Systematic Design of Ancient Machines’ Models: Leonardo da Vinci’s Glider

Virtual or physical models of ancient machines are often used for museum exhibitions, documentaries and/or cinematographic works. Especially for high-fidelity models, complex activities are required, which actually lead the different stakeholders involved in the process to “design” an artifact (the model). As with any design process, the design of models of ancient machines can also benefit from the support of structured methods that guide the designers from the early “ideas” to the final design. This paper proposes a systematic approach specifically tailored for the interpretation and design of ancient machines, where a methodological tool is provided to manage both idea-generation and information-gathering activities. The method was applied to the design of a model of the delta wing conceived by Leonardo da Vinci (i.e., the glider represented in the Codex Madrid 1, Folio 64r), allowing to analyze and obtain an embodiment of the machine with the required fidelity level, thought to be realized in real scale.

[1]  A. Sampaio,et al.  Study of an “Artefact” of the Castilla Canal: Reconstruction of the Missing Machinery , 2022, Machines.

[2]  F. Rotini,et al.  Refined metric for a-posteriori novelty assessments , 2021, Journal of Engineering Design.

[3]  Lorenzo Fiorineschi,et al.  Novelty metrics in engineering design , 2021, Journal of Engineering Design.

[4]  D. Dörner,et al.  From da Vinci’s Flying Machines to a Theory of the Creative Process , 2021, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[5]  Lorenzo Fiorineschi,et al.  Application of Systematic Design Methods to Cultural Heritage Preservation , 2020, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[6]  Lorenzo Fiorineschi,et al.  Challenging COVID-19 with Creativity: Supporting Design Space Exploration for Emergency Ventilators , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[7]  M. Mossa.  The recent 500th anniversary of Leonardo da Vinci’s death: a reminder of his contribution in the field of fluid mechanics , 2020, Environmental Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  Santosh Jagtap,et al.  Design creativity: refined method for novelty assessment , 2019 .

[9]  Lorenzo Fiorineschi,et al.  Abstraction framework to support students in learning creative conceptual design , 2018, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology.

[10]  Carlos Cardoso,et al.  Where next for research on fixation, inspiration and creativity in design? , 2017 .

[11]  Lorenzo Fiorineschi,et al.  A new conceptual design approach for overcoming the flaws of functional decomposition and morphology , 2016 .

[12]  Pieter E. Vermaas,et al.  My functional description is better! , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[13]  Ehud Kroll,et al.  Design theory and conceptual design: contrasting functional decomposition and morphology with parameter analysis , 2013 .

[14]  Benoit Weil,et al.  Design theories as languages of the unknown: insights from the German roots of systematic design (1840–1960) , 2013 .

[15]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Assessing design creativity , 2011 .

[16]  Y. Reich.  My method is better! , 2010 .

[17]  Domenico Laurenza.  Leonardo on Flight , 2007 .

[18]  Ch Kees Dorst,et al.  On the conceptual framework of John Gero's FBS-model and the prescriptive aims of design methodology , 2007 .

[19]  Offer Shai,et al.  Infused design. I. Theory , 2004 .

[20]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[21]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[22]  J. Gero.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[23]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[24]  Paolo Galluzzi,et al.  Leonardo da Vinci: From the “elementi macchinali” to the man‐machine , 1987 .

[25]  R. Giacomelli,et al.  The Aerodynamics of Leonardo Da Vinci , 1930, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[26]  P. Innocenzi.  The Innovators Behind Leonardo , 2019 .

[27]  Erik Kaestner,et al.  The Mechanical Design Process , 2016 .

[28]  Denis Cavallucci,et al.  From TRIZ to OTSM-TRIZ: addressing complexity challenges in inventive design , 2007 .

[29]  W. Tarelko,et al.  LEONARDO DA VINCI – PRECURSOR OF ENGINEERING DESIGN , 2006 .

[30]  Belinda López-Mesa,et al.  NOVELTY METRICS IN ENGINEERING DESIGN EXPERIMENTS , 2006 .

[31]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .