Context clues for the stall of the Citizens' Initiative: lessons for opening up e-participation development practice

The European Union recently launched an innovative participatory mechanism allowing its citizens across Europe get together and set the agenda for policy-making in Brussels. The tool - the European ...

[1]  R. Lindner,et al.  Electronic Petitions and Institutional Modernization International Parliamentary E-Petition Systems in Comparative Perspective , 2009 .

[2]  John A. Taylor,et al.  Reinventing government in the information age , 1994 .

[3]  Ian Goodwin,et al.  The Internet, Organisational Change and Community Engagement: The Case of Birmingham City Council 1 , 2005 .

[4]  Mirko Vintar,et al.  Technology as the Key Driver of Organizational Transformation in the eGovernment Period: Towards a New Formal Framework , 2011, EGOV.

[5]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective , 2011, dg.o '11.

[6]  Andrew Chadwick,et al.  Explaining the Failure of an Online Citizen Engagement Initiative: The Role of Internal Institutional Variables , 2011 .

[7]  Eunjung Shin,et al.  Attitudinal Determinants of E-Government Technology Use among U.S. Local Public Managers , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Collaborative e‐government , 2012 .

[9]  Zahid Parvez.  Local Democracy Shaping e-Democracy , 2003, EGOV.

[10]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, , . , 2011 .

[11]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  A Communication Genre Perspective on e-Petitioning: The Case of the Citizens' Initiative , 2012, ePart.

[12]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[13]  A Kolsaker.  Singing from the Same Hymnsheet? The Impact of Internal Stakeholders on the Development of e-Democracy , 2009 .

[14]  Nils Gustafsson,et al.  The subtle nature of Facebook politics: Swedish social network site users and political participation , 2012, New Media Soc..

[15]  Gamel O. Wiredu.  Information Systems Innovation in Public Organisations: An Institutional Perspective , 2012, Inf. Technol. People.

[16]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Evaluating e‐government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[17]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Democracy Squared: Designing On-Line Political Communities to Accommodate Conflicting Interests , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Establishing Political Deliberation Systems: Key Problems , 2008, ECIS.

[19]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Public governance as a socio-technical system: from concept to application , 2009, D.GO.

[20]  Elena Sánchez-Nielsen,et al.  eParticipation in Practice in Europe: The Case of "Puzzled by Policy: Helping You Be Part of EU" , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  Richard Heeks.  Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform , 2002 .

[22]  Lawrence Pratchett,et al.  Barriers to e-democracy: local government experiences and responses , 2005 .

[23]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  eParticipation research: Systematizing the field , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  A New Agenda for e-Democracy , 2005 .

[25]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[26]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  Understanding eParticipation State of Play in Europe , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[27]  K. Tarabanis,et al.  Electronic Participation Policies and Initiatives in the European Union Institutions , 2012 .

[28]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[29]  R. Krimmer,et al.  Towards the enhancement of e‐democracy: identifying the notion of the ‘middleman paradox’ , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[30]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Barriers for transformation: Impediments for transforming the public sector through e-government , 2009, ECIS.

[31]  S. Borins,et al.  A Holistic View of Public Sector Information Technology , 2005 .

[32]  Trish Reay,et al.  What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution in Family Business? , 2011 .

[33]  Alexandros Xenakis,et al.  An evaluation framework for e-participation in parliaments , 2010 .

[34]  Electoral Assistance,et al.  Direct Democracy: The International IDEA Handbook , 2008 .

[35]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Forward to the past: Lessons for the future of e-government from the story so far , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[36]  A. Chadwick.  Bringing E-Democracy Back In , 2003 .

[37]  Leela Damodaran,et al.  Citizen Participation and engagement in the Design of e-Government Services: The Missing Link in Effective ICT Design and Delivery , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[38]  F. Land,et al.  The Contribution of Sociotechnical Systems Thinking to the Effective Adoption of e-Government and the Enhancement of Democracy , 2005 .

[39]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Why do eGovernment Projects Fail? Risk Factors of Large Information Systems Projects in the Greek Public Sector: An International Comparison , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[40]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres in Electronic Communication: Reinforcement and Change of Social Interaction , 1999 .

[41]  Henrik Eriksson,et al.  Integrating the Rational Unified Process and participatory design for development of socio-technical systems: a user participative approach , 2007 .

[42]  Tero Päivärinta,et al.  Models of E-Democracy , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[44]  Tero Päivärinta,et al.  The Genre System Lens on E-Democracy , 2008, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[45]  A. Whyte,et al.  Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation , 2008 .