Location of Er atoms with respect to Si nanoclusters in luminescent Er and Si co-implanted silicates

In this contribution we explore the structural properties of different silicate glasses coimplanted with Si and Er ions to various doses, and see how they affect the emission properties around 1540 nm. We have used silica, soda-lime and aluminium silicates as substrates. A multi-implantation scheme provided an uniform Si excess (5 or 15%) background to the subsequently implanted Er atoms. Er peak concentration has been varied between 2×1019 cm−3 to 6×1020 cm−3. The structural analysis of the resulting structures have been performed by means of SIMS, XPS, Raman, and EFTEM. It was found that the best photoluminescence (PL) emission properties are the ones for which a phase separation between the implanted Si and the matrix occurs, even without the formation of nanocrystalline aggregates. Amorphous Si nanoclusters with average size around 3 nm (for high Si content) or below 1nm (for low Si content) have been revealed after the EFTEM analysis. By analysing the layers by EELS and HAADF we have been able to determine the location of Er atoms relative to the Si nanoclusters for the first time to our knowledge. In samples with Er concentration higher than 1020 cm−3, the Er atoms are not randomly dispersed in the matrix. On the contrary, they tend to aggregate, forming large agglomerations mostly in the regions of lower density of Si precipitates. This observation correlates with the appearance of PL quenching at concentrations around 2×1020 cm−3. A suitable tuning of the annealing temperature has been found to drastically reduce this deleterious effect.

[1]  J. Shin,et al.  Exciton–erbium coupling and the excitation dynamics of Er3+ in erbium-doped silicon-rich silicon oxide , 2001 .

[2]  Keiichi Yamamoto,et al.  1.54 μm photoluminescence of Er3+ doped into SiO2 films containing Si nanocrystals: Evidence for energy transfer from Si nanocrystals to Er3+ , 1997 .

[3]  P. Pellegrino,et al.  Elucidation of the surface passivation role on the photoluminescence emission yield of silicon nanocrystals embedded in SiO2 , 2002 .

[4]  Domenico Pacifici,et al.  Modeling and perspectives of the Si nanocrystals-Er interaction for optical amplification , 2003 .

[5]  F. Priolo,et al.  Sensitizing properties of amorphous Si clusters on the 1.54-μm luminescence of Er in Si-rich SiO2 , 2003 .

[6]  Paolo Mazzoldi,et al.  Structural modifications in ion-implanted silicate glasses , 1999 .

[7]  Xinwei Zhao,et al.  FABRICATION AND STIMULATED EMISSION OF ER-DOPED NANOCRYSTALLINE SI WAVEGUIDES FORMED ON SI SUBSTRATES BY LASER ABLATION , 1999 .

[8]  Namkyoo Park,et al.  Coefficient determination related to optical gain in erbium-doped silicon-rich silicon oxide waveguide amplifier , 2002 .

[9]  Domenico Pacifici,et al.  Er3+ ions–Si nanocrystals interactions and their effects on the luminescence properties , 2000 .

[10]  Robert Elliman,et al.  The effect of annealing environment on the luminescence of silicon nanocrystals in silica , 2004 .

[11]  Pieter G. Kik,et al.  Strong exciton-erbium coupling in Si nanocrystal-doped SiO2 , 2000 .

[12]  Exciton-erbium coupling in SiOx suboxide films prepared by combining sol–gel chemistry and ion implantation , 2003 .

[13]  Tom Gregorkiewicz,et al.  Sensitization of Er luminescence by Si nanoclusters , 2004 .

[14]  Se-Young Seo,et al.  Optical gain at 1.54 μm in erbium-doped silicon nanocluster sensitized waveguide , 2001 .

[15]  F. Priolo,et al.  Formation and evolution of luminescent Si nanoclusters produced by thermal annealing of SiOx films , 2004 .