The effect of training on the perceived approach angle in visual vertical heading judgements in a virtual environment

Past studies have found poorer performance on vertical heading judgement accuracy compared to horizontal heading judgement accuracy. In everyday life, precise vertical heading judgements are used less often than horizontal heading judgements as we cannot usually control our vertical direction. However, pilots judging a landing approach need to consistently discriminate vertical heading angles to land safely. This study addresses the impact of training on participants’ ability to judge their touchdown point relative to a target in a virtual environment with a clearly defined ground plane and horizon. Thirty-one participants completed a touchdown point estimation task twice, using three angles of descent (3°, 6° and 9°). In between the two testing tasks, half of the participants completed a flight simulator landing training task which provided feedback on their vertical heading performance; while, the other half completed a two-dimensional puzzle game as a control. Overall, participants were more precise in their responses in the second testing compared to the first (from a SD of ± 0.91° to ± 0.67°), but only the experimental group showed improvement in accuracy (from a mean error of − 2.1° to − 0.6°). Our results suggest that with training, vertical heading judgments can be as accurate as horizontal heading judgments. This study is the first to show the effectiveness of training in vertical heading judgement in naïve individuals. The results are applicable in the field of aviation, informing possible strategies for pilot training.

[1]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Effects of visual stimulus characteristics and individual differences in heading estimation. , 2018, Journal of vision.

[2]  Stephen Palmisano,et al.  Effects of scenery, lighting, glideslope, and experience on timing the landing flare. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[3]  A. V. van den Berg Robustness of perception of heading from optic flow. , 1992, Vision research.

[4]  W. Warren,et al.  Perception of translational heading from optical flow. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Vincenzo Maffei,et al.  Simulated Self-motion in a Visual Gravity Field: Sensitivity to Vertical and Horizontal , 2022 .

[6]  J. Gibson,et al.  Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  B. Crane Human Visual and Vestibular Heading Perception in the Vertical Planes , 2014, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[8]  Benjamin T. Crane,et al.  Direction Specific Biases in Human Visual and Vestibular Heading Perception , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  Stephen Palmisano,et al.  Visual perception of touchdown point during simulated landing. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[10]  Paul R. MacNeilage,et al.  Systematic Biases in Human Heading Estimation , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Paul R MacNeilage,et al.  The effect of supine body position on human heading perception. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[12]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[13]  F. Hawkins Human factors in aviation. , 1979, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[14]  F. Mast,et al.  Self-motion perception training: thresholds improve in the light but not in the dark , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  U Rosenhall,et al.  Vestibular Macular Mapping in Man , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[16]  W. Warren,et al.  The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Yong Gu,et al.  Decoding of MSTd Population Activity Accounts for Variations in the Precision of Heading Perception , 2010, Neuron.

[18]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Vestibular Heading Discrimination and Sensitivity to Linear Acceleration in Head and World Coordinates , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[20]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Visual Misperception in Aviation: Glide Path Performance in a Black Hole Environment , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Robert S. Allison,et al.  Pilot gaze and glideslope control , 2010, TAP.

[22]  D. Newport,et al.  Transient natural convection in a conducting enclosure heated from above , 2013, J. Vis..

[23]  Simon K. Rushton,et al.  Optic Flow and Beyond , 2004 .