0.2-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of internal lesions of the knee joint: a prospective arthroscopically controlled clinical study

Abstract The results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were compared with those of arthroscopy in a prospective series of 244 patients. A dedicated system for MRI of limbs and peripheral joints – the 0,2-T Artoscan (Esaote, Italy) – was used for imaging knee joint lesions. T1-weighted spin-echo sagittal images, T2-weighted gradient-echo coronal images, and axial views for lesions of the femoropatellar joint were acquired. Paraxial sagittal and oblique coronal views were obtained for imaging of the cruciate ligaments. This protocol allowed excellent visualization of the cruciate ligaments and medial and lateral meniscus in almost all patients. Compared with arthroscopy performed within 48 h after imaging, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were respectively 93%, 97%, and 95% for tears of the medial meniscus; 82%, 96%, and 93% for tears of the lateral meniscus; 100%, 100%, and 100% for tears of the posterior cruciate ligament; 98%, 98%, and 97% for tears of the anterior cruciate ligament; and 72%, 100%, and 92% for full-thickness articular cartilage lesions. The examination can be performed within 30–45 min at lower cost than diagnostic arthroscopy. MRI with a 0.2-T magnet is a safe and valuable adjunct to the clinical examination of the knee and an aid to efficient preoperative planning.

[1]  D. Wilson,et al.  Can MRI of the knee affect arthroscopic practice? A prospective study of 58 patients. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  H. Barden,et al.  Accuracy of Imaging the Menisci on an In-Office, Dedicated, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Extremity System* , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  A. Watkinson,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of meniscal and cruciate injuries of the knee. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  D. Hungerford,et al.  Chondromalacia patellae: a system of classification. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  H. Thomsen,et al.  MRI preferable to diagnostic arthroscopy in knee joint injuries. A double-blind comparison of 47 patients. , 1997, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[6]  S. Boden,et al.  MR scanning of the acutely injured knee: sensitive, but is it cost effective? , 1990, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[7]  W E Garrett,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of traumatic knee articular cartilage injuries , 1991, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  D. Dandy Arthroscopy and MRI for the knee , 1997 .

[9]  J. Crues,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee , 1988, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  K. Spindler,et al.  Prospective study of osseous, articular, and meniscal lesions in recent anterior cruciate ligament tears by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy , 1993, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  L. Bassett,et al.  Meniscal injuries: detection using MR imaging. , 1986, Radiology.

[12]  I. M. Levy,et al.  Sagittal MR images of the knee: a low-signal band parallel to the posterior cruciate ligament caused by a displaced bucket-handle tear. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  M. Friedman,et al.  Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  R. Staron,et al.  MR imaging of displaced bucket-handle tear of the medial meniscus. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  J. Callaghan,et al.  The accuracy of selective magnetic resonance imaging compared with the findings of arthroscopy of the knee. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  D. M. Silver,et al.  Tears of the meniscus as revealed by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.