules involved in mitosis are becoming better characterized, we still lack an understanding of the emergent mechanical properties of the mitotic spindle. For example, we cannot explain how spindle length is determined. To gain insight into how forces are generated and responded to in the spindle, we developed a method to apply controlled mechanical compression to metaphase mitotic spindles in living mammalian cells while monitoring microtubules and kinetochores by fluorescence microscopy. RESULTS Compression caused reversible spindle widening and lengthening to a new steady state. Widening was a passive mechanical response, and lengthening was an active mechanochemical process requiring microtubule polymerization but not kinesin-5 activity. Spindle morphology during lengthening and drug perturbations suggested that kinetochore fibers are pushed outward by pole-directed forces generated within the spindle. Lengthening of kinetochore fibers occurred by inhibition of microtubule depolymerization at poles, with no change in sliding velocity, interkinetochore stretching, or kinetochore dynamics. CONCLUSIONS We propose that spindle length is controlled by a mechanochemical switch at the poles that regulates the depolymerization rate of kinetochore fibers in response to compression and discuss models for how this switch is controlled. Poleward force appears to be exerted along kinetochore fibers by some mechanism other than kinesin-5 activity, and we speculate that it may arise from polymerization pressure from growing plus ends of interpolar microtubules whose minus ends are anchored in the fiber. These insights provide a framework for conceptualizing mechanical integration within the spindle.

[1]  Karsten Weis,et al.  Analysis of a RanGTP-regulated gradient in mitotic somatic cells , 2006, Nature.

[2]  J. Scholey,et al.  Kinesin-5-dependent poleward flux and spindle length control in Drosophila embryo mitosis. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.

[3]  E. Salmon,et al.  Traction force on a kinetochore at metaphase acts as a linear function of kinetochore fiber length , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  T. Mitchison,et al.  The kinetochore microtubule minus-end disassembly associated with poleward flux produces a force that can do work. , 1996, Molecular biology of the cell.

[5]  E. Salmon,et al.  Micromanipulation of chromosomes in mitotic vertebrate tissue cells: tension controls the state of kinetochore movement. , 1997, Experimental cell research.

[6]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Tankyrase-1 polymerization of poly(ADP-ribose) is required for spindle structure and function , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[7]  J. Yates,et al.  Plk1 and Aurora A regulate the depolymerase activity and the cellular localization of Kif2a , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[8]  J. Snyder Effect of metabolic inhibitors on sucrose-induced metaphase spindle elongation and spindle recovery. , 1988, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[9]  D. Begg,et al.  Micromanipulation studies of chromosome movement. I. Chromosome-spindle attachment and the mechanical properties of chromosomal spindle fibers , 1979, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  B. Yurke,et al.  Measurement of the force-velocity relation for growing microtubules. , 1997, Science.

[11]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  D. Mastronarde,et al.  Kinetochore microtubules in PTK cells , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  T. Hays,et al.  Spindle microtubules and their mechanical associations after micromanipulation in anaphase , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  R. Nicklas,et al.  Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint , 1995, Nature.

[15]  Y. Fukui,et al.  Agar-overlay immunofluorescence: high-resolution studies of cytoskeletal components and their changes during chemotaxis. , 1987, Methods in cell biology.

[16]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Spindle Fusion Requires Dynein-Mediated Sliding of Oppositely Oriented Microtubules , 2009, Current Biology.

[17]  T. Kapoor,et al.  Roles of polymerization dynamics, opposed motors, and a tensile element in governing the length of Xenopus extract meiotic spindles. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[18]  Shinya Inoué,et al.  Cell Motility by Labile Association of Molecules , 1967, The Journal of general physiology.

[19]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Differentiation of cytoplasmic and meiotic spindle assembly MCAK functions by Aurora B-dependent phosphorylation. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[20]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Direct, high-resolution measurement of furrow stiffening during division of adherent cells , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[21]  S. Inoué THE EFFECT OF COLCHICINE ON THE MICROSCOPIC AND SUBMICROSCOPIC STRUCTURE OF THE MITOTIC SPINDLE , 2008 .

[22]  G. C. Rogers,et al.  Microtubule motors in mitosis , 2000, Nature.

[23]  Alexey Khodjakov,et al.  Minus-end capture of preformed kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle morphogenesis , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  T. Schroer,et al.  Opposing motor activities are required for the organization of the mammalian mitotic spindle pole , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  David L. Brautigan,et al.  Midzone activation of aurora B in anaphase produces an intracellular phosphorylation gradient , 2008, Nature.

[26]  Susan L. Kline,et al.  Deciphering protein function during mitosis in PtK cells using RNAi , 2006, BMC Cell Biology.

[27]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  Kinetochore Microtubule Dynamics and Attachment Stability Are Regulated by Hec1 , 2006, Cell.

[28]  Alexey Khodjakov,et al.  Kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle assembly during animal mitosis , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  S Inoué,et al.  1. EARLY HISTORY: THE DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL , 1995 .

[30]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Beyond self-assembly: From microtubules to morphogenesis , 1986, Cell.

[31]  Anthony A. Hyman,et al.  Polarity controls forces governing asymmetric spindle positioning in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo , 2001, Nature.

[32]  Ye Ding,et al.  Relevance of kinetochore size and microtubule-binding capacity for stable chromosome attachment during mitosis in PtK1 cells , 1998, Chromosome Research.

[33]  Kendra S. Burbank,et al.  Slide-and-Cluster Models for Spindle Assembly , 2007, Current Biology.

[34]  D. Compton,et al.  Efficient Mitosis in Human Cells Lacking Poleward Microtubule Flux , 2005, Current Biology.

[35]  N. Caille,et al.  Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  R. Nicklas Measurements of the force produced by the mitotic spindle in anaphase , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  I. Shimoyama,et al.  Probing the mechanical architecture of the vertebrate meiotic spindle , 2009, Nature Methods.

[38]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Cell type variation in responses to antimitotic drugs that target microtubules and kinesin-5. , 2008, Cancer research.

[39]  J. Pickett-Heaps,et al.  Traction fibre: toward a "tensegral" model of the spindle. , 1997, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[40]  Eric Karsenti,et al.  Spatial Coordination of Spindle Assembly by Chromosome-Mediated Signaling Gradients , 2005, Science.

[41]  R. Wollman,et al.  Length Control of the Metaphase Spindle , 2005, Current Biology.

[42]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Kinesin 5–independent poleward flux of kinetochore microtubules in PtK1 cells , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  Howard J. Worman,et al.  Nuclear Membrane Dynamics and Reassembly in Living Cells: Targeting of an Inner Nuclear Membrane Protein in Interphase and Mitosis , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  D. Compton,et al.  Chromosome Movement in Mitosis Requires Microtubule Anchorage at Spindle Poles , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.