Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases

Background and Aims: The first step in each systematic review is selection of the most valid database that can provide the highest number of relevant references. This study was carried out to determine the most suitable database for information retrieval in telemedicine field. Methods: Cinhal, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for telemedicine matched with Education, cost benefit and patient satisfaction. After analysis of the obtained results, the accuracy coefficient, sensitivity, uniqueness and overlap of databases were calculated. Results: The studied databases differed in the number of retrieved articles. PubMed was identified as the most suitable database for retrieving information on the selected topics with the accuracy and sensitivity ratios of 50.7% and 61.4% respectively. The uniqueness percent of retrieved articles ranged from 38% for Pubmed to 3.0% for Cinhal. The highest overlap rate (18.6%) was found between PubMed and Web of Science. Less than 1% of articles have been indexed in all searched databases. Conclusion: PubMed is suggested as the most suitable database for starting search in telemedicine and after PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science can retrieve about 90% of the relevant articles.

[1]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Systematic Reviews in Public Health , 2008 .

[2]  L. Say,et al.  Effectiveness of different databases in identifying studies for systematic reviews: experience from the WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[3]  R. Roine,et al.  Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. , 2001, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[4]  George Demiris,et al.  An analysis of the specialized literature in the field of telemedicine. , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[5]  Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy,et al.  MEDLINE versus EMBASE and CINAHL for telemedicine searches. , 2010, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[6]  Dean Giustini,et al.  The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews , 2013, Systematic Reviews.

[7]  C. Counsell,et al.  Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1995, BMJ.

[8]  Jodie Doyle,et al.  Systematic Reviews in Public Health , 2017 .

[9]  A. Long,et al.  Comparison of bibliographic databases for information on the rehabilitation of people with severe mental illness. , 2001, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[10]  D. Lawlor,et al.  Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns? , 2004, Complementary therapies in medicine.

[11]  Claire Stansfield,et al.  Searching for systematic reviews of the effects of social and environmental interventions: a case study of children and obesity. , 2010, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[12]  Kath Wright,et al.  Can we prioritise which databases to search? A case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management. , 2013, Health information and libraries journal.

[13]  Kanagasingam Yogesan,et al.  Gap analysis in telemedicine , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  R. Haynes,et al.  Comparison of top-performing search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies and systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[15]  M. Clarke,et al.  Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1995, BMJ.

[16]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1994 .

[17]  Johanna Löhönen,et al.  Coverage of the bibliographic databases in mental health research , 2010, Nordic journal of psychiatry.

[18]  D. W. Lawrence What is lost when searching only one literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion? , 2008, Injury Prevention.

[19]  L. Hartling,et al.  Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[20]  J H Sanders,et al.  Telemedicine: Where It Is and Where It's Going , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.