Robust Clustering in Generalized Bounded Confidence Models

Bounded confidence models add a critical theoretical ingredient to the explanation of opinion clustering, opinion polarisation, and the persistence of opinion diversity, assuming that individuals are only influenced by others who are sufficiently similar and neglect actors with too different views. However, despite its enormous recognition in the literature, the bounded confidence assumption has been criticized for being able to explain diversity only when implemented in a very strict and unrealistic way. The model is unable to explain patterns of opinion diversity when actors are sometimes influenced also by others who hold distant views, even when these deviations from the bounded-confidence assumption are rare and random. Here, we echo this criticism but we also show that the model's ability to explain opinion diversity can be regained when another assumption is relaxed. Building on modeling work from statistical mechanics, we include that actors' opinion changes do not only result from social influence. When other influences are modelled as random, uniformly distributed draws, then robust patterns of opinion clustering emerge also with the relaxed implementations of bounded confidence. The results holds under both communication regimes: the updating to the average of all acceptable opinions as in the model of Hegselmann and Krause (2002) and random pair-wise communication as in the model of Deffuant et al. (2000). We discuss implications for future modelling work and point to gaps in empirical research on influence.

[1]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[2]  Noah Mark,et al.  Culture and Competition: Homophily and distancing Explanations for Cultural Niches , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[3]  M. Macy.  Polarization in Dynamic Networks : A Hopfield Model of Emergent Structure , 2003 .

[4]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  In the Short Term We Divide, in the Long Term We Unite: Demographic Crisscrossing and the Effects of Faultlines on Subgroup Polarization , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  Tipping diffusivity in information accumulation systems: more links, less consensus , 2009, 0909.1252.

[6]  Heinrich H. Nax,et al.  A Behavioral Study of 'Noise' in Coordination Games , 2015, J. Econ. Theory.

[7]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[8]  Emilio Hernández-García,et al.  The noisy Hegselmann-Krause model for opinion dynamics , 2013, 1309.2858.

[9]  A. Lubin,et al.  Distance as a determinant of influence in a two-person serial interaction situation. , 1958, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[10]  Andreas Flache,et al.  How to get the timing right. A computational model of the effects of the timing of contacts on team cohesion in demographically diverse teams , 2008, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[11]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  The Signal Importance of Noise , 2015 .

[12]  E. Ben-Naim,et al.  Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes , 2002, cond-mat/0212313.

[13]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[14]  T. Liggett,et al.  Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes , 1999 .

[15]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. , 1963 .

[16]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[17]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Group decision making and quantitative judgments: A consensus model. , 1996 .

[18]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[19]  David Lee,et al.  Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  C. Wagner,et al.  Rational Consensus in Science and Society , 1981 .

[21]  M. Degroot.  Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[22]  Raul Toral,et al.  Noisy continuous-opinion dynamics , 2009, 0906.0441.

[23]  R. Axelrod.  The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[24]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  The Problem of Social Control and Coordination of Complex Systems in Sociology: A Look at the Community Cleavage Problem , 2015, IEEE Control Systems.

[25]  A. Flache,et al.  Differentiation without Distancing. Explaining Bi-Polarization of Opinions without Negative Influence , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Individualization as Driving Force of Clustering Phenomena in Humans , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Laurent Salzarulo,et al.  A Continuous Opinion Dynamics Model Based on the Principle of Meta-Contrast , 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[28]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[29]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[30]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  Continuous Opinion Dynamics under Bounded Confidence: A Survey , 2007, 0707.1762.

[31]  Adrian Carro,et al.  The Role of Noise and Initial Conditions in the Asymptotic Solution of a Bounded Confidence, Continuous-Opinion Model , 2012, Journal of Statistical Physics.