Reproduction and transformation of students' technology practice: The tale of two distinctive secondary student cases

Disparities in the technology practices, skills and knowledge of school students still exist, despite widespread investment, and use in schools. In order to understand why inequalities remain, we first need a more nuanced understanding of students' technology practice, including understanding how their backgrounds, circumstances and experiences shape their perceptions of and engagement with technology. This paper proposes that research in the field of educational technology would benefit from a sociological framing in order to highlight how and why students use technology at school and in their everyday lives. The paper reports on a qualitative embedded case study of 13–16‐year‐old students in two Australian secondary schools. In‐depth case studies of two selected students illustrate the complex nature of students' technology practice. Bourdieu's concepts of field, habitus and capital are used as a lens through which to view and understand inequalities in students' technology practice. The findings demonstrate the utility of sociological theory in educational technology research by highlighting systems and structures of reproduction and transformation. Furthermore, the findings can inform an approach to teaching and learning that considers students' varied experiences, knowledge, perspectives and backgrounds relating to technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  L. Czerniewicz,et al.  Objectified Cultural Capital and the Tale of Two Students , 2012 .

[2]  K. Allen,et al.  Parents' perspectives on technology and children's learning in the home: social class and the role of the habitus , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[3]  Carmen Mills Reproduction and transformation of inequalities in schooling: the transformative potential of the theoretical constructs of Bourdieu , 2008 .

[4]  J. E. Davis,et al.  Schools as Sites for Transformation: Exploring the Contribution of Habitus: , 2011 .

[5]  Cushla Kapitzke,et al.  Information Technology as Cultural Capital:Shifting the Boundaries of Power , 2000, Education and Information Technologies.

[6]  Ove Edvard Hatlevik,et al.  Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Laura Robinson A TASTE FOR THE NECESSARY , 2009 .

[8]  N. Selwyn Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: the role of sociological theory , 2012 .

[9]  Scott Bulfin,et al.  Negotiating Digital Literacy Practices Across School and Home: Case Studies of Young People in Australia , 2007 .

[10]  Wendy Sutherland-Smith,et al.  The Digital Divide: Differences in Computer Use between Home and School in Low Socio-economic Households , 2003 .

[11]  Laura Czerniewicz,et al.  The habitus of digital "strangers" in higher education , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Learning technology: Theorising the tools we study , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[13]  Ioanna Vekiri,et al.  Socioeconomic differences in elementary students' ICT beliefs and out-of-school experiences , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Ilana Ariela Snyder,et al.  DIGITAL TASTES: Social class and young people's technology use , 2008 .

[15]  S. Cranmer Children and young people’s uses of the Internet for homework , 2006 .

[16]  Wilfried Admiraal,et al.  Inclusiveness of ICT in secondary education: students’ appreciation of ICT tools , 2012 .

[17]  Martin Cooper,et al.  From ICT coordination to ICT integration: a longitudinal case study , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[18]  Sue Bennett,et al.  Conceptualising technology practice in education using Bourdieu's sociology , 2018 .

[19]  Alison Taylor Finding the future that fits , 2005 .

[20]  Sue Bennett,et al.  Understanding students' use and value of technology for learning , 2014 .