Development of a Biconcave Mobile‐Bearing Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty Concept Using Finite Element Analysis and Design Optimization

Total disc arthroplasty (TDA) is a motion‐preserving surgical treatment for spinal disorders. However, adverse surgical outcomes, such as abnormal kinematics, facet joint (FJ) overloading, and polyethylene (PE) failures, have limited wide application of lumbar TDAs. The objectives of this computational study were to elucidate how implant design and FJ articulation both influence metal‐on‐polyethylene (MoP) motion and contact mechanics, as well as to propose and refine a new mobile‐bearing TDA concept which enhanced postoperative performance. Simulation results show that abnormal motions (lift‐off and/or unsymmetrical motion) are alleviated in fixed‐/mobile‐bearing TDA‐treated segments, as the FJ gap increases. It clearly demonstrates that FJ articulation guides segmental motion and interferes with intended MoP articulation. For an existing biconvex mobile‐bearing design, component impingement leads to a peak PE stress of 20.8 MPa (yield stress: 13 MPa), indicating a high risk of PE creep/fracture. Therefore, we proposed a new TDA concept featuring a biconcave PE core with a smooth shape, in order to strengthen the PE rim and mitigate edge‐loading. Furthermore, the biconcave‐core TDA was optimally designed to promote normal segmental range of motion (ROM), or to minimize polyethylene contact pressure (PCP). In extension (the severest loading scenario), the biconvex‐core TDA design caused a ROM 3.6° (+88%) greater than the intact segment and a peak PCP of 116.5 MPa. In contrast, ROM‐optimal or PCP‐optimal biconcave‐core TDA designs decreased the ROM difference to 0.0° or the peak PCP to 24.3 MPa. Therefore, this new TDA design can potentially reduce the incidence of hypermotion and PE damage. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1805–1816, 2019

[1]  Gun Choi,et al.  CHARITÉ Versus ProDisc: A Comparative Study of a Minimum 3-Year Follow-up , 2007, Spine.

[2]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Prediction of multiaxial mechanical behavior for conventional and highly crosslinked UHMWPE using a hybrid constitutive model. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[4]  L. Claes,et al.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[5]  Guoan Li,et al.  Sagittal plane rotation center of lower lumbar spine during a dynamic weight-lifting activity. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Thomas Zweig,et al.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[7]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Total Disc Replacement Positioning Affects Facet Contact Forces and Vertebral Body Strains , 2008, Spine.

[8]  S. Kurtz,et al.  The Latest Lessons Learned from Retrieval Analyses of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, and Alternative Bearing Total Disc Replacements. , 2012, Seminars in spine surgery.

[9]  L. Pimenta,et al.  The importance of the anterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar disc arthroplasty: 36-Month follow-up experience in extreme lateral total disc replacement , 2012, International Journal of Spine Surgery.

[10]  L. Felli,et al.  Lumbar total disc arthroplasty: outdated surgery or here to stay procedure? A systematic review of current literature , 2017, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[11]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on spine kinematics and facet joint loads in flexion and extension: a finite element analysis , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[12]  Marc-Antoine Rousseau,et al.  Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces. , 2006, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  H. Wilke,et al.  Do in vivo kinematic studies provide insight into adjacent segment degeneration? A qualitative systematic literature review , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[14]  Shih-Hao Chen,et al.  Biomechanical comparison between lumbar disc arthroplasty and fusion. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  What Is the Correlation of In Vivo Wear and Damage Patterns With In Vitro TDR Motion Response? , 2008, Spine.

[16]  A. Messac,et al.  The normalized normal constraint method for generating the Pareto frontier , 2003 .

[17]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Impingement Sensitivity to Disc Height Distraction, Spinal Sagittal Orientation, Implant Position, and Implant Lordosis , 2012, Spine.

[19]  J. Fisher,et al.  Wear characteristics of an unconstrained lumbar total disc replacement under a range of in vitro test conditions , 2015, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[20]  L. Claes,et al.  The relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and facet joint forces - A finite element analysis. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  R. Mobbs,et al.  Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Reconstruction to Reduce Hypermobility of Cervical and Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty , 2017, Asian spine journal.

[22]  Ryan Willing,et al.  Quantifying the competing relationship between durability and kinematics of total knee replacements using multiobjective design optimization and validated computational models. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Manohar M Panjabi,et al.  Effects of Charité Artificial Disc on the Implanted and Adjacent Spinal Segments Mechanics Using a Hybrid Testing Protocol , 2005, Spine.

[24]  F. Galbusera,et al.  Biomechanical studies on cervical total disc arthroplasty: a literature review. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[25]  Ryan Willing,et al.  Design optimization of a total knee replacement for improved constraint and flexion kinematics. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  I. Y. Kim,et al.  Adaptive weighted-sum method for bi-objective optimization: Pareto front generation , 2005 .

[27]  D. Ku,et al.  Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  A non-optimized follower load path may cause considerable intervertebral rotations. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  S. Salzmann,et al.  Lumbar disc replacement surgery—successes and obstacles to widespread adoption , 2017, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

[30]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Applying a follower load delivers realistic results for simulating standing. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  The Implications of Constraint in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[32]  Hendrik Schmidt,et al.  The effect of different design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the range of motion, facet joint forces and instantaneous center of rotation of a L4-5 segment , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[33]  Jung-Hee Lee,et al.  Biomechanical changes of the lumbar segment after total disc replacement : charite(r), prodisc(r) and maverick(r) using finite element model study. , 2010, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[34]  Ryan Willing,et al.  Three dimensional shape optimization of total knee replacements for reduced wear , 2009 .

[35]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Human Lumbar Vertebrae: Quantitative Three-Dimensional Anatomy , 1992, Spine.

[36]  H. Wilke,et al.  Limitations of current in vitro test protocols for investigation of instrumented adjacent segment biomechanics: critical analysis of the literature , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[37]  Bryan W Cunningham,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Total Disc Replacement Arthroplasty: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model , 2003, Spine.

[38]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Comparison of eight published static finite element models of the intact lumbar spine: predictive power of models improves when combined together. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  Paul Park,et al.  Adjacent Segment Disease after Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion: Review of the Literature , 2004, Spine.

[40]  A. Studer Nucleus prosthesis: a new concept , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[41]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Normal-Boundary Intersection: A New Method for Generating the Pareto Surface in Nonlinear Multicriteria Optimization Problems , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[42]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Biomechanics of the Lumbar Spine in Sagittal/Lateral Moments , 1994, Spine.

[43]  Helmut D. Link,et al.  History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charité artificial disc , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[44]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[45]  G. J. Verkerke,et al.  Geometry of the Intervertebral Volume and Vertebral Endplates of the Human Spine , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[46]  Avinash G Patwardhan,et al.  Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[47]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. , 1999, Spine.

[48]  Olivier Ethgen,et al.  Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[49]  Robert Gunzburg,et al.  Spine arthroplasty: a historical review , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[50]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Articular Facets of the Human Spine Quantitative Three‐Dimensional Anatomy , 1993, Spine.

[51]  A. R.,et al.  Review of literature , 1951, American Potato Journal.