Creation of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds for structural bone repair using a combined finite element modeling and rapid prototyping approach.

There is a clinical need for synthetic bioactive materials that can reliably repair intercalary skeletal tissue loss in load-bearing bones. Bioactive glasses have been investigated as one such material but their mechanical response has been a concern. Previously, we created bioactive silicate glass (13-93) scaffolds with a uniform grid-like microstructure which showed a compressive strength comparable to human cortical bone but a much lower flexural strength. In the present study, finite element modeling (FEM) was used to re-design the scaffold microstructure to improve its flexural strength without significantly lowering its compressive strength and ability to support bone infiltration in vivo. Then scaffolds with the requisite microstructures were created by a robotic deposition method and tested in four-point bending and compression to validate the FEM simulations. In general, the data validated the predictions of the FEM simulations. Scaffolds with a porosity gradient, composed of a less porous outer region and a more porous inner region, showed a flexural strength (34±5MPa) that was more than twice the value for the uniform grid-like microstructure (15±5MPa) and a higher compressive strength (88±20MPa) than the grid-like microstructure (72±10MPa). Upon implantation of the scaffolds for 12weeks in rat calvarial defects in vivo, the amount of new bone that infiltrated the pore space of the scaffolds with the porosity gradient (37±16%) was similar to that for the grid-like scaffolds (35±6%). These scaffolds with a porosity gradient that better mimics the microstructure of human long bone could provide more reliable implants for structural bone repair.

[1]  S M Giannitelli,et al.  Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[2]  Ming-Chuan Leu,et al.  Porous and strong bioactive glass (13–93) scaffolds fabricated by freeze extrusion technique , 2011 .

[3]  G. Hilmas,et al.  Mechanical properties of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds fabricated by robotic deposition for structural bone repair. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[4]  M. Matthewson,et al.  Mechanical properties of ceramics , 1996 .

[5]  Eleftherios Tsiridis,et al.  Bone substitutes: an update. , 2005, Injury.

[6]  F. Boschet,et al.  Weibull Parameters and the Tensile Strength of Porous Phosphate Glass-Ceramics , 2004 .

[7]  Aldo R. Boccaccini,et al.  Bioactive Glass and Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2010, Materials.

[8]  L. Bonewald,et al.  Healing of critical-size segmental defects in rat femora using strong porous bioactive glass scaffolds. , 2014, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[9]  Eduardo Saiz,et al.  Bioinspired Strong and Highly Porous Glass Scaffolds , 2011, Advanced functional materials.

[10]  C. Pappalettere,et al.  Finite Element Method (FEM), Mechanobiology and Biomimetic Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering , 2011, International journal of biological sciences.

[11]  Eduardo Saiz,et al.  Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives. , 2011, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[12]  Marc Long,et al.  Bone Graft Substitutes , 2003 .

[13]  Fernando Guiberteau,et al.  Finite element modeling as a tool for predicting the fracture behavior of robocast scaffolds. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[14]  Eduardo Saiz,et al.  Direct ink writing of highly porous and strong glass scaffolds for load-bearing bone defects repair and regeneration. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[15]  Delbert E. Day,et al.  Freeze extrusion fabrication of 13–93 bioactive glass scaffolds for bone repair , 2011, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[16]  A. M. Deliormanlı,et al.  Direct-write assembly of silicate and borate bioactive glass scaffolds for bone repair , 2012 .

[17]  L. Bonewald,et al.  Enhanced bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects implanted with surface-modified and BMP-loaded bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[18]  D. Lacroix,et al.  A dynamical study of the mechanical stimuli and tissue differentiation within a CaP scaffold based on micro-CT finite element models , 2011, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[19]  Delbert E Day,et al.  Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[20]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  The story of Bioglass® , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[21]  Julian R Jones,et al.  Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[22]  M. Rahaman,et al.  Tough and strong porous bioactive glass-PLA composites for structural bone repair , 2017, Journal of Materials Science.

[23]  Paolo Giannoni,et al.  A tissue engineering approach to bone repair in large animal models and in clinical practice. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[24]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Computer-aided design and finite-element modelling of biomaterial scaffolds for bone tissue engineering , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.